Analyzing the Merger and De-merger of the Northern and Eastern Provinces
The Historical and Political Context of Tamil Self-Determination in Sri Lanka
Preamble
The Northern and Eastern provinces of Sri Lanka have long
been recognized as regions with a significant Tamil population. Historically,
these areas have been predominantly inhabited by Tamils, and their cultural,
linguistic, and historical identities have been shaped over centuries. This
essay argues that the question of merging or demerging these provinces should
be secondary to granting the Tamil people the right to self-determination and
land rights. By examining the historical context, the political decisions
surrounding the merger and demerger, and the implications of these actions, we
can gain a deeper understanding of the core issues at stake.
Historical Context
Before Sri Lanka gained independence in 1948, the Northern
and Eastern provinces were distinct regions under British colonial rule. The
island, then known as Ceylon, was divided into administrative districts rather
than provinces. The Northern Province was predominantly Tamil-speaking peoples,
with Jaffna as its cultural and administrative center. The Eastern Province was
predominantly Tamil and ethnically diverse, with Tamil, Sinhalese, and Muslim
communities 1.
During the colonial period, the British implemented policies
that influenced the socio-economic and demographic dynamics of these regions.
For example, the British introduced plantation agriculture, but this was
concentrated in the central highlands, leaving the Northern and Eastern regions
less developed in comparison 2.
Jaffna became a hub for education, with missionary schools playing a
significant role in literacy and higher education among the Tamil community3.
The British census and administrative practices highlighted the ethnic
composition of these regions, laying the groundwork for later political and
ethnic tensions.
Historical Roots of the Issue
The historical roots of the Tamil self-determination issue
in Sri Lanka can be traced back to several key factors:
- Ancient
History: The Tamil presence in Sri Lanka dates back over 2,500 years,
with historical records indicating the existence of indigenous Tamils,
Tamil kingdoms, and settlements in the Northern and Eastern regions 1.
- Colonial
Era: British colonial rule significantly impacted the socio-economic
and demographic dynamics of Sri Lanka. The British introduced plantation
agriculture, concentrated in the central highlands, and implemented
policies that highlighted ethnic divisions 2.
The colonial administration's census practices emphasized the distinct
identities of the Tamil and Sinhalese populations 3.
- Post-Independence
Policies: After gaining independence in 1948, successive
Sinhalese-majority governments implemented policies that marginalized the
Tamil population. These included language policies favouring Sinhala,
discriminatory education and employment practices, and land appropriation 2.
- Armed
Conflicts: The Tamil struggle for self-determination intensified with
the outbreak of the Armed Conflicts in 1983. The conflict between the Sri
Lankan government and the LTTE led to significant loss of life,
displacement, and destruction in the Northern and Eastern provinces 3.
- Political
Agreements and Amendments: The Indo-Lanka Accord of 1987 and the 13th
Amendment to the Constitution attempted to address ethnic tensions by
merging the Northern and Eastern provinces. However, the merger faced
opposition and was ultimately declared unconstitutional by the Supreme
Court in 2006 3.
The Merger and Demerger of Provinces
The concept of merged or demerged provincial administrations
in Sri Lanka emerged after 1948, following the country's independence from
British colonial rule. The Indo-Lanka Accord of 1987 and the subsequent 13th
Amendment to the Constitution introduced the idea of merging the Northern and
Eastern Provinces as part of efforts to devolve power and address ethnic
tensions. This merger was implemented under the administration led by the
Sinhala-majority government.
However, the merger was controversial and faced opposition
from various groups, including Sinhalese nationalists. Key political parties
involved in opposing the merger included the United National Party (UNP) and
the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP). Prominent figures such as Ranil
Wickremesinghe and Anura Kumara Dissanayake were vocal in their opposition3.
The Supreme Court ruling in 2006 declared the merger is unconstitutional and
led to the de-merger of the provinces. These administrative changes were driven
by political decisions and were not reflective of the historical unity between
the provinces before independence.
The Right to Self-Determination
The core questions surrounding Tamil Eelam are whether it is
a merger of North and East or a demerger of North and East. However, this
debate often overlooks the fundamental issue of the Tamil people's right to
self-determination. Historically, the Northern and Eastern provinces have been
predominantly indigenous Tamil-inherited land. Therefore, it should not be a
question of merger or demerger of the provinces but rather granting the right
to self-determination and land rights to the Tamils.
Main Arguments for Self-Determination for Tamils:
- Historical
Presence: Tamils have lived in the Northern and Eastern provinces for
over 2,500 years, establishing a deep-rooted connection to the land 1.
- Cultural
and Linguistic Identity: The Tamil language, culture, and heritage are
distinct and have flourished independently in these regions 2.
- Colonial
Legacy: British colonial policies highlighted the ethnic composition
and distinct identities of these regions, laying the groundwork for later
political and ethnic tensions 3.
- Discrimination
and Marginalization: Post-independence policies by the
Sinhalese-majority government have led to systematic discrimination
against Tamils, including in language, education, and employment.
- International
Law: The right to self-determination is recognized under international
law, including the UN Charter and major human rights covenants.
- Ethnic
Homeland: The Northern and Eastern provinces are historically
recognized as the Tamil homeland, and this should be respected in any
political solution.
International Law and Self-Determination
International law strongly supports the principle of
self-determination, which is enshrined in several key documents and treaties:
- United
Nations Charter: Article 1 of the UN Charter states that one of the
main purposes of the United Nations is to "develop friendly relations
among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and
self-determination of peoples". This foundational document
underscores the importance of self-determination in fostering global peace
and security.
- International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR): Article 1 of the ICCPR
affirms that all peoples have the right to self-determination and that by
virtue of that right, they freely determine their political status and
pursue their economic, social, and cultural development.
- International
Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR): Similar to
the ICCPR, Article 1 of the ICESCR recognizes the right of all peoples to
self-determination.
- Decolonization:
The principle of self-determination was a driving force behind the
decolonization movements of the 1960s and 1970s, leading to the
independence of many former colonies.
These international legal frameworks provide a robust
foundation for the Tamil people's claim to self-determination, emphasizing
their right to freely determine their political status and pursue their
development without external interference.
Key Political Leaders in the Merger Controversy
The merger and subsequent demerger of the Northern and
Eastern provinces involved several key political figures and parties:
- Ranil
Wickremesinghe: Leader of the United National Party (UNP) and a
prominent figure in Sri Lankan politics. He has served multiple terms as
Prime Minister and was a vocal opponent of the merger 3.
- Anura
Kumara Dissanayake: Leader of the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP), a
left-wing political party. Dissanayake and his party were also opposed to
the merger, advocating for the de-merger of the provinces 3.
- Mahinda
Rajapaksa: Former President of Sri Lanka and leader of the Sri Lanka
Podujana Peramuna (SLPP). Rajapaksa's administration played a significant
role in the political landscape during the period of the merger and demerger.
- Velupillai
Prabhakaran: Leader of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), a
militant organization that fought for Tamil independence. Prabhakaran's
actions and the LTTE's insurgency were central to the conflict in the
Northern and Eastern provinces.
- Chandrika
Kumaratunga: Former President of Sri Lanka who was in office during
the signing of the Indo-Lanka Accord and the implementation of the 13th
Amendment, which facilitated the merger.
Main Challenges for Tamils in Sri Lanka
Tamils in Sri Lanka face several significant challenges, including:
- Recognition
of Eelam Tamils’ Indigenous rights in Sri Lanka: The political and
social landscape of Sri Lanka's Northern and Eastern provinces has been
shaped by decades of conflict and controversy, particularly surrounding
the recognition of Tamil people's rights. Central to this discourse is the
need to address Indigenous rights, self-determination, and the historical
ties of Tamil communities to their land.
- Urge
to uphold and respect the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous
Peoples (UNDRIP): The UNDRIP is a landmark international instrument
that establishes minimum standards for the survival, dignity, and
well-being of Indigenous peoples. Recognizing Indigenous peoples'
inherent rights to their lands, cultures, and self-governance, the
declaration outlines various provisions, including:
o
Article 3: Affirms the right of
Indigenous peoples to self-determination. This includes the freedom to
determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social, and
cultural development.
o
Article 4: Stipulates that Indigenous
peoples have the right to autonomy and self-government in matters relating to
their internal and local affairs, alongside means for financing these
autonomous functions.
o
Articles 25-32: Address rights related to
lands, territories, and resources, emphasizing the importance of maintaining
spiritual and cultural relationships with their ancestral lands.
The declaration was adopted by the UN General Assembly with
overwhelming support, although some countries, including Canada, initially
voted against it. Canada eventually lent its support in 2010 and in 2016
committed to implementing the declaration without qualification, signalling
a significant shift in its stance on Indigenous rights.
Legal and Policy Frameworks
Several legislative efforts have been undertaken in Canada to align its
laws and policies with the principles of the UNDRIP:
·
Bill C-15: Enacted in 2021, this bill
affirms the application of the UNDRIP in Canadian law and commits the
government to take concrete actions toward its implementation.
·
Treaty Rights: The recognition of
historical treaties and the negotiation of modern treaties continue to be
central to advancing self-determination for First Nations.
·
Land Claims: Settlements and agreements
aimed at resolving disputes over land ownership and usage play a crucial role
in empowering Indigenous communities.
- Land
Rights and Displacement: The legacy of the Armed Conflicts has left
many Tamils displaced and struggling to reclaim their land. Land grabs
under the guise of archaeological initiatives and military occupation
continue to affect Tamil communities 1.
- Political
Marginalization: Despite promises of devolution and constitutional
reform, Tamil communities often find themselves politically marginalized,
with limited representation and influence in government decisions 2.
- Economic
Disparities: The Northern and Eastern provinces remain less developed
compared to other regions, with limited access to economic opportunities
and infrastructure 2.
- Human
Rights Violations: Tamils continue to face human rights abuses,
including militarization, repression, and restrictions on freedom of
expression and assembly 2.
- Cultural
and Linguistic Discrimination: Policies favouring the Sinhalese
language and culture have led to the erosion of Tamil cultural and
linguistic identity 2.
Conclusion Summary
The historical and political context of the Northern and
Eastern provinces of Sri Lanka underscores the importance of prioritizing the
Tamil people's right to self-determination and land rights. The debate over
merging or demerging these provinces is secondary to recognizing the Tamil
people's deep-rooted historical and cultural connection to the land. Addressing
this core issue is essential for achieving a just and equitable solution for
all communities in Sri Lanka. By overcoming the challenges faced by Tamils,
such as land rights, political marginalization, economic disparities, human
rights violations, and cultural discrimination, a more inclusive and peaceful
future can be envisioned for the country.
REFERENCES’
1.
SAMSN. (n.d.).
Northern and Eastern Provinces, Sri Lanka: Legacy of Conflict. Retrieved from
https://samsn.ifj.org/northern-and-eastern-provinces-sri-lanka-legacy-of-conflict/
2.
Oakland Institute.
(n.d.). The Destroyed Land, Life, and Identity of the Tamil People in Sri
Lanka. Retrieved from
https://www.oaklandinstitute.org/sites/oaklandinstitute.org/files/endless-war-web.pdf
3.
Wikipedia. (n.d.).
Sri Lankan Tamils. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SriLankanTamils
4.
Sangam. (n.d.).
De-merger: Lessons for the Future. Retrieved from
https://sangam.org/taraki/articles/2006/11-06_Demerger.php
5.
Wikipedia. (n.d.).
Indo-Sri Lanka Accord. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-SriLankaAccord
6.
LawNet. (n.d.).
Wijesekera and Others v Attorney General. Retrieved from
https://lawnet.gov.lk/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/006-SLLR-SLLR-2007-V-1-WIJESEKERA-AND-OTHER-v.-ATTORNEY-GENERAL.pdf
7.
Wikipedia. (n.d.).
Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution of Sri Lanka. Retrieved from
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ThirteenthAmendmenttotheConstitutionofSri_Lanka
8.
SpringerLink.
(n.d.). Right to Self-Determination Under International Law. Retrieved from
https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-319-68846-6_673-1
9.
United Nations.
(n.d.). United Nations Charter. Retrieved from
https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter/full-text
10.
OHCHR. (n.d.).
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Retrieved from
https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights
11.
OHCHR. (n.d.).
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Retrieved from
https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-economic-social-and-cultural-rights
12.
Princeton
University. (n.d.). The Princeton Encyclopedia of Self-Determination. Retrieved
from https://pesd.princeton.edu/node/511
13.
Daily FT. (2025).
Political rupture in Sri Lanka: What lies ahead? Retrieved from
https://www.ft.lk/columns/Political-rupture-in-Sri-Lanka-What-lies-ahead/4-767677
14.
JURIST. (2025).
'The Basic Issue Is a Lack of Political Will': Land Rights and Reconciliation
in Sri Lanka. Retrieved from
https://www.jurist.org/features/2025/04/01/the-basic-issue-is-a-lack-of-political-will-land-rights-and-reconciliation-in-sri-lanka-interview-with-academic-mahendran-thiruvarangan/
15.
Drishti IAS.
(n.d.). Issue of Tamilians in Sri Lanka. Retrieved from
https://www.drishtiias.com/daily-updates/daily-news-analysis/issue-of-tamilians-in-sri-lanka
Comments
Post a Comment
We would love to hear your thoughts! Whether you have feedback, questions, or ideas related to our initiatives, please feel free to share them in the comment section below. Your input helps us grow and serve our community better. Join the conversation and let your voice be heard!- ABC Tamil Oli (ECOSOC)