Enduring Struggles, Evolving Voices: Tamil Indigenous Rights, Protest, and Political Advocacy in Sri Lanka, 2010-August 2025

Disclaimer

This report provides a comprehensive, evidence-based analysis of Tamil indigenous rights, public protest, and political advocacy in Sri Lanka from 2010 to August 2025. It draws from a wide array of web sources, news articles, legal judgments, parliamentary records, academic studies, and expert analyses. The content is intended strictly for informational, academic, and policy research purposes. While major efforts have been taken to ensure factual accuracy and a balanced account, some limitations are inherent due to barriers related to access restrictions, state censorship, potential media bias, evolving political dynamics, and the absence of some primary or classified data. No information herein should be interpreted as legal advice, official policy, or a definitive position of any institution. Readers are advised to corroborate information with primary sources for legal or operational decisions.

Editor’s Note

This report was conceived and structured to capture the rich, turbulent, and contested landscape of Tamil indigenous rights and public advocacy in post-war Sri Lanka. Recognizing both the gravity and sensitivities around these topics, the editorial approach prioritized multi-sided coverage, meticulous fact-checking, and thematic integration. Sources span government documentation, English-language and Tamil-language news outlets, diaspora publications, statements by NGOs and UN agencies, legal reports, and firsthand narratives from the Tamil homeland and diaspora hubs. Particular focus is placed on underreported domains-land rights disputes, legal test cases, government policy changes, diaspora mobilization, and international advocacy mechanisms. Instead of offering a single narrative, the report presents overlapping, and at times contested, perspectives aiming to facilitate a holistic understanding and stimulate further inquiry into the rights, recognition, and safety of Sri Lankan Tamils.

The significance of this topic remains ever-present, not only due to sustained contestation over rights and recognition inside Sri Lanka, but also because the global Tamil diaspora continues to shape international conversations on reconciliation, accountability, and ethnic minority protections. Editorial decisions sought to respect the lived experience, amplify marginalized voices, and draw connections between Sri Lankan developments and international norms and best practices for indigenous and minority rights.

Methodology

Source Selection and Data Collection

This report takes a multidisciplinary, comparative, and web-intensive approach, aggregating credible data across several major domains:

·        Official Legal Documents and Policy Texts: The review encompassed landmark legal documents, including rulings by Sri Lanka’s Supreme Court on language and land rights, Gazette notifications on land acquisitions, legislative amendments such as the 13th Amendment, and the use (and promise of reform) of the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA)¹².

·        Human Rights Reports and Multilateral Mechanisms: Reports and statements by the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), Human Rights Watch (HRW), Amnesty International, the Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka (HRCSL), Minority Rights Group International, as well as international submissions to bodies such as the UN Human Rights Council (HRC), the Committee Against Torture, and the International Criminal Court (ICC), have been closely reviewed²³.

·        Parliamentary, Policy, and NGO Documentation: The methodology incorporates debate packs, parliamentary debate transcripts, government releases, and published studies (e.g., from Oxford Brookes University, JURIST) focused on legal and political reforms, as well as expert interviews⁴⁵.

·        Media and Civil Society Sources: In addition to international and national news outlets (e.g., The Guardian, Al Jazeera, The New Indian Express, BBC, CBC News, Daily Mirror), coverage from Tamil Guardian, Tamilwin, Lankasri, Brampton Tamil Association, and diaspora-led organizations was included for event-driven and grassroots perspectives⁶⁷⁸⁹.

·        Academic and Think Tank Analyses: The report synthesizes recent academic work on Sri Lankan post-war politics, ethnic power-sharing, indigenous status debates, and the role of international legal norms. Examples include peer-reviewed studies on language politics, land restitution, and the evolving strategies of Tamil political parties⁵.

Validation and Analytical Procedures

Data was triangulated whenever possible; official statements and Gazette publications were checked against field reporting, NGO documentation, and academic review. All major claims-especially those involving direct accusations of abuse, legal changes, or protest outcomes-were cross-verified with at least two independent sources. Special care was taken to include Tamil-language news where available, with translation support for key events or perspectives often omitted in English-language coverage ¹⁰¹¹.

Thematic Structuring

Material was coded across the following themes, which were then mapped chronologically and comparatively:

1.        Evolution of Tamil Indigenous Rights in Sri Lankan Law

2.        Public Protests and Mobilizations by Tamil Communities

3.        Political Advocacy Groups and NGOs Supporting Tamil Rights

4.        International Legal Frameworks and UN Mechanisms

5.        The Tamil Diaspora and Transnational Networks

6.        Land Rights and Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC)

7.        Media Coverage and Information Control

8.        Legal Challenges and Court Cases

9.        Government Policy Responses and Legislative Changes

10.   Threats to Human Rights Defenders

11.   Impact of International and Domestic Reports

12.   Diaspora Case Study: Mullivaikkal Monument Protests

13.   Emerging Trends in Tamil Political Representation

14.   Academic Scholarship on Rights, Sovereignty, and Reconciliation

---

Key Web and Documentary Sources

The analysis systematically incorporates content from:

·        The OHCHR and UN News for global legal norms and Sri Lanka-specific recommendations ².

·        Parliamentary debate packs and official statements from the UK and Canadian governments on Tamil rights and commemorations¹².

·        Sri Lanka’s own legal and human rights institutions, such as the HRCSL, and relevant Supreme Court decisions¹³.

·        Peer-reviewed and policy research papers from academic and think tank literature on historical grievances and policy evolution¹⁴.

·        Real-time field and diaspora reporting from diaspora news and advocacy platforms, e.g. Tamil Guardian, Tamilwin, Lankasri, Brampton Tamil Association, as well as documentation of monument protests and memorialization events¹⁵⁹.

No paywalled or subscription-only data was used unless directly referenced and acknowledged as publicly accessible in parliamentary or government documentation¹⁶.

Evolution of Tamil Indigenous Rights in Sri Lankan Law (2010-2025)

Since the end of the Sri Lankan armed conflict in 2009, the landscape of Tamil rights and their recognition as indigenous or a distinct minority with collective rights has undergone incremental, often politically charged transformations. International legal principles such as the right to self-determination and Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) have increasingly shaped advocacy and policy debates, with the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) cited as a benchmark for the protection of Tamil land, culture, and language rights.

The Constitution of Sri Lanka, as amended by the 13th Amendment (1987), formally recognizes Sinhala and Tamil as national languages and, in theory, provides for devolution of power to provincial councils. In practice, challenges around implementation, ongoing military presence in the north and east, persisting centralization, and the lack of real autonomy have limited self-governance for Tamil-majority regions¹⁷. The Supreme Court ruling upholding the constitutional right to use Tamil in the National Anthem while also protecting broader linguistic rights marked a significant victory, although activist groups continue to report gaps in delivery and persistent deviation from constitutional guarantees ¹³.

By mid-2024, the government had announced plans to introduce fresh legislation aimed at the broader protection of Sri Lanka's indigenous communities. However, this bill primarily focused on the Veddas, with Tamil groups pointing out that any indigenous rights framework should also address the historical and collective claims of the Tamils, given their unique political, cultural, and territorial identity dating back millennia¹⁸.

Tamil claims for FPIC have been sharpened in dialogues with global institutions. The 2025 address by UN High Commissioner Volker Türk to the EMRIP session was widely referenced by Tamil advocates as underscoring two pillars: genuine self-governance and the right to consent to or veto any policy, land expropriation, or development project affecting their historic homeland. The enduring contest over ancestral lands is reflected in continuing legal battles, with the Supreme Court in June 2025 halting a major land grab in the north through direct legal intervention-a highly symbolic, if still partial, victory¹.

In parallel, legal mechanisms such as the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) and its proposed replacements have been points of major contention. Despite calls for the PTA’s repeal due to its widespread use against Tamils and Muslims-including the arbitrary arrest and detention of protesters, journalists, and politicians, the new government under President Anura Kumara Dissanayake has so far only pledged to limit, not repeal, its application¹⁹.

Notably, there has also been a marked trend toward using land rights litigation as a form of resistance against state-led land acquisition in Tamil areas, often on grounds of “conservation,” “archaeology,” or “public need.” The superior courts have at times ruled in favour of claimants, but many cases are still pending. Fundamental rights applications have tested the boundaries of constitutional protections for minorities, notably in education and cultural policy spheres¹⁴.

Public Protests and Mobilizations by Tamil Communities

Post-2010 Sri Lanka has witnessed a renewed-and in many ways, reimagined-wave of Tamil-led public mobilizations. With the physical elimination of the LTTE, new forms of protest emerged: legal resistance, civil disobedience, hunger strikes, commemorations, and international lobbying²⁰.

Within the island, rallies and protest camps demanding the return of lands-such as those organized by communities in Kepapulavu, Mullaitivu, and around the Palali-Achuveli high-security zones-have become emblematic. Women, particularly mothers of the disappeared, have spearheaded protests commemorating the disappeared and challenging state inaction. These gatherings have often been met with police bans, surveillance, and the criminalization of participants; protests marking the International Day of the Disappeared have been repeatedly restricted by judicial order or police action, on supposed security grounds²¹.

Activists have employed forms of protest that draw deep from local experience-a blend of silent vigils, mass fasts, media briefings, drone-facilitated documentation, and “kanji” (rice porridge) distributions serving as collective living memorials to those killed or missing. Symbolic acts, such as rebuilding bulldozed genocide memorials at the University of Jaffna, have led to repeated confrontations with authorities⁸.

Diaspora solidarity continues to define the transnational reach of Tamil protest. The 2009 Gardiner Expressway shutdown in Toronto set a precedent for mass mobilization-“watershed” moments that inspired younger generations to pursue legal and political careers, foreground Tamil issues in North American civil discourse, and push for legislative recognition of the Tamil genocide¹²⁹. Protests in London, Geneva, Ottawa, Sydney, and Chennai, often synchronized with May 18 Mullivaikkal commemorations, amplify Tamil voices and demands for international justice²². The 2025 inauguration of the Tamil Genocide Monument in Brampton, Canada, and the defence of Ontario’s Tamil Genocide Education Week Act against legal challenges, signal both the scope and consequence of diaspora activism¹².

Political Advocacy Groups and NGOs Supporting Tamil Rights

The terrain of Tamil advocacy in the post-war period is crowded, diverse, and increasingly transnational. Core Tamil political parties have historically included the Ilankai Tamil Arasu Kachchi (ITAK), Tamil National Alliance (TNA), All Ceylon Tamil Congress (ACTC), and an array of community-based organizations and diaspora networks. While the TNA dominated Tamil politics throughout most of the 2010s, the alliance began fracturing by the mid-2020s, with member parties like TELO and PLOT supporting other candidates, reflecting growing dissatisfaction and new calls for united Tamil leadership ahead of elections²³.

Parallel to formal party structures, organizations such as the People’s Alliance for Right to Land (PARL) have articulated Tamil and Muslim land claims through a lens of identity, stewardship, and reparation. NGOs, including the World Tamil Movement (France), ABC Tamil Oli (ECOSOC),  Ottawa Tamil Association (OTA), Tamil Rights Group (TRG), National Council of Canadian Tamils (NCCT), and PERL have advanced legal strategies in Canada and Europe, pushing for universal jurisdiction and accountability for war crimes²⁴. The Minority Rights Group International and the Society for Threatened Peoples have also played supporting roles in monitoring, documenting, and escalating cases at the United Nations and ICC⁴.

Efforts to create coalitions among caste and religious minorities-such as plantation Tamils and Muslims-demonstrate both the intersectionality and challenges of minority advocacy in Sri Lanka’s majoritarian landscape. Critics are quick to point out the limitations of party-based advocacy, underscoring the persistent lack of devolution, the fragmentation of representation, and the challenges posed by “southern” (Sinhalese) parties entering Tamil constituencies without addressing core grievances²⁵.

NGO advocacy and legal initiatives have helped shift accountability debates; the HRCSL, Amnesty International, and OHCHR reports have all underscored continued state impunity, militarization, and repression of protest. Human rights lawyers acting for Tamils face harassment, travel bans, and ongoing professional risk, which hinders access to justice and freedom of association for the communities they represent²⁶.

International Legal Frameworks and UN Mechanisms

The trajectory of international engagement on Tamil rights has been marked by a mix of disappointment, hope, and strategic recalibration. Global legal norms-especially FPIC, self-determination, and transitional justice-are frequently invoked by Tamil actors in submissions to the UN, ICC, and human rights tribunals.

OHCHR and the UN Human Rights Council reports persistently highlight “historic opportunity” for Sri Lanka to end impunity, urging independent mechanisms for accountability, land restitution, and repeal of draconian laws like the PTA. The mandates of the UN Accountability Project and the extension of OHCHR’s evidence-gathering by the HRC, despite Sri Lanka’s objections, represent ongoing avenues for international pressure and documentation²¹.

NGOs and diaspora advocates have repeatedly called for the referral of Sri Lankan cases to the ICC, as well as economic and travel sanctions on implicated officials. In Canada, legislative gains such as Parliament’s recognition of Tamil Genocide Remembrance Day and the Canadian Supreme Court’s dismissal of a challenge to genocide education legislation offer models for symbolic and substantive international advocacy¹².

Despite this, Sri Lanka consistently rejects bilateral or international mechanisms, favouring flawed domestic commissions (e.g., the 2024 Bill for a Truth, Unity and Reconciliation Commission) that are widely criticized by victim groups and international monitors as lacking independence or teeth²¹⁹. The cycle of failed domestic processes, combined with continued repression of memorial activities, has entrenched mistrust among Tamil communities and advocates for greater external enforcement of international legal norms.

Role of the Tamil Diaspora and Transnational Networks

The post-war years have seen the maturation and expansion of Tamil diaspora activism. As refugees and immigrants settled in Canada, the UK, Australia, Europe, and India, they established robust networks, advocacy platforms, and public memorials that influenced policy both locally and globally. Diaspora groups have provided funding, legal representation, lobbying expertise, and public education, forming a bridge between homeland struggles and international attention²⁷²⁰.

Diaspora organizers were instrumental in both commemorative activism (e.g., Mullivaikkal Remembrance Day in Toronto, Brampton Genocide Monument, rallies in Geneva and Chennai) and in leveraging the legal systems of their resident countries (e.g., universal jurisdiction petitions in Europe, Canadian court challenges)¹². These efforts have not only ensured international spotlight but have also galvanized new generations-particularly diaspora youth-toward political mobilization, education, and cultural preservation²⁸.

The importance of the diaspora was recognized at major gatherings such as World Tamil Diaspora Day in Chennai, which reinforced the linkage between transnational activism and efforts in Sri Lanka. Diaspora support for homeland civil society and educational institutions, as well as their role in defending against erasure of memory and identity, is widely acknowledged²⁰.

However, the diaspora’s activism has not gone uncontested; Sri Lankan government responses have included attempts to monitor, discredit, and disrupt diaspora-led memorialization and advocacy. This includes pressure on social media companies to censor Tamil Guardian and other outlets, and diplomatic objections to labelling events and monuments as “genocide” commemorations ⁹.

Land Rights and Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC)

Of all issues facing Sri Lankan Tamils, the struggle over land remains the most symbolic and contentious. Despite repeated pledges by multiple governments to return lands confiscated during the war, progress has been piecemeal, with thousands of acres still under military or state agency occupation in the north and east²⁹¹⁷.

Case studies reveal a cyclical pattern: pledges to return land ahead of elections, limited symbolic releases (such as the partial reopening of the Palali-Achuveli road), and new rounds of acquisition-often justified under forest or archaeological policies. The March 2025 Gazette notification for land appropriations in key war-affected villages triggered sustained community protests and legal challenges, with local politicians warning of escalation if the decision was not reversed³⁰.

Interviews and research by academics such as Mahendran Thiruvarangan of the University of Jaffna exposed both the scale of dispossession and the bureaucratic and political obstacles to redress-including tussles between civil authorities and the military, and the lack of political will at the national level. Promises by President Dissanayake and the National People’s Power (NPP) coalition to return land and conduct local elections have thus far fallen short of substantive progress, fueling renewed mobilization by affected communities and activists ⁵.

FPIC remains a core principle in rights advocacy, with Tamil civil society and NGOs invoking it to contest government projects and interventions in the north and east-particularly those funded by international donors or claiming “development” rationales. The disconnect between rhetorical commitments to FPIC and the ground reality of marginalization and militarization continues to drive protest and international escalation.

Media Coverage and Information Control

The media environment in Sri Lanka remains fraught, especially for Tamil journalists and outlets reporting on protests, land issues, enforced disappearances, and state violence³¹²⁶. Since 2010, dozens of Tamil media workers have been killed, dozens more subjected to arrest, interrogation, and online harassment, and many forced into exile. Anti-terror laws, the Online Safety Act of 2024, and targeted censorship of social media (including repeated suspensions of Tamil Guardian accounts) have effectively chilled critical reporting-even as civil society organizations and the UN warn of encroaching self-censorship ⁷.

The government’s crackdown on information is especially focused on commemorative events (e.g., Heroes Day, Mullivaikkal Remembrance), protests, and investigations into land acquisition and corruption. Field journalists such as Selvakumar Nilanthan have faced multiple summons, harassment, and threats to family members-part of a broader pattern of intimidating those who challenge dominant state narratives³²³³.

International watchdogs such as Reporters Without Borders (RSF) and Freedom House have consistently rated Sri Lanka as “partly free” and marked by impunity when it comes to attacks on journalists, with particular concern for media working in the north and east ⁷.

Legal Challenges and Court Cases on Tamil Rights

Landmark legal battles have shaped, and at times protected, Tamil interests since 2010. The Supreme Court’s intervention in June 2025 to halt a 6,000-acre land grab was both a rare win and a testament to the tenacity of activists and local politicians such as MP Sumanthiran, who continue to use courts as a critical venue for resistance ¹.

Other important cases include disputes over the right to sing the national anthem in Tamil, legal challenges around the demolition of memorials, and the judicial defence of provincial councils’ authority-with mixed success. The courts’ rulings often reflect both constitutional protections for minority languages and the practical constraints imposed by state practices and political pressures.

At the international level, legal recognition of genocide and the right to truth has advanced with Ontario’s Tamil Genocide Education Week Act and the upholding of these rights by Canada’s Supreme Court. These successes fuel ongoing efforts to establish universal jurisdiction and pursue legal accountability for crimes committed during and after the war, even as practical justice and reparations remain elusive for most victims¹².

Government Policy Responses and Legislative Changes

While policy rhetoric around reconciliation, equality, and justice has become more prominent, actual legislative and administrative action has been halting and frequently contested by civil society and Tamil parties. President Anura Kumara Dissanayake’s campaign promises to return land, revive war-torn economies, and empower local councils were welcomed by some voters. However, limited delivery-especially on land restitution and constitutional reform-has led to diminished support, with Tamil nationalist parties regaining ground in the 2025 local elections²³.

The government’s ambivalence is also seen in its handling of the PTA, Online Safety Act, and regulatory controls over NGOs. While there has been dialogue on repealing and replacing the PTA, the law continues to be used to harass activists, stifle dissent, and regulate NGO activity-especially in the north and east¹⁹³². Regulatory demands for registration and vetting by the Ministry of Defence have created barriers to advocacy and increased suspicion of civil society as “foreign-influenced” or “anti-state” activity.

The implementation of the welfare schema (e.g., Aswesuma), while more inclusive in principle, has failed to capture many of the most marginalized, including Malaiyaha Tamils in the plantations and those displaced by war or economic change¹⁹.

Safety and Reprisals against Human Rights Defenders

Activists, journalists, and ordinary community members in Tamil-majority areas remain at high risk of harassment, intimidation, detention, and violence. UN Special Rapporteur Mary Lawlor’s forthcoming 2025 report singles out the disproportionate violence, surveillance, and stigmatization faced by rights defenders-especially women-in the north and east³³.

Cases abound of police harassment, late-night home visits, threats to family members, and judicial orders banning or restricting protest. Notably, families of the disappeared-most often mothers-are subject to questioning and surveillance for their engagement with the UN and for public remembrance actions²¹.

Human rights defenders like Selvakumar Nilanthan, as well as lawyers representing Tamil claimants, face threats ranging from smear campaigns to arbitrary detention under anti-terror laws. The persistence of such patterns, despite international reporting and advocacy, underlines the state’s prioritization of surveillance, militarization, and coercion over meaningful reconciliation or truth-seeking²⁶³².

Impact of International and Domestic Reports

Annual reporting cycles by international organizations play a key role in shaping the global perception of Sri Lanka’s post-war trajectory. Reports by Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Minority Rights Group, and the UN HRC routinely document persistent impunity, lack of meaningful accountability, intimidation of activists, and continued economic and social exclusion of Tamils³⁴.

Such documentation has tangible effects: the extension of OHCHR’s accountability mandate, critical coverage in foreign parliaments, and the application of economic leverage by donor agencies and multilateral lenders. Nonetheless, the gap between reporting and on-the-ground change remains substantial. Many in the Tamil community view the proliferation of reports in the absence of concrete action as a source of frustration-even as they remain vital for maintaining global awareness and pressure.

Case Study: Mullivaikkal Monument Protests in the Diaspora

The destruction of the Mullivaikkal memorial at Jaffna University ignited outrage and triggered a new round of diaspora activism focused on memorialization and countering state attempts at erasure⁹. The successful establishment of the Tamil Genocide Monument in Brampton was a watershed, serving as an internationally visible site for remembrance and education.

These developments, while celebrated by the diaspora and many local governments, have also exposed ongoing tensions with Sri Lankan state actors and Sinhalese nationalist groups. Objections lodged by the Sri Lankan diplomatic mission in Canada, as well as attempted disruptions by genocide denialists, are reminders of the contested nature of public memory and the stakes involved in owning, interpreting, and preserving history ⁹.

Emerging Trends in Tamil Political Representation

Elections since 2010 have seen a dynamic reconfiguration of Tamil political participation. While the National People’s Power (NPP) made significant inroads in the north and east in 2024, the 2025 local government polls revealed a swing back to Tamil nationalist parties, especially ITAK, amid disillusionment with unfulfilled promises from southern parties ²⁵⁴. Issues of land, justice, and devolution continue to drive voter preferences, with local parties that promise to center these grievances gaining support.

The fragmentation and realignment of Tamil parties-exemplified by the fracturing of the TNA-reflect broader debates within the community about strategy, unity, and engagement with the state. Calls for a common presidential candidate and renewed emphasis on local, independent mobilization suggest a coming phase of reassertion of Tamil agency and vision at both local and national levels³⁴.

Academic Scholarship on Tamil Indigenous Rights

Recent academic research on Sri Lanka’s ethnic conflict and its aftermath provides critical frameworks for interpreting present realities. Studies on language policy, land dispossession, militarization, reconciliation failures, and diaspora mobilizations document both the historical continuity of Tamil marginalization and the evolving forms of resistance and advocacy. Scholarship highlights the persistent gap between legal commitments and actual rights delivery-themes mirrored across policy, media, and activist reports⁵²⁰.

Of note is the increasing integration of international legal analysis (e.g., on self-determination and FPIC) into both local and diaspora activism, as well as the focus on intersectionality-caste, religion, gender, and class-within Tamil communities and politics⁵.

Conclusion

Fifteen years after the end of major hostilities in Sri Lanka, the struggle for Tamil rights remains a site of vibrant, complex, and fraught contestation. While the war’s physical violence has receded, new forms of dispossession, surveillance, and marginalization have emerged. The last decade and a half have seen both advances-in legal recognition, international advocacy, and diaspora influence-and ongoing, often intensifying, challenges in land rights, political participation, and safety.

Public protest and advocacy, both at home and abroad, have driven legal and legislative change, preserved cultural memory in the face of erasure, educated new generations, and kept international attention focused on justice and reconciliation. Yet, the cycle of promise and disappointment persists: government pledges are too often undercut by slow or selective implementation, a lack of accountability, and continuing repression of dissent.

What emerges from the evidence is clear: enduring struggles and evolving voices define the post-war Tamil experience in Sri Lanka. Justice, autonomy, and cultural survival remain at the heart of community aspiration and collective action. The future trajectory of these battles-in courts, at polling booths, in public squares, and across global networks-will determine not only the fate of Sri Lanka’s Tamils but also the capacity of the country as a whole to transcend its legacies of division and conflict.

---

---

References (37)

1. Sri Lanka Supreme Court Stops Land Grab From War-Affected Tamils. https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/sri-lanka-supreme-court-stops-land-grab-from-war-affected-tamils-8775858

2. World Report 2025: Sri Lanka . https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2025/country-chapters/sri-lanka

12. Case dismissed - Canada’s Supreme Court rejects challenge to Tamil .... https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/case-dismissed-canadas-supreme-court-rejects-challenge-tamil-genocide-education-week-act

13. Sanjeewa Sudath Perera and two others vs. H.E. Maithreepala Sirisena .... https://www.cpalanka.org/sanjeewa-sudath-perera-and-two-others-vs-h-e-maithreepala-sirisena-sc-fr-67-2016-fundamental-rights-application-challenging-the-tamil-version-of-the-national-anthem/

3. ‘Impunity remains entrenched’ - Amnesty International slams Sri Lanka’s .... https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/impunity-remains-entrenched-amnesty-international-slams-sri-lankas-human-rights-record

4. Decisive leadership needed to ensure changing minority political .... https://minorityrights.org/sri-lanka-report/

5. 'The Basic Issue Is a Lack of Political Will': Land Rights and .... https://www.jurist.org/features/2025/04/01/the-basic-issue-is-a-lack-of-political-will-land-rights-and-reconciliation-in-sri-lanka-interview-with-academic-mahendran-thiruvarangan/

10. Tamilwin - தமிழ்வின் Sri Lankan Tamil News Website . https://tamilwin.com/us

6. Tamilwin - தமிழ்வின் Sri Lankan Tamil News Website . https://tamilwin.com/srilanka

7. Freedom House highlights Sri Lanka’s attempts to censor Tamil Guardian. https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/freedom-house-highlights-sri-lankas-attempts-censor-tamil-guardian

8. Tamil Genocide Monument Unveiled in Brampton (Canada) to Honour Victims .... https://tamilculture.com/tamil-genocide-monument-unveiled-in-brampton-canada-to-honour-victims-and-preserve-memory

9. After 3-year delay, Brampton finalizes design for Tamil monument to .... https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/after-3-year-delay-brampton-finalizes-design-for-tamil-monument-to-honour-lives-lost-in-sri-lankan-civil-war-1.7128205

11. Lankasri - Tamil News Website . https://lankasri.com/

14. Sri Lanka’s Policy Approach toward the Tamil Minority: A Critical Review. https://www.inspirajournals.com/uploads/Issues/160180704.pdf

15. Tamil Genocide Monument inaugurated in Brampton. https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/tamil-genocide-monument-inaugurated-brampton

16. Sri Lankan Tamils and human rights. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CDP-2023-0217/CDP-2023-0217.pdf

17. Return of land will take Tamils in Sri Lanka, wounded by conflict .... https://www.newindianexpress.com/world/2024/Dec/16/return-of-land-will-take-tamils-in-sri-lanka-wounded-by-conflict-closer-to-peace

18. Sri Lanka to Introduce New Law for Indigenous Community. https://ceylondailynews.lk/home/2024/08/28/indigenous-community/

19. Human rights in Sri Lanka Amnesty International. https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/asia-and-the-pacific/south-asia/sri-lanka/report-sri-lanka/

20. Politics After a Ceasefire: Suffering, Protest, and Belonging in Sri .... https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/D89886ZN

21. Sri Lanka: Police Target Families of ‘Disappeared’. https://www.hrw.org/news/2025/08/20/sri-lanka-police-target-families-of-disappeared

22. Protests against the Sri Lankan civil war - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protests_against_the_Sri_Lankan_Civil_War

23. Tamil nationalist parties surge in local polls as NPP loses votes in .... https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/tamil-nationalist-parties-surge-local-polls-npp-loses-votes-north-east

24. Tamil Rights Group - International Advocacy Group - Markham, Canada. https://www.tamilrightsgroup.org/

25. Horu versus Boru: The politics of the 2025 local government elections .... https://polity.lk/harindra-b-dassanayake-and-rajni-gamage-horu-versus-boru-the-politics-of-the-2025-local-government-elections-in-sri-lanka/

26. Continued harassment against Sri Lankan human rights defender and .... https://www.frontlinedefenders.org/en/case/continued-harassment-against-sri-lankan-human-rights-defender-selvakumar-nilanthan

27. Tamil diaspora activism in the post-liberal international order. https://www.iss.nl/en/news/tamil-diaspora-activism-post-liberal-international-order

28. A 'watershed' moment: How the 2009 Gardiner shutdown inspired a .... https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/a-watershed-moment-how-the-2009-gardiner-shutdown-inspired-a-generation-of-tamil-leaders-1.5130342

29. Sri Lankan President Anura Dissanayake Promises to Return Tamil Lands .... https://ceylondailynews.lk/home/2024/11/11/anura-dissanayake-tamil-lands/

30. Sri Lankan government moves to seize Tamil lands in Mullivaikkal. https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/sri-lankan-government-moves-seize-thousands-acres-around-mullivaikkal

31. Sri Lanka: RSF is alarmed by attacks on freedom of information as .... https://rsf.org/en/sri-lanka-rsf-alarmed-attacks-freedom-information-presidential-election-looms

32. Sri Lanka: Civic space restrictions and targeting of activists persist .... https://monitor.civicus.org/explore/sri-lanka-civic-space-restrictions-and-targeting-of-activists-persist-as-new-government-takes-power/

33. Rights defenders in North-East labelled as terrorists - UN Special .... https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/silenced-and-stigmatized-struggles-human-rights-defenders-sri-lanka

34. TNA Fractures as Tamil Parties Unite Behind Candidate. https://lankasara.com/news/tamil-national-alliance-ehind-common-presidential-candidate/