Sencholai Massacre: "Their Dreams Were Bombed—But Not Forgotten"

Sencholai Massacre

Shattered Innocence, Unbroken Resolve

"Their Dreams Were Bombed—But Not Forgotten"

 Disclaimer

This report is intended for informational and advocacy purposes only. The views and interpretations expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of any organization. Readers are encouraged to consider the sensitive nature of the content and to approach the material with empathy and respect for the victims, survivors, and their families.

---

Editor’s Note

We honour the dignity of every girl who lost her life or was injured at Sencholai. Our commitment is unwavering in seeking truth, justice, and accountability for the victims, survivors, and relatives. This report stands as a testament to their stories and a call to action for the international community to uphold human rights and prevent future atrocities.

---

Methodology

• Desk Research
  Reviewed primary documents from UNICEF, the Sri Lanka Monitoring Mission, UN statements, and official government releases.
• Survivor Testimonies
  Analyzed first-hand accounts published by independent human rights groups and diaspora organizations.
• Legal Framework Analysis
  Examined relevant international treaties, customary international humanitarian law principles, and child-rights conventions.
• Media and Scholarly Sources
  Consulted reputable news outlets, peer-reviewed articles, and reports from non-governmental organizations to corroborate facts.
• Limitations
  Restricted access to on-the-ground verification in Mullaitivu District; reliance on available translated materials may introduce interpretive nuances.

 Author

Wimal Navaratnam
Human Rights Activist
Brampton, Canada

A Call for Justice and Remembrance of the 61 Schoolgirls Lost to War: The Sencholai Massacre of 14 August 2006

Introduction

On August 14, 2006, the Sencholai Massacre unfolded as one of the gravest war crimes against Tamil civilians in the decades-long Sri Lankan civil conflict. At approximately 7:30 AM, four Sri Lankan Air Force (SLAF) Kfir jets bombed the Sencholai children's home for war-affected girls in Vallipunam, Mullaitivu District. The assault killed at least 53 school girls and three staff members, while more than 150 were injured-many maimed for life. These young women, aged between 16 and 20, had gathered for a two-day workshop on first aid and disaster management, intended to broaden their capacity to help their war-affected communities[2].

This massacre not only shocked Sri Lanka’s Tamil community but also galvanized international condemnation and long-standing calls for justice. Overshadowed by denials, misinformation, and an entrenched culture of impunity, Sencholai remains a crucial case study in the failures of civilian protection, the deadly consequences of state impunity, and the protracted struggle for justice and recognition for Tamil victims.

This report provides a comprehensive timeline of the Sencholai events, analyzes violations of international humanitarian law (IHL), examines the Sri Lankan state’s response, documents reactions from international organizations and Tamil advocacy bodies, and highlights survivor testimonies, trauma, and the legacy of the massacre in relation to ongoing demands for truth and accountability.

Timeline of Events: The Sencholai Massacre

A detailed timeline of the Sencholai Massacre reveals the build-up, execution, and aftermath of the attack:

Date/Time	Event Details
August 10-13, 2006	Over 400 school girls from across Mullaitivu and Kilinochchi districts gather at Sencholai for a 10-day workshop on first aid and disaster management[2].
August 14, 2006, ~7:30 AM	Four SLAF Kfir jets conduct a bombing raid, dropping 16 bombs in repeated passes over the Sencholai children's home, a designated humanitarian zone[4].
Immediately after the bombing	Dozens of girls and staff are killed instantly; approximately 150 injured, with witnesses reporting severed limbs, burns, and life- threatening injuries[2].
August 14-15, 2006	Local hospitals are inundated. UNICEF, SLMM truce monitors, and local officials arrive to provide aid and assess the scene[4].
August 14-16, 2006	The Sri Lankan government claims the target was a Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) training camp. Independent monitors and UN officials dispute this[5].
August 15-21, 2006	Survivors are hospitalized; three severely wounded girls transferred to Kandy hospital outside the war zone, are detained by police, with one dying in custody[2].
August-September 2006	News of the massacre draws massive protests and memorials in Sri Lanka, Tamil Nadu, the Tamil diaspora, and among human rights organizations worldwide[5].
September 2006 onwards	Despite calls for an investigation, Sri Lankan authorities refuse to open an independent inquiry; international condemnation continues[4].

Each stage of the massacre’s unfolding underscores its deliberate, premeditated character and the complex web of medical, legal, and social crises that followed. The coordinated nature of the airstrikes was confirmed by the monitoring mission’s findings: clear bombing craters, lack of military installations, and an unexploded bomb at the site highlighted the calculated nature of the attack, tragically refuting any possibility of "collateral damage"[1][2].

Violations of International Humanitarian Law (IHL)

Sencholai in the Framework of IHL

The attack on the Sencholai children’s home constituted blatant violations of multiple tenets of international humanitarian law (IHL) and the Geneva Conventions-core instruments developed to protect civilians during armed conflict.

Key violations include:

▪         Targeting of Civilians and Protected Premises: The Geneva Conventions expressly prohibit the targeting of civilians and civilian objects, including schools and orphanages, in both international and non-international armed conflicts. The Fourth Geneva Convention, which Sri Lanka is a signatory to, clearly mandates the protection of children and the designation of humanitarian zones for non-combatant safety[7][8].

▪         Disproportionate and Indiscriminate Use of Force: Available evidence-including on-site assessments by the Sri Lanka Monitoring Mission (SLMM) and UNICEF-demonstrates there was no military presence at Sencholai, nor any military activity. The dropping of multiple fragmentation bombs designed for broad-area lethality in a setting full of unarmed minors constitutes both indiscriminate and disproportionate force[5][10].

▪         Failure to Take Precautions or Verify Targets: The repeated aerial passes and the lack of advance warnings or attempts to verify the nature of the target further breach IHL’s prescription that all feasible steps be taken to verify that objects of attack are military objectives and to minimize civilian harm[10].

▪         Denial of Aid and Mistreatment of Survivors: Arrests and mistreatment of wounded survivors violate protections for the sick and wounded under the Geneva Conventions. Detaining, interrogating, and restricting the movement of injured minors from a bomb attack is illegal under international law[8][2].

Expert opinions emphasize that:

“We see repeated failures to respect schools and hospitals... Doctors and humanitarian workers are constantly under attack, humanitarian relief assistance is blocked, and the International Committee of the Red Cross continues to be denied access to many of those in detention”[7].

Legal Status:

The repeated nature of such attacks, the scale of civilian loss, and the inability of the state to provide any credible military justification have led many international legal scholars and human rights organizations to assert that the Sencholai Massacre meets the threshold for a "grave breach" of international humanitarian law, and may constitute a crime against humanity or even genocide, given the targeted nature against Tamil civilians[11].

The Sri Lankan Government’s Response

Denial, Justification, and Lack of Accountability

Immediately following global outrage, the Sri Lankan government engaged in a multi-pronged response:

Denial of Civilian Status:

Government spokesmen initially denied the bombing had taken place.

Later, they insisted the site was a "terrorist training camp," and that all present were LTTE cadres or recruits, despite all independent and local evidence to the contrary[2].

Refusal to Investigate:

·        Officials including Keheliya Rambukwella and Brigadier Athula Jayawardene publicly stated there was no need to investigate the bombing because the girls were considered combatants under training, regardless of age or gender.

·        The government refused calls for an independent inquiry, writing off international concern and scrutiny as biased, or as part of a "terrorist propaganda campaign"[12].

Manipulation of Evidence:

·        The government released dubious satellite footage to journalists purporting to show military activity at the site, yet independent review revealed no evidence of a military camp.

·        Arrests of wounded survivors were paraded as proof of LTTE involvement, despite confessions being obtained under duress and in conditions of detention and medical neglect[12].

Intimidation and Retaliation:

·        Survivors transferred to government hospitals outside the war zone were detained and interrogated. At least one died due to medical neglect under police custody; others were not allowed proper family access or released into community care for almost two years^[12].

Systematic Impunity:

·        No officials have been held accountable. Sri Lanka's domestic investigations-including those by the Udalagama Commission-were marked by delays, witness intimidation, failure to subpoena key officials, and ultimately served to exonerate the military and government^[13].

Official Narrative Versus Independent Findings

This policy of blanket denial has been further entrenched through the country’s ongoing refusal to cooperate fully with UN-mandated accountability mechanisms, the rejection of international evidence-gathering bodies, and continued efforts to censor or delegitimize dissent at home. As recently as 2025, Sri Lankan governments have reiterated their rejection of UN Human Rights Council resolutions mandating investigations and accountability measures[15].

International Reactions and Civil Society Response

United Nations and Humanitarian Agencies

UNICEF: The UN children's agency sent staff to the scene, provided fuel and supplies to hospitals, and issued unequivocal statements affirming the civilian status of the victims. Executive Director Ann M. Veneman labeled the victims "innocent children," and Colombo chief Joanna VanGerpen stated, "we don't have any evidence that they are LTTE cadres...these children were from surrounding communities"[5][4].

UN Secretary-General: Kofi Annan was “profoundly concerned at the rising death toll including reports of dozens of students killed in a school as a result of air strikes in the northeast”[1].

SLMM monitors: Head of the Norway-led Sri Lanka Monitoring Mission, Ulf Henricsson, reported: "We couldn’t find any sign of military installations or weapons. This was not a military installation, we can see [that]." SLMM found over 10 bomb craters and an unexploded bomb at the site[5][4].

International Organizations & Monitoring Bodies

Tamil National Alliance (TNA): The island's largest Tamil political party issued a blistering condemnation: "The heavy aerial bombardment on the premises clearly indicates that the

attack was premeditated, deliberate and vicious... not merely atrocious and inhuman-it clearly has a genocidal intent. It is yet another instance of brazen State Terrorism"[16].

▪         Tamil Nadu State Assembly (India): Unanimously adopted a resolution denouncing the attack as "uncivilized, barbaric, inhumane and atrocious." Major Indian political parties and the Dalit Panthers of India staged walkouts in protest at Delhi’s silence[1][17].

▪         Swiss Government: Described the bombing as "an outrage"[1].

▪         International and Regional Protests: The Tamil diaspora, international civil society, and student federations organized protests and vigils in London, Geneva, Oslo, Palermo, Durban, and major South Indian cities. Memorialization has become a crucial part of the Sencholai legacy[18].

Despite these outcries and well-documented evidence, political pressures and the realpolitik interests of major states resulted in muted to non-existent condemnation from crucial actors- namely, the US, UK, EU, and Japan-the so-called "peace process co-chairs"[4].

Survivor Testimonies and Personal Accounts

Harrowing Eyewitness Reports

Juliet, survivor and student of Paranthan Hindu Mahavidyalam:

"As the bombs fell, the girls ran in all directions and took cover by lying on the ground face down, hoping that the bombers would go away after attacking once. But the Kfir jets returned, firing additional munitions directed at our facility.

There was chaos...with each round of bombing, as more students were wounded and killed. In between air strikes, the girls changed cover locations by running to take better cover. Many died on the spot, many were wounded, most had multiple injuries, some lost their limbs, and some had severe burns. All the girls were pleading for help, pleading to be taken to a hospital.”[19][20].

Meena, near the blast site, recalls for TAG:

"The noise and the terror were overwhelming...We lay on the ground until the Kfirs had dropped their last bomb and flown away. News began to filter through that Sencholai compound had been hit...some of her closest friends were among those wounded and struggling for their lives. One died of her injuries. To this day, what was hardest was not the physical injuries, but the deep mental anguish”.

Kala Singam, 19-year-old survivor:

“Even if our wounds heal in the years to come, the mental trauma, and the deeper wounds in our hearts will never heal. We saw people die in front of us; we stood by vulnerably watching them die, unable to do anything. ... Now [our parents and friends] live in constant fear... We’ve become completely dependent on others... Something has to be done so the next generation doesn’t end up like us. Please do something."[20].

Gendered Impact and Ongoing Trauma

The systematic targeting of young women at Sencholai has been documented by scholars and activists as part of a gendered dimension to the violence. Tamil women, already subject to disproportionate levels of sexual violence, found their trauma compounded; some survivors could not return to school or community activities for years, and many require daily assistance for even basic living[19].

Details of Casualties, Injuries, and Medical Treatment

Summary Table: Immediate Physical Impact

 

Description	Estimated Number	Details
Killed (officially confirmed)	53-61 schoolgirls, 3-4 staff	Almost all young women aged 16-20, attending a first aid and disaster management workshop
Seriously injured	Over 150 (up to 160+)	Shrapnel wounds, burns, traumatic amputations, and blindness; a range of injuries reported
Hospitalized	Over 130	Many required transfer to specialized hospitals; three girls lost legs, one lost an eye
Survivors arrested/detained	3	Arrested by police after transfer outside the war zone; one died in custody, two detained for months/years
Minor injuries/trauma	Scores affected	Many more suffered minor shrapnel wounds, permanent scars, and psychological trauma

Medical and Logistical CrisisHospitals in Mullaitivu, Puthukudiyiruppu, and Kilinochchi were overwhelmed by the influx of casualties. Scarcity of medical supplies, the destruction of health infrastructure, and the ongoing military siege created preventable deaths and worsened injuries. A few survivors with complex injuries were transferred to Kandy and Vavuniya hospitals, only to be detained instead of treated, one ultimately dying due to medical negligence. The disruption of proper medical pathways is highlighted as a secondary IHL violation, compounding the human cost[2][12].

Psychological Trauma and Social Impact

Long-Term Psychological Effects

Mental health impacts among survivors, their families, and wider Tamil society are severe and enduring, as evidenced by recurring PTSD symptoms, night terrors, chronic anxiety, and widespread survivor guilt[21].

▪         Child and Adolescent Mental Health: Studies on children in emergencies (e.g., by UNICEF) show that exposure to catastrophic violence like Sencholai predicts lifelong agitation, reduced cognitive and social development, and increased risk for depression, substance abuse, self-harm, and even suicide[21].

▪         Community-Level Scarring: The massacre, amplified by state denial and absence of justice, has contributed to a "scar in the psyche of the Tamil people." Anniversaries are met with renewed trauma, but also with renewed insistence on memory and recognition.

Social Consequences

Many of the wounded require permanent assistance for daily life. Numerous survivors fell behind in their education due to lengthy hospital stays, inability to concentrate, or social stigma. The attack deepened the dependency of war-affected women on caregivers-parents, extended family, or even humanitarian organizations-hindering their participation in the workforce and educational opportunities[20].

Gendered Dimension: With the majority of victims being girls, the impacts include both the

destruction of future women leaders and trauma rooted in the history of sexual violence against Tamil women throughout the conflict[11].

Psychological First Aid and Support

Initial support included emergency counseling by UNICEF and ad hoc services by NGOs, but protracted conflict and persistent insecurity made long-term interventions difficult. Many survivors have yet to receive meaningful psychological care, and the social stigma surrounding mental health in the region remains a further barrier[21].

Humanitarian Support and Assistance for Survivors

Responses at the time:

▪         UNICEF: Provided counseling support for the injured and bereaved, immediate supplies to overburdened hospitals, and safe spaces for affected children. Funding constraints and limited access, however, hindered sustained support[21].

▪         North East Secretariat on Human Rights (NESOHR): Provided documentation, advocacy, and attempted legal support for families facing arbitrary detention of survivors[2].

▪         NGOs and Community Organizations: Offered ad hoc medical care, counseling, and mobilized local volunteers for first aid and hospital support. Scouts, teachers, and neighbors

played critical roles for months after the attack. Later, Tamil diaspora organizations collected funds, circulated stories, and lobbied for international attention.

Despite these efforts, a combination of military obstruction, state suspicion, and persistent threat of violence against aid workers sharply limited the reach and effectiveness of humanitarian support-further deepening survivors’ dependence and entrenching their trauma.

Legal Accountability Efforts and Investigations

Domestic Mechanisms

▪         Presidential Commissions and the Udalagama Commission: An eight-member Commission of Inquiry led by Justice Nissanka Udalagama was nominally tasked to investigate the Sencholai bombing and other high-profile human rights cases. The Commission heard incomplete and problematic testimony, was hamstrung by lack of witness protection, and exonerated the military based on statements from survivors who were detained under duress[13].

▪         Lack of Prosecutions: No security forces personnel nor commanders have ever been charged, let alone convicted, for the Sencholai attack. Domestic legal processes have been widely criticized as lacking independence and subject to government manipulation.[23].

International Mechanisms and Pathways

Given the failures of domestic avenues, advocacy has focused on international justice. But significant barriers remain:

▪         ICC and the Rome Statute: Sri Lanka is not a party to the International Criminal Court. The only way to reach ICC jurisdiction would be a referral by the UN Security Council, a political impossibility due to likely vetoes by China and Russia[24].

▪         ICJ and State Responsibility: No state has yet brought Sri Lanka before the International Court of Justice over Sencholai, despite the gravity of the crimes and the clear obligations under the Genocide Convention. The lack of a "state champion" for the Tamil cause is a major obstacle, in stark contrast to recent successful cases on Myanmar or Israel[23].

▪         Universal Jurisdiction: Efforts to invoke this principle, which allows states to prosecute grave crimes regardless of where committed, have so far failed to yield prosecutions of Sri Lankan officials, due largely to immunities, evidentiary barriers, and lack of political will. However, organizations such as ECCHR and survivors’ groups continue to press cases in Germany, Switzerland, the UK, and North America[23][24].

United Nations and Evidence Preservation

Recent years have seen the UN Human Rights Council create a dedicated evidence-gathering mechanism for Sri Lanka-the Office of the High Commissioner’s Sri Lanka Accountability Project. This body collects and preserves evidence of war crimes, for use in future prosecutions both internationally and in states exercising universal jurisdiction[11].

Key obstacles remain:

▪         Strong state resistance to international investigations,

▪         Political and diplomatic shielding by major powers,

▪         Ongoing lack of witness protection and secure international access.

Memorialization, Advocacy, and the Legacy of Sencholai

Annual Commemoration and Censorship

Sencholai’s impact endures through sustained remembrance:

▪         Commemorations: Each year on August 14, survivors, families, and communities gather in Vallipunam and globally to memorialize the murdered children. Ceremonies include flower- laying and lighting of lamps at the memorial arch near the site, with political leaders, activists, and youth organizations in attendance[25].

▪         Repression of Memory: Successive Sri Lankan governments have systematically tried to block memorial events, arresting participants, cordoning roads, and censoring coverage. Families have been prevented from even laying flowers at the massacre site, further compounding their trauma and reinforcing the sense of impunity[18].

Diaspora Mobilization and Advocacy

The Sencholai massacre retains tremendous symbolic power among the Tamil diaspora, serving both as a rallying cry for justice and a key historical reference in campaigns for self- determination and recognition of genocide. Organizations around the world, from the UK and Canada to South Africa and Australia, stage protests and educational events on each anniversary, actively lobbying international bodies and states for action on accountability[5].

Documentation and Education

Lists of victims’ names, survivor accounts, and photographic evidence are widely circulated, both in print and online, as both testimony and a tool for political advocacy. Such archiving is critical for intergenerational memory and for the ongoing international legal efforts now being attempted via UN evidence preservation initiatives[5][2].

Civilian Protection, Impunity, and Justice: The Broader Context

The Failure of Civilian Protection

The Sencholai Massacre exemplifies the systemic failure to protect Tamil civilians during Sri Lanka’s long civil war. Despite specific humanitarian zones, GPS coordinates being provided in advance to the military, and explicit warnings by humanitarian agencies, targeting of such spaces became commonplace. The destruction of Sencholai-targeting an orphanage and educational site during a non-military event-demonstrated an explicit disregard for civilian immunity under international law[4][10].

Entrenched Impunity

The massacre fits into a wider pattern of crimes-massacres of schoolchildren, clergy, and aid workers-carried out with state sanction and never prosecuted. Witnesses are routinely intimidated or silenced, commissions of inquiry are under-resourced or neutered, and international demands for accountability are obstructed by powerful allies and local political calculation[15][13].

This culture of impunity has, in the words of the UN human rights chief, created decades of suffering and undermined any real prospect for reconciliation, transitional justice, or non- recurrence of violence[22].

Global Justice Pathways: Limits and New Initiatives

The international justice system’s gaps-and the political obstacles to ICC or ICJ jurisdiction-have forced advocates to shift focus toward universal jurisdiction, targeted sanctions, and UN evidence preservation. While these measures are not a substitute for state accountability or meaningful prosecutions, they represent an evolving strategy of “justice in waiting”-maintaining hope that the international legal architecture and shifting politics will one day bring perpetrators to trial[11][24].

Conclusion: The Enduring Significance of the Sencholai Massacre

Nineteen years after the attack, the Sencholai Massacre remains emblematic not only for its immediate horror but also for the broader structural violence faced by the Tamil people in Sri Lanka. It stands as:

·        An irrefutable demonstration of state disregard for the fundamental laws of war and the rights of children and women;

·        A case study in the cycles of denial, misinformation, and systematic impunity that have allowed war crimes to go unpunished;

·        A source of collective trauma, gendered violence, and a wound that continues to throb in the psyche of both survivors and the wider Tamil nation;

·        A rallying point for survivors, families, activists, and international advocates who, deprived of justice at home, have mobilized to keep the memory and cause alive globally;

·        A flashing warning light on the limitations of the current international justice system, as well as a call to persevere in the face of setbacks, recognizing that justice and reparations, though delayed, remain a moral and political necessity.

The legacy of Sencholai is thus not only a story of loss, injustice, and impunity, but also of unbroken resistance-an insistence that the names, lives, and dreams of those young women must never be erased, and that the world must not forget its unfinished obligations to them.

Key Advocacy Demands Moving Forward:

·        Immediate and public acknowledgment by the Sri Lankan state of responsibility for the massacre.

·        Full cooperation with UN evidence-gathering mechanisms and the release of all records relevant to Sencholai and similar war crimes;

·        Urgent reforms for meaningful protection of witness and survivor rights to facilitate testimony;

·        Expanded international support for universal jurisdiction prosecutions and targeted sanctions on perpetrators;

·        Ongoing humanitarian, psychological, and material support for all survivors and affected families;

·        Guaranteeing the right to memorialize and teach about the massacre, free of censorship or intimidation;

·        Renewed and persistent pressure by civil society and the international community to ensure that the road to justice for Tamil victims is neither forgotten nor foreclosed[11][23].

 

“These children are innocent victims of violence. The world must not look away, and must not allow time or politics to erase their memory or obstruct justice” - Ann M. Veneman, UNICEF Executive Director[5][4]

 

References (26)

1.      Chencholai bombing - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chencholai_bombing

2.      Remembering the Sencholai massacre 19 years on . https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/remembering-sencholai-massacre-19-years

3.      Sri Lankan airstrike kills 55 girls . https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/sri-lankan-airstrike- kills-55-girls

4.      General Assembly - documents.un.org. https://documents.un.org/access.nsf/get?Open&DS=A/HRC/54/NGO/200&Lang=E

5.      As the 1949 Geneva Conventions Turn 75, We Might Ask Where Is Our .... https://www.graduateinstitute.ch/communications/news/1949-geneva-conventions-turn-75-    we-might-ask-where-our-repugnance-suffering

6.      Remembering Sencholai Orphanage Massacre « CTYA`s Blog. https://tamilyouth.ca/remembering-sencholai-orphanage-massacre/

7.      Improving Civilian Protection in Sri Lanka: Introduction. https://www.hrw.org/legacy/backgrounder/asia/srilanka0906/2.htm

8.      Sri Lanka’s Tamil Women Await Justice 16 Years Since War’s End.

https://www.hrw.org/news/2025/05/16/sri-lankas-tamil-women-await-justice-16-years-wars-  end

9.      The Commission acted as a deterrent: Justice Udalagama. https://www.sundaytimes.lk/090621/News/sundaytimesnews_16.html

10. The Need To Publish The Udalagama Commission Report. https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/the-need-to-publish-the-udalagama-    commission-report/

11. Sri Lankan security forces block Sencholai massacre commemoration in .... https://www.tamilguardian.com/index.php/content/sri-lankan-security-forces-block-    sencholai-massacre-commemoration-mullaitivu

12. UN says Sri Lanka has ‘historic opportunity’ to end ... - UN News. https://news.un.org/en/story/2025/08/1165647

13. Sencholai attack "pre-meditated, deliberate and vicious"- TNA. https://www.tamilnet.com/art.html?artid=19229

14. Outrage - and silence . https://www.tamilguardian.com/index.php/content/outrage-and- silence

15. செஞ்சோலை படுகொலையின் 19ஆம்ஆண்டு நினைவேந்தல் - ஜே.வி.பி நியூஸ். https://jvpnews.com/article/commemoration-of-the-19th-sencholai-massacre- 1755149469

16. Remembering The Sencholai Massacre - A Gendered Attack on Tamil Women. https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/remembering-sencholai-massacre-gendered-attack-     tamil-women

17. A Survivor’s Voice - Survivors of the Sencholai Aerial Attack Speak Out. https://tamilyouth.ca/a- survivors-voice-survivors-of-the-sencholai-aerial-attack-speak-out/

18. Mental health and psychosocial support in emergencies - UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/protection/mental-health-psychosocial-support-in-emergencies

19. Legal & Political Analysis- Sri Lanka and the Limits of International .... https://srilankacampaign.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Legal-Political-Analysis-Sri-Lanka- and-the-Limits-of-International-Justice-ICCICJ-and-Universal-Jurisdiction-2.pdf

20. Sri Lanka and the International Criminal Court - Tuck Magazine. https://tuckmagazine.com/2017/04/28/sri-lanka-international-criminal-court/

21. Sri Lankan civil war: Government officials still unpunished. https://www.ecchr.eu/en/case/sri- lankan-civil-war-government-officials-still-unpunished/