Windmill Project in Mannar, Sri Lanka: Environmental and Political Implications

Comprehensive Report: 

The Mannar Windmill Project in Sri Lanka-Environmental, Socio-Political, and Legal Perspectives


Disclaimer

This analytical report is intended for informational and academic purposes only. It draws upon a wide range of publicly available sources up to September 2025 and strives for accuracy and fairness without representing political, governmental, or commercial interests. The views expressed are those of the report’s author and do not necessarily reflect the positions of any referenced organizations, communities, or individuals. Users are recommended to independently verify referenced facts, consult subject-matter experts, and recognize the evolving context around the Mannar windmill project and its associated matters.


Editor’s Note

The ongoing windmill project in the Mannar region of Sri Lanka encapsulates a complex interplay of environmental significance, international relations, indigenous and minority rights, and questions about sustainable development. This report aims to provide a nuanced, up-to-date assessment based exclusively on credible, openly accessible sources. Readers should note that regional dynamics remain fluid, with project developments, policy shifts, and protests evolving rapidly. Citations are presented in APA style with hyperlinks wherever available in keeping with academic and professional standards12. This report is intended to serve researchers, policymakers, environmental advocates, and the general public interested in this pivotal issue.


Methodology

This report synthesizes information from a diverse corpus of sources including academic articles, government documents, independent news outlets, activist publications, legal analysis, and web resources from international organizations. Primary emphasis is placed on referenced materials published since 2009, focusing particularly on the environmental, political, and sociocultural dimensions of the Mannar windmill project.

The research approach includes:

·       Contextual analysis of the Mannar region’s environmental status and ornithological relevance;

·       Critical examination of project documentation, government policies, protest movements, MoUs, and international agreements;

·       Direct citation of source material using APA-style inline references with hyperlinks;

·       Triangulation of sources to ensure reliability and represent diverse stakeholder perspectives.

The report is structured into paragraphs under themed sections, with tables used sparingly and accompanied by explanatory commentary to ensure depth and clarity in all discussions3.


Environmental Characteristics of the Mannar Region

The Mannar region, located in the northwest of Sri Lanka, is distinguished by its arid coastal climate, extensive sand dunes, dry scrub forests, mangrove ecosystems, salt pans, lagoons, and the shallow waters of the Palk Bay and Gulf of Mannar4. The climate is semi-arid, with distinct wet (October-December) and dry (May-September) seasons, and only moderate rainfall compared to much of mainland Sri Lanka. The physical geography is characterized by flat landscapes and significant stretches of unspoiled coastline.

What sets Mannar apart is its mosaic of habitats supporting high biodiversity. The region is home to internationally recognized wetlands-such as Vankalai Sanctuary and Mannar Island Barefoot Sanctuary-underlining its ecological importance. Mangroves in Mannar form natural coastal defenses, reducing erosion and supporting livelihoods through small-scale fishing, making their conservation both an ecological and socioeconomic imperative4.

Critically, the unique combination of drylands, wetlands, lagoons, and salt marshes provides ideal stopover points for migratory birds. Sand dunes and rare plant communities support several threatened and endemic species. These environmental attributes have made Mannar an area of high conservation priority, frequently drawing the attention of conservationists, ornithologists, and policymakers5.

Beyond biodiversity, Mannar's environment is increasingly pressured by resource extraction, such as sand mining, and burgeoning renewable energy development activities. The overlay of ecological, economic, and social factors frames Mannar as a microcosm of Sri Lanka’s larger environmental dilemmas, underscoring the urgent need for balanced, science-informed policy-making.

"During his speech at the United Nations General Assembly, President Donald Trump criticized renewable energy, particularly wind turbines, calling them ineffective, costly, and unreliable for powering major facilities. In contrast, the U.S. Department of Energy acknowledges the high initial costs of wind turbines but points out they generally pay off over time."


Mannar’s Role in the Central Asian Flyway


Figure 1. Mannar’s extensive connectivity within the Central Asian Flyway showing the transcontinental migratory routes of Heuglin’s Gull (green) and Brown-headed Gulls (red) (Source: CAF-Sri Lanka Waterbird Tracking Project).

The landscape of Mannar is of extraordinary significance as a migratory bottleneck along the Central Asian Flyway (CAF), a principal corridor used by over 350 bird species moving between Eurasia and the Indian Ocean region6. Each year, millions of birds travel this ancient route, and Mannar-specifically its lagoons, mudflats, and sandbars-serves as an irreplaceable staging and refueling site for these travelers.

Mannar's wetlands and coastal habitats become especially vital during the harsh northern winters, offering shelter and nourishment for avian populations en route to Africa, India, or Southeast Asia. This congregation includes globally threatened waders, waterfowl, and raptors, for whom habitat degradation can trigger cascading declines across the CAF.

The region's importance has been formally recognized through listings under international conventions, including the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands and multi-lateral agreements aimed at safeguarding migratory species78. Conservationists warn that obstructions or disruptions at critical points along the flyway, like Mannar, can have severe repercussions for global migratory bird populations. This ecological context is foundational to protests regarding the windmill project, as interruptions or land conversion in Mannar may imperil the viability of the entire flyway.


Key Bird Species in Mannar

The ornithological richness of Mannar is exceptional, particularly during peak migration from September to March. The region hosts an array of rare and threatened species, underlining its biodiversity value:

Movement of 25 satellite-tagged individuals of shorebirds (in orange), seabirds (in dark blue) and ducks (in light blue) in Mannar Island within the period of tracking between 2020-2024 (Source: CAF-Sri Lanka Waterbird Tracking Project).

·       Greater Flamingo ( Large flocks are regularly observed in the region’s lagoons, especially at Vankalai Sanctuary and Mannar Island’s western mudflats.

·       Eurasian Curlew ( Both are significant for international conservation, with the Eurasian Curlew highlighted due to its Near Threatened status.

·       Lesser Sand Plover, Little Stint, Pacific Golden Plover: These shorebirds, nearly always present in dense numbers, depend on undisturbed mudflat habitats.

·       Northern Pintail, Common Teal, Garganey: Mannar’s waterfowl diversity swells during migration, with several species numbering in the tens of thousands9.

·       Indian Skimmer (rare visitor), Black-tailed Godwit, Marsh Sandpiper, Common Redshank: These highlight the region’s criticality for both globally common and regionally endangered birds.

·       Raptors: Osprey, Pied Harrier, and migratory falcons routinely pass through.

·       Resident Endemics: Sri Lanka Junglefowl, Brown-capped Babbler, and Lesser Whistling Duck enrich the avifaunal mix.

The presence of both endangered and endemic species underscores why environmental impact assessments for projects like the wind farm are contentious. Ecologists warn that without adequate bird-friendly siting and operational mitigation measures, wind turbines pose risks from habitat fragmentation, collision, and disturbance10.


Birdwatching Hotspots in Mannar


Mannar is widely regarded as a national and international birdwatching destination. Key birdwatching sites exemplify the region’s rich ornithological tapestry:

·       Vankalai Sanctuary: A Ramsar Wetland of International Importance, hosting up to 20,000 waterbirds at peak times, including flamingos, plovers, and stints8.

·       Mannar Causeway and Bridge: The shallow waters on either side of the causeway are magnets for migratory plovers, sandpipers, and pelicans.

·       Neduntivu (Delft) Island: Offshore, this larger island also provides breeding and foraging grounds for waterbirds and terns, albeit less contiguous than Mannar’s main sanctuaries.

·       Semakkulam Lagoon and Arippu Beach: Both are productive sites for shorebird observation, attracting local guides and international birders.

·       Keeri and Adams Bridge (Rama’s Bridge): Besides being of cultural and geological significance, these sandbanks are seasonal magnets for waders and seabirds9.

The combination of official sanctuaries and informal hotspots has fostered a burgeoning nature tourism economy. Birdwatching tours, eco-lodges, and guide services now form an important economic activity for local communities. Any infrastructural developments, especially those altering wetlands or causing sustained human activity, risk undermining these economic and ecological assets.


Overview of the Mannar Windmill Project

Mannar’s potential for renewable energy, particularly wind power, has attracted significant national and international attention over the past decade. Sri Lanka’s ambitious clean energy goals, aiming for 70% of energy from renewables by 2030, have directly influenced the prioritization of wind projects on Mannar Island and adjacent coastal areas11.

Project Scope and Objectives

The flagship initiative is the Mannar Wind Power Project, originally envisioned as a 100 MW facility and later expanded to a 300 MW development. The first phase-run by the state-owned Ceylon Electricity Board (CEB)-became operational in 2020, while further project phases have included international involvement, primarily Indian corporate entities.

Key milestones and parameters include:

·       Phase 1 (100 MW): Developed by Sri Lanka’s CEB, comprising 30 wind turbines along the southwestern coastline of Mannar Island. The project was designed with Asian Development Bank funding and technical inputs from multiple stakeholders12.

·       Future Phases (200-484 MW): Proposed expansions have involved considerable Indian investment, notably from the Adani Group (before its withdrawal), and new initiatives led by Indian state-owned companies as of 2024-202513.

Environmental and Community Concerns

Critically, environmental impact assessments and local consultations have become flashpoints. Civil society organizations, environmentalists, and Tamil community leaders have challenged the adequacy of bird collision risk modeling and the transparency of the approval process. The debate is further complicated by Mannar’s status as a vital node on global migratory flyways, as previously outlined.

Furthermore, project land acquisition and the potential displacement or restriction of local (primarily Tamil) communities have been deeply controversial, prompting ongoing protests. These protests have often focused on forms of participatory consultation, environmental oversight, fair compensation, and the broader question of community ownership over natural resources.


Ownership by Indian State Company

After the withdrawal of Adani Green Energy-India’s private sector giant-following mounting criticism and scrutiny over project transparency and environmental safeguards in early 2025, the Sri Lankan government signaled its intention to proceed with wind energy development through agreements with Indian state-owned enterprises1413.

The main Indian state-run entity now involved is the National Thermal Power Corporation Limited (NTPC), backed by the Indian Ministry of Power. Investment and operational responsibility for new capacity (potentially up to 484 MW) has shifted squarely to NTPC following the exit of Adani. This shift underscores an explicit shift toward direct bilateral energy diplomacy rather than reliance on private actors13.

Ownership by an Indian state company re-energizes debates around sovereignty, as Tamil civil society and local leaders argue that such arrangements risk undermining the autonomy of the Northern Province, historic Tamil homelands, and the broader agenda of post-war reconciliation and reconstruction. Opponents contend that preferential allocation of public assets to a foreign state company, without adequate local consent, can reinforce perceptions of dispossession and external domination15.


Sri Lankan Government Involvement

The Sri Lankan government has been an unequivocal advocate of rapid renewable energy deployment, positioning projects like the Mannar windmills as strategic infrastructure essential to energy security, foreign investment, and climate-smart growth16. Its role is threefold: project promoter, regulator, and interlocutor with international partners.

Despite this, critics accuse successive governments of insufficient consultation with affected communities. The fast-tracking of strategic projects under national emergency or economic revival schemes has sometimes bypassed conventional environmental and social review procedures. There are further claims of opaque land acquisition, and inadequate compensation or resettlement packages provided to Tamil residents.

Additionally, opposition parties and local representatives have charged the government with prioritizing diplomatic ties (especially with India) over community rights when evaluating and signing large-scale energy MoUs. Such perceptions feed into deeper debates about the balance between national interest, regional autonomy, and intercultural justice.


Indian Government Role

India’s involvement in Mannar’s windmill project arises out of layered motivations that span diplomacy, energy security, and regional geopolitics. Successive Indian governments have articulated support for Sri Lanka’s energy transition while emphasizing their stake in the stability and prosperity of the Tamil-majority areas, given both historical connections and domestic political calculations17.

Key facets of India’s role include:

·       Diplomatic facilitation: Indian embassies and high commissions often broker project facilitation, drive MoU negotiations, and mediate conflict when local opposition erupts.

·       Policy leverage: India’s central government sees energy investment in Sri Lanka (and particularly in the north and east) as a means to anchor its influence and stabilize the Indian Ocean region.

·       Balancing private and public investment: The Adani Group’s withdrawal and replacement by NTPC reflects India’s ability to modulate its engagement pathways in response to local and international criticism, signaling a flexible yet persistent approach to achieving its strategic aims.

Nevertheless, Indian involvement is rarely straightforward. While officially projecting itself as a partner in development and community upliftment, India faces skepticism from many Tamil Sri Lankans regarding the true beneficiaries of bilateral energy and infrastructure deals. There remain concerns that, in practice, agreements can sidestep local consultation, exacerbate resource tensions, and further fragment the cultural and environmental fabric of Tamil-majority regions.

Tamil Community Protests

Community protest forms a core part of the narrative around the Mannar windmill project. Grassroots mobilization against the project has grown since initial construction, intensifying with new phases and the shift in ownership to Indian state companies.

Recent protest highlights include:

·       Prolonged Demonstrations: Local communities, led by Tamil fishermen, farmers, and youth activists, have organized sit-ins, hunger strikes, marches, and road blockades since early 2024. In some cases, protests have continued for over fifty days without interruption18.

·       Main Concerns: Protestors cite land seizures, inadequate consultation, lack of transparency, and threats to environment and culture among primary grievances. Specific criticism centers on the failure to honor customary land rights and perceived attempts to dilute local autonomy.

·       Targeted Actions: While the main project site witnesses regular demonstrations, Tamil diaspora communities and student groups have staged solidarity protests in the capital Colombo and outside key international fora19.

·       Outcomes: Persistent local and international advocacy led to the revocation of a controversial land acquisition gazette in 2024, with government agencies compelled to review consultation protocols and environmental compliance measures20.

The protests connect to a broader discourse of minority rights, cultural survival, and historical justice in Sri Lanka's North, where memories of war and marginalization remain raw. Campaigners frame the windmill issue as a flashpoint in the struggle for genuine post-conflict reconciliation and participatory development.


Historical Context: Indo-Lanka Accord of 1987

Understanding the current windmill project also requires situating it within the broader historical and legal context of Indo-Sri Lankan relations, notably the Indo-Lanka Accord of 1987. This agreement, signed amid protracted civil conflict, committed both countries to devolving power to the Northern and Eastern Provinces, protecting Tamil cultural and linguistic rights, and refraining from unilateral territorial or policy changes without mutual consent2122.

Key aspects relevant to the Mannar context include:

·       Devolution of Power: The Accord stipulated that provincial councils, representing local interests, should play a leading role in administering land, natural resources, and development projects in the Tamil-majority North and East.

·       Protection of Land and Cultural Rights: It sought to prevent wholesale land alienation or demographic change that would adversely affect the region’s historic inhabitants.

·       Non-alienation without Consultation: The Accord obliges both governments to consult with each other-and, by implication, with local stakeholders-for decisions affecting the region’s territorial integrity or cultural landscape.

Despite these provisions, critics argue that successive governments have bypassed or neglected the Accord’s commitments, especially in the context of land acquisition and large-scale infrastructure projects. Legal scholars, Tamil leaders, and even some Sri Lankan judicial figures maintain that the principles of the 1987 Accord are germane to current disputes and warrant renewed enforcement and judicial scrutiny23.


Legal Framework on Territorial Integrity and Land Rights

Sri Lanka’s legal landscape governing land rights and development in the Mannar region is multi-layered, intersecting state and provincial laws with customary and international law. Key frameworks include:

·       State Lands Ordinance & Provincial Council Powers: Under Sri Lankan legal code, most land is formally state-owned, but the 13th Amendment (an outcome of the Indo-Lanka Accord) devolves significant powers-including over land and resource management-to provincial councils. In practice, however, there has been centralization and tension over implementation, particularly in the North and East24.

·       Customary and Community Land Rights: Local Tamil communities argue for recognition of customarily held lands, traditional fishing grounds, and inhabitation that predate colonial or modern state demarcations. Legal ambiguity often results in contested acquisition and compensation processes.

·       Environmental Law: Renewables projects are subject to Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) regulations. However, environmentalists and affected residents assert that EIAs are often cursory, lack transparency, or are conducted post-hoc for strategic projects15.

Legal controversies have also focused on the alleged use of emergency and economic powers by the central government to override regional consent or due process. Several community and advocacy groups continue to press their claims through the courts, local government bodies, and international human rights mechanisms.


List and Analysis of MoUs Signed Between India and Sri Lanka (2009-Present)

The period from 2009, marking the end of Sri Lanka’s civil war, has seen a proliferation of bilateral agreements in energy, development, security, and cultural exchange. Concerns about the potential for certain MoUs to impact Tamil community rights, resources, and identities are widespread and contentious. Below is a table summarizing the major MoUs, followed by detailed analysis of implications for Tamil rights and resources.


Table: Major India-Sri Lanka MoUs (2009-2025) With Potential Impact on Tamil Communities

Date

Title / Area

Purpose / Sector

Impact on Tamil Communities

Oct 2009

MoU on Power Sector Cooperation

Energy, Infrastructure

Potential land acquisition in Tamil-majority regions; energy export implications.

Jan 2012

Sampur Power Station MoU

Coal Power Plant, Trincomalee

Land, resource allocation in Tamil area; environmental risks; later canceled.

March 2013

MoU on Trincomalee Oil Tank Farms

Oil storage, Energy security

Resource/infrastructure control over historic Tamil lands.

April 2017

MoU on Economic Cooperation

Trade, Infrastructure, Energy

Proposed joint ventures in north/east; potential for local displacement.

April 2017

MoU on Community Development Projects

Housing, Education

Intended for war-affected Tamils; positive, but criticized for scope and sustainability.

July 2023

MoU on Economic Partnership

Cross-border trade, Digital, Energy

Opens up land/resource issues-especially with energy (wind, solar) in north and east.

Feb 2024

MoU on Renewable Energy Cooperation

Wind, Solar, Transmission

Major wind power projects in Mannar and Pooneryn; issues of land rights, consultation, and community impact.

July 2024

MoU on Maritime Security

Defense, Coast guard

Increased surveillance, occasionally cited as impacting Tamil fishing rights.

March 2025

MoU on Tourism and Cultural Heritage

Tourism, Archaeology

Potential for positive recognition of Tamil history but risk of commercialization without local gains.


The above selection is not exhaustive but represents some of the most consequential MoUs between the two countries, derived from governmental portals, Sri Lankan and Indian news outlets, and civil society analyses2526.


Analysis of MoUs’ Impacts on Tamil Rights and Resources

A close examination of the listed MoUs reveals recurring themes:

·       Resource Control and Land Acquisition: Energy and infrastructure MoUs (notably those on power, oil, and renewables) carry potential for large-scale land transfer, often in territory historically inhabited by Tamils. Civil society claims that these projects sometimes proceed without transparent community consultation or adequate compensation-a pattern echoing the criticisms of the contemporary windmill project1824.

·       Cultural Heritage and Identity: Cultural heritage and community development agreements offer potential benefits but can also spark concerns about who determines the scope of protection, which sites are prioritized, and whether commercial tourism leads to displacement or trivialization of local history.

·       Security and Livelihoods: Maritime security MoUs, while justified under anti-smuggling or anti-poaching frames, occasionally result in increased coast guard activity-leading to the confiscation of boats and limitations on fishing, an economic mainstay among Tamil coastal populations.

·       Implementation and Oversight: Numerous agreements, especially those targeting Tamil-majority areas for “development,” have been criticized for lack of local oversight, brief consultation periods, and infrequent reporting on tangible outcomes.

Activists, academics, and local leaders consistently call for meaningful participation in design, execution, and benefits-sharing mechanisms, as well as robust legal protections for land, environment, and cultural autonomy.


Synthesis and Thematic Conclusions

The Mannar windmill project serves as a case study in the tensions and opportunities presented by modern development at the intersection of biodiversity conservation, energy security, and post-conflict pluralism. The following key themes emerge:

·       Environmental Sensitivity and Irreplaceable Value: Mannar is unique as both a global bird migration bottleneck and a diverse ecological landscape. Any project compromising its wetlands, sand dunes, or migratory corridors threatens not just regional ecosystem health but the global CAF.

·       Bilateralism vs. Local Autonomy: The shift toward direct collaboration between the Sri Lankan and Indian governments, especially through state-owned Indian entities, raises questions about the balance of power, with many Tamils perceiving a democratic deficit in how land and natural resources are governed.

·       Historical Promises and Legal Complexity: The Indo-Lanka Accord and corresponding Sri Lankan legal reforms enshrine principles of devolution and collective rights. Nonetheless, in practice, centralization, piecemeal legal changes, and strategic project fast-tracking have undercut these safeguards.

·       Community Agency, Protest, and Resilience: Persistent protests in Mannar and other Tamil-majority areas signal a refusal to accommodate top-down, extractive development without meaningful consent. These movements represent a pushback against historical marginalization and a demand for true participatory democracy.

·       Geopolitical and Economic Imperatives: Both countries frame renewable energy partnerships as part of a larger agenda of regional integration and climate adaptation. However, unless community voices and environmental concerns are foregrounded, the risks of renewed conflict and ecological degradation remain palpable.

·       MoUs and Policy Monitoring: Ongoing scrutiny of bilateral agreements is critical to ensuring that development is inclusive, transparent, and attuned to the complex history and aspirations of the Northern Province’s people.


Conclusion

  • Core claim: The Mannar windmill project proceeds without recognizing Tamil territorial integrity and land rights, amid protests and police clashes reported by local communities. Tamils are urging India and Sri Lanka to halt the project immediately and to negotiate with elected Tamil representatives before any further actions.
  • Environmental risk: Mannar sits along the Central Asian Flyway and is a critical wintering ground for migratory birds; wind infrastructure must be assessed for impacts on avifauna, habitats, and ecological corridors.
  • Governance and law: The project could lead to violations of international law and conventions, including principles of self-determination and land rights. Tamil leaders must strategic pressures on India to honor commitments consistent with the Indo–Lanka Accord and recognition of Tamil identity and regional integrity (1987).
  • Action focus: Tamil leadership should urgently review post-2009 India–Sri Lanka MoUs—particularly those affecting the Northern and Eastern Provinces, security and intelligence cooperation, and sea/air domains—to identify and confront patterns of rights erosion and cultural/environmental harm.

The Mannar windmill project is emblematic of the dilemmas confronting regions balancing sustainable development, ecological stewardship, ethnic justice, and international partnership. The environmental and ornithological precariousness of Mannar calls for rigorous, scientifically grounded impact assessments and meaningful local consultation-practices that have, to date, proven inconsistent. Politically, the project exposes the fault lines of post-war reconciliation, autonomy, and the promise-versus-practice gap in implementing legal and constitutional safeguards.

Resolving these contradictions will require not only technical and diplomatic deftness but also a renewed social contract-one that respects ecological limits, acknowledges historical grievances, and empowers communities as rightful stewards of their lands, cultures, and futures.


End of Report


     In solidarity,

     Wimal Navaratnam

     Human Rights Advocate | ABC Tamil Oli (ECOSOC)

     Email: tamilolicanada@gmail.com


References (38)

1apastyle.apa.org

Webpage on a Website References - APA Style

2www.scribbr.com

How to Cite a Website in APA Style | Format & Examples - Scribbr

3writeanswers.royalroads.ca

Q. In APA Style, should URLs in references be hyperlinked?

4www.citewrite.qut.edu.au

QUT cite|write - How to write a report

5www.climatestotravel.com

Mannar climate: weather by month, temperature, rain - Climates to Travel

6www.undp.org

Mannar: A unique blend of birds, sand dunes and mangroves

7www.jetwingeco.com

Sri Lanka Nature Reserves | Bird Sanctuary in Mannar Sri Lanka

8www.seabirdtracking.org

Unsustainable Wind Energy in Mannar Threatening a Key Migratory ...

9www.lovesrilanka.org

Mannar Bird Sanctuary | Attractions in Mannar | Love Sri Lanka

10tlc.lk

Mannar Vankalai Bird Sanctuary - Bird Watching | Sri Lanka

11srilankansafari.com

Bird Watching Tours in Mannar Island | Bird Watching in Mannar Island ...

12ceylonroots.com

Birdwatching in Mannar - Ceylon Roots | Tour Operator in Sri Lanka ...

13news.mongabay.com

Respite, for now, for bird migration hotspot at heart of Sri Lanka’s ...

14www.ceb.lk

CEB | Business With CEB

15energymin.gov.lk

Mannar Wind Power Park (300 MW) - PowerMinistry

16ssrinitiative.org

“Mannar Wind Power Plant Project and Investment Paradox in Sri Lanka ...

17www.ft.lk

Govt. approves 20-year PPA with Adani for484 MW wind power ... - Daily FT

18www.dailymirror.lk

Still scope for india-Sri Lanka energy cooperation despite Adani ...

19www.dailymirror.lk

Adani’s global expansion faces scrutiny as company pulls out of Sri ...

20srilanka.factcrescendo.com

Did the NPP government cancel Adani Group’s proposed Wind Power Project ...

21island.lk

Mannar Island wind farms issue revisited – The Island

22www.power-technology.com

Power plant profile: Mannar Wind Farm- CEB1, Sri Lanka

23thecommunemag.com

PM Modi Reaffirms India’s Support And Commitment For Tamils In Sri ...

24www.thehansindia.com

In Sri Lanka, PM Modi reiterates India's strong commitment to ...

25www.tamilguardian.com

Mannar standoff - Protesters block wind power project equipment as ...

26www.tamilguardian.com

50 days of defiance in Mannar - Protest against wind turbines and sand ...

27tamilwin.com

மன்னார் காற்றாலை விவகாரம்: கொழும்பில் வெடித்த போராட்டம் ...

28www.tamilguardian.com

Sri Lanka revokes controversial land acquisition gazette following ...

29en.wikipedia.org

Indo-Sri Lanka Accord - Wikipedia

30sangam.org

The Indo-Srilanka Accord (1987) - Sangam

31peacemaker.un.org

Indo-Lanka Accord - peacemaker.un.org

32www.jurist.org

'The Basic Issue Is a Lack of Political Will': Land Rights and ...

33lst.lk

State Lands and Land Laws A Hand Book - lst.lk

34www.ft.lk

Mannar Wind Farm Project: Another folly like Sinharaja ... - Daily FT

35www.mea.gov.in

List of Outcomes: Visit of Prime Minister to Sri Lanka (April 04 - 06 ...

36island.lk

Seven MOUs exchanged between India and Sri Lanka covering multiple ...

37www.onlanka.com

Seven Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs) signed between India and Sri ...

38www.tamilguardian.com

Explained: The new India–Sri Lanka Defence Agreement



Comments