The Silenced Nation: Documenting Tamil Eelam’s Right to Self‑Determination and the Erasure of Identity in Post‑Colonial Sri Lanka.
Historical Context, Legal Foundations, and Advocacy Strategies
Editor’s Note
The following report presents an exhaustive, evidence-based
account of the Tamil struggle for self-determination, rooted in international
law and structured advocacy. Drawing on a wealth of academic, legal, and human
rights documentation, it endeavours to address both the historical and ongoing
violations faced by Tamils in Sri Lanka. This report is prepared for policy
advocates, legal professionals, and international institutions committed to
justice and the correct documentation of the Tamil people’s plight. All
references are documented in APA format with inline hyperlinks. The report
includes a robust methodology section, a disclaimer, and detailed footnotes as
per professional standards for human rights advocacy reporting.
In solidarity,
Wimal Navaratnam
Human Rights Advocate | ABC Tamil Oli (ECOSOC)
Email: tamilolicanada@gmail.com
Disclaimer
This report is a work of advocacy and research, synthesizing
information from diverse, credible sources, including academic research, human
rights data, legal records, and policy commentary. While all factual claims are
referenced, the report’s conclusions and advocacy recommendations represent
analytical interpretations by the authors. The information is intended to
empower responsible advocacy. It does not provide legal advice or substitute
for official proceedings before legal or judicial bodies. Readers and users are
encouraged to verify referenced materials and consult legal counsel for
specific applications.
Methodology
This report utilizes an interdisciplinary, qualitative
research design grounded in triangulation of sources. Primary materials
reviewed include historical records from the era of British decolonization,
transcripts of foundational Tamil political speeches, policy documents,
peer-reviewed articles, and current human rights monitoring reports. Extensive
reference to databases from international organizations, relevant Wikipedia
entries, legal archives, and Tamil civil society organizations ensures the coverage
of all key events and structural policies discussed. Official human rights
institution records, shadow reporting guides, and updates from advocacy
collectives inform recommendations and process sections. The APA style, with
inline hyperlink citations, is adhered to throughout for traceability. Careful
attention is given to recent developments (up to October 2025), ensuring
contemporary relevance to ongoing violations, legal arguments, and strategic
advocacy guidance.
1. Introduction: Context and Purpose
The Tamil question in Sri Lanka represents one of the
world’s most protracted and misunderstood struggles over self-determination,
national identity, and state-sponsored ethnic subordination. Since the formal
end of British colonial rule in 1948, Tamils-endowed with a historic,
territory-linked identity in the North and East-have systematically faced
marginalization, discrimination, and violence at the hands of successive
Sinhala-majority governments. Despite concerted efforts by Tamils to assert
their rights within and outside Sri Lanka, international law’s promise of
self-determination remains unrealized. This report unpacks the
multi-dimensional history of the Tamil struggle, underpinning the claim to
‘Distinct Nation’ status within Sri Lanka, and delineates actionable steps for
coordinated legal advocacy and documentation.
2. Historical Backdrop: Decolonization and Emergence of the Tamil National
Question
2.1. British Colonial Governance and the Pre-1948 Context
British colonial rule in Ceylon (now Sri Lanka), spanning
from 1815 to 1948, had profound effects on island demographics, ethnic
relations, and governance. The British, embracing divide-and-rule tactics,
recognized the island’s ethnic plurality, particularly the distinct
administrative regions of the Tamil-speaking North-East and the
Sinhala-majority South-West. These divisions, while contentious, reflected
long-standing civilizational and linguistic boundaries that predated
colonialism by centuries 1.
Colonial employment of Tamils in administrative posts,
driven by missionary education and English proficiency, gave Tamils an apparent
but resented advantage in bureaucracy and the professional class. However, the
struggle of Tamils was not born from colonial privilege but from the colonial
restructuring of ethnic boundaries and the subsequent Sinhala nationalist
response-giving rise to a distinct Tamil political consciousness upon
independence.
2.2. The Winds of Decolonization: 1948 and its Aftermath
The process of decolonization globally championed
self-determination, yet in Sri Lanka, the newly independent state in 1948 was
constructed on the majoritarian principle: independence arrived without
constitutional safeguards for minority nationalities. The Decision of the
British to transfer institutional powers wholesale to a Sinhala-majority
parliament without entrenched protections for Tamils catalyzed anxieties and
laid the foundation for subsequent conflict 1.
3. The Origins of Tamil Political Mobilization (1939-1948)
3.1. G.G. Ponnambalam and the "Fifty-Fifty" Proposal
One of the pivotal moments of Tamil political mobilization
occurred in 1939, when G.G. Ponnambalam, a key Tamil leader, addressed the
Ceylon State Council demanding a constitutional guarantee that would prevent
the marginalization of minorities. In his "Fifty-Fifty" proposal,
Ponnambalam advocated for a system in which elected representatives from the
Sinhalese majority controlled only half of the seats, with the remainder
reserved for minorities (Tamils, Muslims, and others) as a protective measure 2.
Ponnambalam’s rationale was strikingly forward-thinking:
recognizing the potentially catastrophic outcome of a unitary state dominated
by Sinhala-Buddhist ethnocracy, he articulated the concept of "one island,
two nations"-one Tamil, one Sinhala. The British, however, dismissed the
proposal, opting for a system that prioritized population majoritarianism over
negotiated pluralism. This led directly to the political exclusion, and
eventually ethnic subjugation, of Tamils in the post-independence era2.
3.2. Impact and Legacy of Early Tamil Mobilization
Although rejected, Ponnambalam’s proposal shaped Tamil
nationalist consciousness and is widely regarded as the precursor to subsequent
claims for regional autonomy and self-determination. Tamil leaders increasingly
articulated the need for constitutional guarantees and power-sharing
arrangements-demands that would be systematically disregarded by Sinhala
leadership, despite periodic negotiations in the 1950s and 1960s. The climate
of distrust paved the way for organized resistance and the emergence of militant
Tamil nationalism later in the twentieth century 2.
4. Post-Independence Discrimination: Class, Citizenship, and Linguistic
Engineering
4.1. Marginalization Through Citizenship Law
The first legislative act to disenfranchise Tamils
post-independence was the Ceylon Citizenship Act of 1948, a law that rendered
nearly a million Indian Tamil plantation workers stateless. The Act required
documentation impossible for most Indian Tamils to provide, immediately
stripping a significant segment of the Tamil population of citizenship, voting
rights, and social protections 3.
This deliberate exclusion of Indian Tamils-brought by the
British as laborers-became both an international scandal and a harbinger of
systematic efforts to redefine Sri Lanka as a state for the Sinhala-Buddhist
ethnonational group. The forced statelessness of Indian Tamils continues to
have repercussions in terms of socio-economic deprivation and human rights
abuses, despite later partial remedial measures 3.
4.2. The Sinhala Only Act and Language-Based Disenfranchisement
The passage of the Sinhala Only Act in 1956 marked the
institutionalization of Sinhala linguistic dominance. The law made Sinhala the
sole official language, effectively excluding Tamil from the entire apparatus
of state: education, law, administration, and public service
recruitment-despite Tamils constituting a historic people with established
homelands 4.
The Act led to mass Tamil protests, police repression, and
periodic riots. Sinhala-only policies deepened Tamil grievances, widened the
divide between communities, and cemented the status of Tamils as second-class
citizens within their supposedly shared polity. Subsequent legal amendments and
failed "reasonable use" clauses failed to reverse the damage or
restore linguistic parity 4.
4.3. Education Standardization: Structural Disadvantage
In the 1970s, the government of Sri Lanka introduced the
Policy of Standardization, ostensibly to resolve regional inequalities in
university admissions. In practice, these policies targeted Tamils by making
Tamil students compete for university places under stricter criteria compared
to their Sinhala counterparts.5
The effect was dramatic: Tamil representation in coveted
professional fields plummeted and upward mobility for Tamil youth was severely
restricted. The sense of educational dispossession further radicalized large
segments of the Tamil population and contributed to the loss of faith in the
unitary state model 5.
5. Illegal Military Occupation and Land Grabs in the Tamil Homeland
5.1. The Scale and Nature of Sri Lankan Military Occupation
While the cessation of open civil war in 2009 has been
marked as a turning point officially, the real situation in the Tamil homeland
remains one of occupation. The Sri Lankan military maintains an overwhelmingly
heavy presence in the North and East, with an estimated one soldier for every
six civilians in some districts-an occupation ratio vastly higher than any
other peacetime deployment globally 6.
Military camps, checkpoints, and surveillance installations
dot the landscape, making daily life for Tamils one of constant oversight,
harassment, and unease. The militarization impedes normal civil governance,
suppresses dissent, and allows for widespread impunity regarding human rights
violations-even long after the formal end of conflict 67.
5.2. Land Grabs, State Seizure, and Demographic Engineering
State-facilitated land appropriation in the North and East
of Sri Lanka is one of the most contested issues today. Mechanisms include
direct military occupation of civilian lands, declaration of "high
security zones" (HSZs), arbitrary acquisition under
"development" pretexts, and the gifting of confiscated lands to
Sinhalese settlers and state entities8.
|
Category |
Mechanism |
Primary Impacted
Communities |
Key Outcomes |
|
Military
Occupation |
High
Security Zones, Army Camps |
Tamils
(North-East residents) |
Displacement,
loss of livelihood, surveillance |
|
State Land
Grabs |
State
acquisition for "development", HSZs |
Tamil and
Muslim landowners |
Dispossession,
forced evictions, legal battles |
|
Illegal
Settlements |
State-sponsored
Sinhalese colonization |
Tamils |
Demographic
change, loss of political power |
|
Destruction
of Worship Sites |
Military/religious
encroachment on temples |
Tamil
Hindus, Christians, Muslims |
Loss of
heritage, identity erasure, violence |
The above table captures the diversity and complexity of
mechanisms used in the ongoing project of Sinhalization and demographic change
in traditional Tamil-majority regions. Land grabs go hand in hand with military
occupation: often, areas pacified militarily are then physically and
demographically re-engineered to erode the Tamil character of the region89.
The resultant population shifts and erasures amount to ethnic cleansing and lay
the groundwork for permanent disenfranchisement.
6. Destruction of Tamil Worship Sites and Cultural Heritage
The destruction of Hindu temples, Christian churches, and
Muslim mosques in the Tamil homeland is both a legacy of war and an ongoing
project of cultural erasure. Multiple reports document the systematic
demolition of ancient and modern Hindu temples-often replaced or overshadowed
by newly constructed Buddhist shrines, military structures, or state
institutions109.
Tamil religious and archaeological sites, some dating back
centuries, have faced vandalism, arson, and state-sanctioned encroachment,
frequently with non-Tamil religious symbols inserted forcibly into their
precincts11. Such acts are not merely collateral damage but are
widely viewed as intentional assaults on Tamil identity and spiritual
continuity, completing the project of territorial, demographic, and cultural
disenfranchisement in the North and East.
7. State-Sponsored Sinhala Settlements: Demographic Engineering
State-sponsored Sinhalese settlements in the North and East
constitute a deliberate effort to transform the ethno-geographic map of the
Tamil homeland912. These settlements are often established on lands
cleared during the war, forcibly seized from Tamils, or appropriated through
subsequent government orders. Settlers are provided with state aid,
infrastructure, and security, all at the expense of dispossessed Tamils who are
routinely denied the right to return or reclaim their properties.
This program aims at three outcomes: (1) breaking the
territorial continuity of Tamil-majority regions; (2) securing “buffer zones”
for a permanent Sinhala military presence; and (3) facilitating long-term
population change that undermines Tamil claims to historic nationhood,
collective rights, and self-governance. The scale and persistence of these
policies merit their recognition in international law as forms of illegal
demographic manipulation, collectively understood as ethnic cleansing912.
8. The Struggle for Justice: War Crimes, Genocide, and Crimes Against
Humanity
8.1. War Crimes During the Sri Lankan Civil War
The final stages of the Sri Lankan Civil War, culminating in
May 2009, witnessed mass atrocities, including extrajudicial executions,
indiscriminate shelling of civilian areas, enforced disappearances, arbitrary
detentions, torture, and sexual violence13. Independent
investigations, including those by the United Nations and prominent rights
organizations, have meticulously documented:
·
Deliberate attacks on civilian “No Fire Zones”
·
Shelling of hospitals and displacement camps
·
Execution of unarmed prisoners
·
Widespread sexual violence
·
Massive forced disappearances
These violations meet the threshold for crimes under the
Rome Statute and customary international law. Despite mounting evidence and
repeated UN mandates, genuine accountability (criminal prosecution or
reparative justice) for Tamil victims remains absent, blocked by layers of
impunity and international realpolitik137.
8.2. Allegations of Genocide
The question of genocide is forcefully raised in the Tamil
context. The systematicity, intent, and scale of atrocities-from premeditated
mass killings in 2009, anti-Tamil pogroms (1983, 1958, 1977, and others), to
ongoing policies of cultural and territorial erasure-provide compelling
evidence for a sustained campaign aimed, at minimum, at the destruction of the
Tamil community in part, if not in whole1415.
Multiple legal and investigatory bodies have debated the use
of the term “genocide” for what transpired in the Vanni region in 2009. There
is a broad scholarly, legal, and activist consensus that the cumulative acts of
killing (tens of thousands), forced starvation, civilian destruction, and
postwar disappearances fit the UN’s definition as acts of genocide or genocidal
intent, though powerful states have blocked formal recognition so far14.
8.3. Crimes Against Humanity and Crime of Aggression
For decades, Tamils have endured a pattern of
state-sponsored crimes that fit the definition of crimes against humanity:
widespread and systematic attacks directed against a civilian population,
including murder, deportation, torture, rape, and forced disappearances.
The Sri Lankan state’s use of military force against a
defined ethnic population, not in response to a generalized rebellion, but as a
tool of ethnic subordination and land seizure-fulfills many criteria of the
international crime of aggression. Assertions of state sovereignty are not
shields for acts that breach universal human rights norms and the laws of war716.
9. The Ongoing Reality: Structural Violence and State-Sponsored Ethnic
Cleansing
The current situation in the Tamil regions is one of structural, ongoing ethnic cleansing
through legal, economic, and security apparatuses. Key indicators include:
·
Ongoing
military occupation and surveillance
·
Systematic
land appropriation and denial of resettlement rights
·
Continued
destruction and "conversion" of Tamil worship sites
·
Barriers
to education, employment, and civic participation for Tamils
·
Legal
impunity for past and ongoing crimes against Tamils
·
Increased
Sinhalization of traditional Tamil areas
Numerous NGOs, UN special rapporteurs, and Tamil diaspora
organizations have issued urgent calls for international action, emphasizing
the deliberate nature of these policies and the existential threat posed to the
Tamil nation’s future within Sri Lanka17.
10. International Human Rights Institutions and the Suppression of the
Tamil Narrative
10.1. Gaps and Distortions in Official Narratives
A critical challenge in the Tamil struggle is the consistent
failure-or willful refusal-of international human rights institutions and
global databases to reflect the true scale, history, and intent of Sri Lankan
state actions against Tamils. Institutions often use state-supplied data or
officially sanctioned versions of events, which marginalize Tamil perspectives,
minimize or ignore evidence of crimes, and fail to recognize the collective
nature of Tamil grievances18.
This phenomenon is not accidental. The Sri Lankan state,
often aided by powerful partner governments (notably from the South Asian
region and beyond), orchestrates global narratives to present itself as a
functioning multi-ethnic democracy, downplay abuses as wartime excesses, or
stigmatize Tamils as “terrorists” or disloyal citizens. This process, known as
narratival engineering, is a form of epistemic violence-erasing or rewriting
the lived experience of Tamils18.
10.2. The Imperative for Shadow Reporting & Counter-Narrative
Documentation
Given the partiality and inadequacy of formal international
reporting, shadow reporting has
become a cornerstone of Tamil advocacy. Shadow reports-independent submissions
to UN treaty bodies, special rapporteurs, and international courts-provide
space for marginalized communities to document violations, contest state
accounts, and advance alternative legal and historical claims18.
Methods of shadow reporting include:
·
Collection of direct victim testimonies
·
Documentation of destroyed sites, property, and
land records
·
Analysis of demographic data and patterns of
forced resettlement
·
Legal verification of claims according to
international criminal, humanitarian, and human rights law
·
Use of photographs, satellite data, and
independent human rights investigations
Shadow reports help to counteract state narratives, call
attention to ongoing abuses, and ensure that institutional databases cannot
plausibly ignore the extent of state-sponsored oppression19.
11. The Case for Tamil Self-Determination and Distinct Nation Status in
International Law
11.1. Legal Foundations of Self-Determination
Self-determination is a foundational principle of modern
international law, articulated in the UN Charter, Common Article 1 of the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), as
well as customary international law20. The right applies not only in
the context of colonial liberation but also to people who, following
decolonization, are denied meaningful participation, subjected to gross
discrimination, and targeted for ethnic destruction.
Tamils possess all hallmarks of a nation-distinct language,
territory, culture, and historic polity in the North and East of the island.
The unremitting pattern of state aggression, disenfranchisement, and
demographic engineering provides legal grounds for claims of remedial secession
if internal self-determination remains unattainable-which has been the
consistent experience of Tamils since 194821.
11.2. Precedents and Comparative Perspectives
International practice includes several precedents (East
Timor, South Sudan, Eritrea) in which formerly colonial or internally colonized
populations, exercising the right to self-determination, have achieved
recognition as distinct nations and/or new states following patterns of
exclusion, atrocity, and state unwillingness to accommodate pluralism.
The Tamil struggle, rooted in decades of peaceful
negotiation, constitutional appeals, civil protest, and armed resistance only
as a last resort, aligns with these precedents. Absent meaningful, enforceable
guarantees for collective rights, self-determination remains both a right and,
increasingly, a necessity for group survival in the Tamil case14.
12. Advocacy Recommendations: A Pathway Forward
12.1. Coordinated Shadow Reporting and International Documentation
Effective advocacy demands that Tamil professionals,
lawyers, rights defenders, and political leaders coordinate the submission of
shadow reports and legal documentation to international human rights bodies:
Human Rights Council, Special Rapporteurs, ICC, and regional courts.
Best practices for
effective reporting include:
·
Joint preparation of legally vetted narratives
·
Use of rigorous evidentiary standards, verified
by legal professionals
·
Prioritization of victim-centric documentation,
with sensitivity to witness protection
·
Coordination with Tamil diaspora groups for
technical, linguistic, and archival support19.
12.2. The Case for a Centralized Tamil Legal Counsel and Legal Clinics
Dispersed, uncoordinated advocacy weakens the Tamil cause by
allowing narrative confusion, inconsistent demands, and resource fragmentation.
The establishment of a centralized Tamil Legal Counsel-a collective of
qualified attorneys and legal experts tasked with standardizing submissions,
representing collective interests internationally, and providing legal services
to Tamil victims-would address fragmentation and strengthen advocacy.
Such a structure would also facilitate:
·
Strategic litigation before international and
regional tribunals
·
Development of a centralized evidence and
documentation database
·
Policy advice on international standards and
process
·
Ongoing legal clinics in Tamil areas and
diaspora hubs19.
13. Conclusion
More than seven decades after independence, the fundamental
rights, dignity, and historic nationhood of Tamils in Sri Lanka remain under
existential threat. This is not just the legacy of colonial error or the
regrettable outgrowth of war, but the direct, ongoing product of deliberate
legal, political, military, and demographic engineering by the Sri Lankan state
and its partners. The cumulative record of citizenship denial, linguistic and
educational marginalization, state violence, genocide, ethnic cleansing, and
the erasure of culture and homeland meets the highest standards of
international concern.
While international institutions have profound structural
limitations, the Tamil people, their advocates, and their diaspora possess an
increasingly sophisticated set of tools to document, advocate, and demand
justice. The path forward lies in relentless, coordinated legal and policy
advocacy: shadow reporting, rigorous documentation, and the strategic assertion
of the right to self-determination under international law. The formation of
unified Tamil legal mechanisms and clinics offers the best prospect for
ensuring Tamil voices shape the legal and moral frame through which these
urgent questions are finally resolved.
Numbered References
1. Ponnambalam, G. G. (1939).
"50-50 Speech."
2. "Sinhala Only Act." (n.d.).
3. "Sri Lankan militarisation
continues in the Tamil homeland." (2024).
4. "Escalating land grabs threaten
Tamils and Muslims in Sri Lanka." (2024).
5. "Stubborn Push for Siege of
Hindu Temples in North-East Sri Lanka." (2024).
6. "Decades of betrayal: Fate of
Indian Tamils of Sri Lanka." (2024).
7. "Tamil Genocide." (n.d.).
8. "UNHRC urged to intervene as Sri
Lankan Tamils face continued oppression and injustice." (2024).
9. "Sri Lanka: Shadow report."
(2024).
10. "History of Sri Lanka:
Independent Ceylon (1948-71)." (n.d.).
11. "Sri Lanka Independence Day: A
legacy of colonialism and ethnic divides." (2024).
12. Ponnambalam, G. G. "50-50
Speech." (1939).
13. "G. G. Ponnambalam."
(n.d.).
14. "Sri Lankan militarisation
continues in the Tamil homeland." (2024).
15. "Sri Lankan Army still has vast
presence in North-East." (2024).
16. "Escalating land grabs threaten
Tamils and Muslims in Sri Lanka." (2024).
17. "Supreme Court stops land grab
from war-affected Tamils." (2025).
18. "Hindu temple in Anuradhapura
destroyed for bus stop." (2025).
19. "List of Hindu temples destroyed
in Sri Lanka during colonial rule." (n.d.).
20. "State-sponsored Sinhalese colonization."
(n.d.).
21. "Sinhalization of the
North-East." (2023).
22. "Sinhala Only Act." (n.d.).
23. "Sinhala Only Bill."
(n.d.).
24. de Alwis, S. (2022).
"Standardisation and ethnocracy in Sri Lanka."
25. "Policy of
standardisation." (n.d.).
26. "Ceylon Citizenship Act."
(n.d.).
27. "Decades of betrayal: Fate of
Indian Tamils of Sri Lanka." (2024).
28. "UN extends evidence-gathering
mandate for Sri Lanka war crimes." (2025).
29. "War crimes during the final
stages of the Sri Lankan Civil War." (n.d.).
30. "Tamil Genocide." (n.d.).
31. "Karaitivu 1985: The forgotten
anti-Tamil pogrom." (2022).
32. "Sri Lanka’s atrocities against
Tamils in 2009 constitute genocide." (2022).
33. "UNHRC urged to intervene as Sri
Lankan Tamils face continued oppression and injustice." (2024).
34. "ITJP torture report -
2024." (2024).
35. "Tamil Genocide." (n.d.).
36. "Expulsion of Muslims from
Northern Province of Sri Lanka." (n.d.).
37. "Sinhalese settlements and
forced evictions of Tamils in the North-East Province." (n.d.).
38. "UNHRC urged to intervene as Sri
Lankan Tamils face continued oppression and injustice." (2024).
39. "World Report 2025: Sri
Lanka." (2025).
40. "Sri Lanka: Shadow report."
(2024).
41. "UNHRC urged to intervene as Sri
Lankan Tamils face continued oppression and injustice." (2024).
42. "Universal Declaration of Human
Rights: Tamil translation." (n.d.).
43. "Tamil Rights Group."
(n.d.).
44. "Tamil Rights Group."
(n.d.).
45. "NCCT Canada: About."
(n.d.).
46. "In-text citations: The basics
(APA style)." (n.d.).
47. "Monitoring Human Rights:
Chapter 13." (n.d.).
References
29
History
of Sri Lanka - Independent Ceylon (1948–71) | Britannica
Sri
Lanka Independence Day: A Legacy of Colonialism and Ethnic Divides
Ilankai
Tamil Sangam
G.
G. Ponnambalam - Wikipedia
Ceylon
Citizenship Act - Wikipedia
Sinhala
Only Act - Wikipedia
Sinhala
Only Bill | Sinhala Language, Official Language, 1956 ...
Standardization
and ethnocracy in Sri Lanka - UNU-WIDER
Policy
of standardisation - Wikipedia
Sri
Lankan militarisation continues in the Tamil homeland
Sri
Lankan Army Still Has Vast Presence In North & East
World
Report 2025: Sri Lanka | Human Rights Watch
Escalating
Land Grabs Threaten Tamils & Muslims in Sri Lanka
Supreme
Court stops land grab from war-affected Tamils
State-sponsored
Sinhalese colonisation - Wikipedia
Sinhalization
of the North-East – Ilankai Tamil Sangam
Hindu
temple in Anuradhapura destroyed for bus stop
List
of Hindu temples destroyed in Sri Lanka during colonial rule
Sinhalese
Settlements and Forced Evictions of Tamils in the North-East ...
UN
Extends Evidence-Gathering Mandate for Sri Lanka War Crimes
War
crimes during the final stages of the Sri Lankan civil war
Tamil
genocide - Wikipedia
PEARL:
Sri Lanka’s Atrocities Against Tamils in 2009 Constitute ...
Karaitivu
1985: A Forgotten Anti-Tamil pogrom in the Shadow of Sri ...
DISAPPEARANCE,
TORTURE AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE OF TAMILS
UNHRC
Urged to Intervene as Sri Lankan Tamils Face Continued Oppression ...
CEDAW:
Sri Lanka Shadow Report – Sri Lanka Campaign
Tamil
Rights Group - International Advocacy Group - Markham, Canada
OHCHR
| Universal Declaration of Human Rights - Tamil
This work is incredible, highlighting the themes related to the genocide in Sri Lanka. For the UN, the term 'G word' is much more political and aligns with geopolitical interests. More academic writing is now needed to mainstream the Sri Lankan genocide than ever before.
ReplyDelete