Editor's Note

Purpose: This report aims to map key developments in U.S. foreign policy toward Sri Lanka and to contextualize the Tamil political and human rights struggle as of October 15, 2025.
Scope: The report focuses on diplomatic, security, economic, and human rights dimensions relevant to U.S.–Sri Lanka relations and Tamil advocacy, prioritizing clarity for policymakers, researchers, and civil society actors.
Tone and Balance: Analysis strives for factual accuracy and balanced framing while centring the lived experiences and documented claims of affected communities. The report foregrounds evidence where available and flags gaps or contested claims.
Acknowledgements: Contributions include primary documents, secondary literature, expert interviews, and submissions from civil society. The author thanks all contributors and coalition partners for their insights and support.
Contact: Editorial correspondence and requests for clarification or source materials should be directed to the author listed in the cover.

In solidarity,

Wimal Navaratnam

Human Rights Advocate | ABC Tamil Oli (ECOSOC)

Email: tamilolicanada@gmail.com

Methodology

Research Design

A mixed-methods approach combining qualitative document analysis, stakeholder interviews, and comparative policy review was used to generate this report. Priority was given to primary source material, including official statements, treaty body reports, diplomatic communications, NGO documentation, and verified eyewitness accounts.

Source Selection and Verification

Primary sources: Official U.S. government statements, Sri Lankan government releases, UN and treaty-body documents, and court or tribunal records where accessible.
Secondary sources: Peer-reviewed scholarship, reputable think-tank analyses, investigative journalism, and civil society briefs.
Verification steps: Cross-referenced claims across at least two independent sources when possible; rated source reliability; flagged single-source claims as provisional.

Interviews and Stakeholder Input

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with diplomats, legal experts, human rights researchers, and representatives from affected communities. Interviewees were offered anonymity where safety or reprisals were a concern. The report synthesises interview insights without exposing vulnerable individuals.

Analytical Framework

Analysis integrated:

Geopolitical analysis of U.S. strategic interests in the Indo-Pacific and multilateral forums;
Human rights framework grounded in international humanitarian law and treaty obligations;
Transitional justice lens examining accountability, reparations, and institutional reforms;
Advocacy impact assessment tracing how policy signals and assistance affect on-the-ground protections and political space for minority communities.

Limitations

Data availability varies by topic and timeframe; access to classified or confidential diplomatic materials was not possible; rapid geopolitical shifts may alter policy positions after publication. Where evidence is limited or contested, the report marks findings as tentative and recommends targeted follow-up research.

Ethics and Risk Management

Research protocols prioritized do-no-harm principles, informed consent for interview participants, secure handling of sensitive material, and redaction where disclosure posed safety risks. Advocacy outputs were reviewed to avoid unintentionally endangering individuals or groups.

U.S. Foreign Policy Toward Sri Lanka in 2025: Strategic, Diplomatic, and Human Rights Dimensions with Reference to the Tamil Struggle

Introduction

The U.S.-Sri Lanka relationship, forged over 75 years, has entered a period of renewed complexity and visibility in 2025. This follows Sri Lanka’s historic 2024 elections-the rise of President Anura Kumara Dissanayake and the National People’s Power (NPP) coalition-amid intensifying Indo-Pacific competition, a fragile post-crisis recovery, and persistent ethnic tensions, notably surrounding Sri Lanka’s Tamil community. This report provides an in-depth analysis of the strategic, diplomatic, economic, and human rights components of contemporary U.S. policy toward Sri Lanka, with a focus on U.S. engagement regarding longstanding Tamil grievances over human rights, reconciliation, and political representation. The analysis integrates official statements, recent aid developments, defense cooperation, congressional actions, and major U.S.-Tamil diaspora lobbying, as well as closely examining the U.S. response to Sri Lanka’s evolving approach to postwar accountability and minority inclusion as of October 2025.

1. U.S. Strategic Policy Objectives Toward Sri Lanka (2025)

1.1. Geopolitical Priorities and Non-Alignment

The United States consistently recognizes Sri Lanka’s strategic location at the crossroads of the Indian Ocean-vital for global trade, energy security, and multinational maritime operations. U.S. Indo-Pacific Command (INDOPACOM) leaders and diplomatic envoys regularly describe Sri Lanka as an “essential partner” and a regional “connector,” emphasizing the mutual desirability of an open, rules-based maritime domain and the prevention of any single power’s dominance ¹.

U.S. policy is designed to maintain balance: supporting Sri Lanka’s sovereignty and prosperity while encouraging its partnerships with India and counterbalancing China’s expanding influence (notably through infrastructure such as the Hambantota Port and Colombo Port City)². The U.S. does not seek exclusive allegiance; rather, it prefers a Sri Lanka capable of resisting great-power coercion, contributing to disaster response, and upholding regional stability.

1.2. Economic Recovery, Governance, and Reform

Another objective is to support Sri Lanka’s economic recovery and encourage reforms that foster market openness, transparency, and robust governance. This is shaped by lessons from Sri Lanka’s 2022 economic crisis, where fragile external finances, debt distress, and mismanagement upended livelihoods and democratic institutions.

The United States supports the IMF-backed agenda for fiscal discipline, anti-corruption, and investment climate improvements. U.S. commercial interests are also promoted, pressing for a fair playing field for U.S. investors and traders amid regulatory unpredictability and competition from Chinese and Indian state-backed firms³.

1.3. Democracy, Rule of Law, and Human Rights

Finally, the U.S. prioritizes the promotion and protection of democracy, the rule of law, and respect for human rights. This includes sustained calls for independent institutions, protection of freedom of expression and association, and-critically-accountability for war-era abuses and minority rights, especially in the North and East⁴.

2. U.S. Diplomatic Engagements and Official Statements (2024-2025)

2.1. High-Level Dialogues and Partnership Frameworks

Diplomatic dialogue peaked with the Fifth U.S.-Sri Lanka Partnership Dialogue in Washington, July 2024, reaffirming mutual commitments to economic prosperity, development, security cooperation, and human rights⁴. The U.S. delegation, led by senior State Department officials, lauded Sri Lanka’s recent macroeconomic stabilization and its IMF program, while reiterating support for governance and anti-corruption reforms.

Bilateral engagement has centered on:

· Debt restructuring and transparency initiatives

· Private sector investment promotion (especially through the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation, DFC)

· Climate cooperation, notably through renewable energy and environmental assistance programs

· Maritime security and defense cooperation, with the fourth U.S. Coast Guard high-endurance cutter and a King Air aircraft transferred in 2025

· Ongoing technical and grant assistance in agriculture, disaster resilience, and educational exchanges

Sri Lankan officials, in turn, have expressed appreciation for this support but also insisted on a “non-aligned” foreign policy, balancing relationships with the U.S., India, China, and others without exclusive partnerships⁵.

2.2. U.S. Embassy Statements and Soft Power

Ambassador Julie Chung, perhaps the most prominent U.S. official in Colombo, regularly highlights the depth of people-to-people ties, continued U.S. security and economic support, and the U.S. commitment to Sri Lanka’s sovereignty and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific⁶. Her speeches at civic events, educational initiatives, and major holidays underscore themes of democracy, economic partnership, and shared prosperity.

3. U.S. Defense and Security Cooperation with Sri Lanka

3.1. Pacific Angel and Multinational Exercises

The most conspicuous defense engagement of 2025 has been Exercise Pacific Angel 25, hosted by Sri Lanka in September. This was the largest such multilateral exercise in the country’s history, involving U.S. Pacific Forces, the Royal Australian Air Force, Japan, Maldives, Bangladesh, and the Sri Lanka military⁷⁸.

Activities included:

· Disaster response and humanitarian assistance (HA/DR)

· Search-and-rescue, mass casualty management, aeromedical evacuation, and jungle survival

· Maritime and aviation operations, with interoperability training among the region’s air forces and navies

· Subject matter expert exchanges to build technical skills and resilience

U.S. officials, including Ambassador Chung and defense attachés, stressed both the operational gains (“readiness,” “shared security”) and the partnership aspect, using these collaborations to reinforce Sri Lanka’s role in Indo-Pacific security architectures⁷.

3.2. Maritime Domain Awareness and Security Equipment

In addition to exercises, the U.S. continued to provide material support for Sri Lankan maritime domain awareness, including the transfer of naval vessels and maritime surveillance aircraft. These assets bolster Sri Lanka’s ability to combat trafficking, terrorism, piracy, and to respond to humanitarian crises, potentially reducing its dependence on Indian or Chinese military aid⁴.

3.3. Defense Dialogue and Humanitarian Assistance

The broader security relationship includes cooperation on humanitarian demining, cyber security, and port security, as well as U.S. support for Sri Lankan participation in regional security fora such as the Indian Ocean Rim Association (IORA) and the Colombo Security Conclave⁴.

4. U.S. Economic Aid and Financial Assistance (2024-2025)

4.1. Bilateral Assistance: Fluctuation and Freeze

U.S. development and humanitarian aid to Sri Lanka has been substantial since the 1950s, but the landscape has changed dramatically in 2025. The first half of the year saw the U.S. complete previous multi-year USAID-funded projects-focusing on governance, food security, economic growth, and civil society-including a $24.5 million grant announced in August 2024⁹¹⁰.

However, the return of President Trump to office in January 2025 triggered a broad freeze and partial rollback of aid appropriations, particularly those delivered via USAID. Congressional analyses and NGO surveys confirm that most Sri Lanka-directed USAID funding has been halted or drastically cut, with uncertain prospects for resumption¹¹.

Impacted areas include:

· Social Cohesion and Reconciliation (SCORE) and civil society empowerment, especially in Tamil-dominated areas

· Media development and democracy support, including initiatives for independent journalism and digital literacy

· Programs focused on gender inclusion and advocacy for marginalized groups

Some limited assistance-especially in macroeconomic stabilization, HIV/AIDS, and certain disaster-related interventions-survived, but the overall retrenchment has affected hundreds of thousands of direct beneficiaries and severely constrained local organizations previously reliant on U.S. support¹¹.

4.2. Ongoing and Recent Grant Programs

Aid disbursements in 2023-2024 reached record levels, with U.S. government data showing $115.7 million committed in FY2023, $117.9 million in FY2024, but only $11.5 million planned for FY2025 as of October⁹. The largest share of aid was for economic and humanitarian purposes-peace and security, health, democratic governance, disaster readiness, and reconciliation efforts.

Notable sectoral breakdowns:

· $32.5 million for school meals under the McGovern-Dole Food for Education Program, expanded to cover 200,000 students

· Direct support for the nutrition sector, conflict mitigation and reconciliation, economic development, and macroeconomic growth

· Peace Corps and educational exchange resumption, including English teaching and mutual research logistics

Despite the funding reductions, the Department of State’s Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor (DRL) issued a Notice of Funding Opportunity in December 2024 to strengthen civil society advocacy in the North and East, aiming to enhance resilience and representation for marginalized communities in the face of ongoing exclusion and unemployment¹².

4.3. American Development Finance and Private Sector Promotion

The U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) remains active, with over $300 million in commitments to Sri Lankan banks and, more recently, a $553 million stake in the West Container Terminal at Colombo Port-the most significant U.S.-backed infrastructure investment in Sri Lanka to date. These efforts signal ongoing U.S. intent to counter the sway of China’s Belt and Road Initiative and promote American commercial interests as drivers of recovery and reform⁴.

5. U.S.-Sri Lanka Trade and Investment Framework Agreement (TIFA) and Tariff Policy

The U.S.-Sri Lanka Trade and Investment Framework Agreement (TIFA) is the cornerstone of bilateral economic engagement. The 14th TIFA Council Meeting, held in Colombo in September 2023 after a four-year pause, focused on trade facilitation, labor law reform, intellectual property, digital economy, and sectoral investment opportunities, aiming to deepen ties in technology, renewable energy, apparel, agribusiness, and logistics¹³¹⁴. Apparel remains pivotal: the U.S. is Sri Lanka’s single largest export market, with $3.3 billion worth of exports in 2022.

However, the U.S. introduced an Executive Order in April 2025 imposing a 44% reciprocal tariff on all Sri Lankan exports, part of a broader recalibration of U.S. trade policy toward developing markets. The government of Sri Lanka responded by launching high-level diplomacy to negotiate relief, forming committees to assess sectoral impact, and accelerating diversification efforts (notably toward the EU, UK, and Asia-Pacific markets). The increased tariff regime has hit value-added sectors, raising urgency for Sri Lanka to modernize customs, improve competitiveness, and seek preferential access-including possible special trade preferences to support postwar reconciliation in conflict-affected areas¹⁵.

6. U.S. Human Rights Reporting and Accountability: Focus on Tamil Issues

6.1. Human Rights Monitoring, UNHRC Resolutions, and Evidence Gathering

The United States has consistently supported international scrutiny of Sri Lanka’s human rights record, both through Congress and in the UN system. It has backed (and often served as core sponsor of) successive resolutions at the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) calling for truth, reconciliation, and accountability for violations committed during the civil war, particularly crimes affecting the Tamil population⁴.

In October 2025, the UNHRC adopted a new resolution-over Sri Lankan objections-that reaffirms the mandate of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) to collect, analyze, and preserve evidence of serious abuses. The U.S. and co-sponsors argue that such external scrutiny remains essential due to Sri Lanka’s persistent record of broken promises and limited progress in domestic investigations. The OHCHR’s “Sri Lanka Accountability Project” now runs through 2027, with international actors encouraged to maintain pressure for further progress¹⁶¹⁷¹⁸.

6.2. U.S. Visa Sanctions and Restrictions for Rights Abuses

A major tool in U.S. policy is the imposition of travel bans and asset freezes on Sri Lankan officials allegedly responsible for gross human rights abuses, especially during the war’s final phase-often described as the “Mullivaikkal genocide” by Tamil actors¹⁹²⁰. Since 2020, specialized (Section 7031(c)) sanctions have targeted senior military officials, including:

· Shavendra Silva (Army Commander, accused of extrajudicial killing and attacks on Tamil civilians)

· Sunil Ratnayake and Chandana Prasad Hettiarachchi (extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances)

· Prabath Bulathwatte and Wasantha Karannagoda (torture, abductions)

· Senior officials implicated in corruption (Udayanga Weeratunga and Kapila Chandrasena)

These measures are largely symbolic-as they do not block trade or official military assistance to the Sri Lankan state-but they serve as signals of U.S. priorities and as rallying points for Tamil advocacy groups. Notably, the new Sri Lankan administration has welcomed U.S. anti-corruption sanctions while publicly opposing war crimes-related designations, signaling an ongoing reluctance to address past abuses domestically²⁰.

6.3. U.S. Congressional Resolutions for Tamil Self-Determination

U.S. Congress continues to play a dynamic role in advocacy for Tamil rights. On May 15, 2024, Congressman Wiley Nickel introduced House Resolution 1230, recognizing the genocide against the Tamil people and supporting a political solution based on their right to self-determination, including a possible independence referendum for Eelam Tamils²¹²². Over 50 Tamil diaspora organizations, spanning 15 countries, endorsed this resolution.

While the resolution has moderate, not bipartisan, support, its introduction is intensely symbolic and highlights the enduring frustration of the Tamil diaspora over the lack of progress in Sri Lanka and the widely perceived “double standards” of Western policy. The resolution urges direct diplomatic engagement with Tamil representatives, international monitoring of human rights, and consideration of a “permanent political solution” through a democratic referendum-a maximalist position not mirrored in executive branch or State Department policy, but increasingly reflected in diaspora lobbying efforts.

6.4. Engagement with the U.S.-Tamil Diaspora and Advocacy Groups

U.S.-based Tamil advocacy is highly organized, maintaining consistent congressional outreach, public awareness campaigns, and coordination with other ethnic lobbies and international human rights organizations²³. These organizations call for:

· Full U.S. recognition of the genocide against the Tamil people

· Support for war crimes prosecution at the International Criminal Court

· U.S. pressure for political devolution or independence via referendum in the Tamil homeland

· Scrutiny of Sri Lanka’s funding and security sector engagement to prevent impunity and forced assimilation

Their work-often in partnership with Congressional caucuses and human rights NGOs-keeps the Sri Lankan Tamil question alive in U.S. policymaking, particularly at moments of executive branch caution or retrenchment.

6.5. U.S. Funding for Tamil Reconciliation and Civil Society

Traditionally, U.S. funds supported programs aimed at social cohesion, good governance, and economic recovery in the North and East-reconciliation measures promoted as alternatives to militarization, language exclusion, and economic marginalization. With the 2025 USAID aid freeze, future programs are uncertain. However, the DRL is pursuing new competitive grants to support civil society resilience and advocacy in Northern and Eastern provinces, aiming to maintain pressure for accountability and support local minority voices ¹².

7. U.S. Responses to Sri Lankan Domestic Reconciliation: Progress and Obstacles

7.1. Government Promises versus Implementation

The Dissanayake government, elected in late 2024, inherited a complex legacy: widespread calls for de-militarization, repeal of the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA), credible war crimes investigations, and genuine power-sharing for Tamils and Muslims from both international actors and domestic minority groups¹⁶.

Sri Lanka has taken some positive steps, including anti-corruption legislation, return of limited government-held lands in the North and East, expanded investment in social protection, and the promise of broad-based reconciliation plans. The President’s coalition, however, remains ambivalent about addressing the core Tamil grievances-decades of language exclusion, the absence of Tamil officials in administration and courts, delays in provincial council elections, and the continued impunity for war-era crimes. Official statements and policy documents from the National Peace Council and major Tamil organizations stress continued underrepresentation, unresolved land disputes, and a development deficit in the East and North.

7.2. U.S. Position on Domestic Mechanisms and International Scrutiny

The U.S. continues to encourage “credible domestic mechanisms” for accountability in Sri Lanka, but increasingly expresses skepticism about their prospects in light of repeated failures and lack of genuine political will¹⁶¹⁸. The U.S. supports the ongoing OHCHR evidence-gathering project and retention of international oversight while pressing Sri Lanka to implement reforms, among them, the repeal of the PTA, the establishment of independent prosecutorial authorities, protection of language and religious rights, and full inclusion of Tamil and other minorities in governance and economic life.

Sri Lanka, for its part, expresses a preference for “non-intrusive,” domestic-driven reconciliation: officials categorically reject any attempt to “superimpose” external accountability mechanisms, arguing that real progress requires local ownership and context sensitivity¹⁷¹⁸.

7.3. Critiques by Human Rights Groups and Activists

Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and the UN Human Rights High Commissioner echo the critique that Sri Lanka’s proposed Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) lacks credibility and inclusiveness, failing to consult victims’ groups and civil society and replicating past failed initiatives. Evidence points to ongoing surveillance, intimidation, and underinvestment in Tamil-majority areas. Arbitrary arrest under the PTA, enforced disappearances, custodial killings, and obstacles to memorialization persist, with little accountability²⁴¹⁶.

8. Humanitarian and Disaster Response: U.S.-Sri Lanka Cooperation

Despite aid cuts in other areas, humanitarian and disaster preparedness remains a bright spot in the U.S.-Sri Lanka relationship. Not only in the form of the Pacific Angel exercise, which enhanced Sri Lanka’s search-and-rescue, mass casualty management, and military medical infrastructure, but also in the American role following past disasters, including the 2019 Easter Sunday terrorist attacks and the 2022 economic crisis⁷.

After the 2022 crisis, the United States provided extensive food aid, worked with the IMF on social protection floors, and supplied direct nutrition program grants; however, these interventions are less directly targeted at ethnic minority communities, leaving the responsibility of inclusive benefit increasingly to domestic authorities.

9. Impact of Sri Lanka’s Political Shift under President Dissanayake on U.S. Policy

The NPP’s accession to power in late 2024-a left-leaning coalition long critical of Western dominance and past Indian intervention-prompted unease and recalibration in U.S. and allied capitals⁵. Dissanayake’s rhetoric, while softening toward both New Delhi and Beijing, emphasizes “non-alignment,” policy sovereignty, and a middle path between India and China. His administration remains committed to the IMF program and has pursued economic reforms but is cautious in responding to Western (and especially U.S.) pressure for Tamil rights and power-sharing⁵.

For the U.S., the priority is to maintain an open door for commercial and security cooperation with the new government, while not lowering standards on human rights, minority inclusion, and anti-corruption. The U.S. has stepped up “track two” dialogues with business and think tank leaders, as evidenced by the large U.S. delegations visiting Colombo in 2025, hoping to encourage transparency, privatization, and continued openness to Western investment even as leftist elements in the government criticize market-led development³.

The uncertain future of U.S. assistance-especially with the USAID shutdown and new tariffs-and the ongoing inability to advance a negotiated Tamil political solution, has introduced a new fragility to the relationship, though both sides profess confidence in “historic friendship,” people-to-people ties, and shared democratic values.

10. Summary Table: Key Recent U.S. Initiatives and Sri Lanka/Tamil Issue Relevance

U.S. Initiative / Action	Year(s)	Focus Area	Relevance to Sri Lanka	Impact on Tamil Issues
Fifth Partnership Dialogue & Joint Statement	2024	Economic aid, reform, security, rights	Backs IMF recovery and inclusion	Encourages reconciliation, human rights, land return in North/East
Exercise Pacific Angel 25	2025	Defense, disaster preparedness	Large-scale multilateral exercise, skills transfer	Indirect, as disaster prep includes all communities, but not targeted at Tamil grievances
USAID/DRL Civil Society Resilience Grant	2024-25	Human rights, civil society	$1m for advocacy, representation in North/East	Enables Tamil NGOs to engage for rights/representation
U.S. Congressional Resolution 1230	2024	Political self-determination	Congressional symbolic support for Tamil referendum, accountability	Major diaspora/Tamil morale boost, puts pressure on administration, but not binding
U.S. Human Rights-based Visa Sanctions	2020-24	Accountability, corruption	Visa bans/certifications for military/political figures	Recognition of war crimes/abuses against Tamils, raises international profile
Reciprocal 44% Tariff on Sri Lankan Exports	2025	Trade	Hurts apparel/agri sectors, lobbies for reforms	Supports trade-driven reconciliation advocates, but negative economic side effect for all communities including Tamils
DFC West Container Terminal Investment	2024-25	Infrastructure, trade	Counters Chinese investment, supports Colombo Port modernization	No direct Tamil component; indirect by boosting whole-economy jobs and revenue
Support for UNHRC Evidence-Gathering/OHCHR Mandate	2024-25	Accountability, international law	Backs international pressure for war crimes inquiry	Sustains external scrutiny for justice for Tamil civilian victims

Each item is explained further in the sections above, but collectively they illustrate the dual track of U.S. engagement-combining broad-based aid and commercial partnership with targeted human rights measures and ongoing, if constrained, support for Tamil grievances.

Analysis and Commentary: Persistent Dilemmas, Emerging Constraints

Despite decades of U.S. engagement, Sri Lanka remains a case study in the tension between strategic, economic, and human rights imperatives for U.S. foreign policy. In 2025, Washington’s balancing act is sharpened by:

· The resurgence of strategic competition in the Indian Ocean, the imperative to counterbalance China, and the need to maintain access to trade routes and security partners

· The shock of the USAID freeze, highlighting the volatility of U.S. development assistance as an instrument of influence, and shifting the focus to "hard" security cooperation and symbolic-but less impactful-sanctions

· The persistent challenge of advancing transitional justice, equality for Tamils and Muslims, and credible reconciliation when both Sri Lankan majoritarian politics and the rise of left-nationalism constrain progress

· A U.S. Congress that sometimes takes bolder, more maximalist positions on self-determination and war crimes than is pursued by the administration, reflecting the sustained pressure from diaspora lobbying but limited ability to turn resolutions into policy

For the Tamil struggle, this situation is deeply fraught. Most U.S. benchmarks for progress-demilitarization, accountability, inclusive development, language rights, and return of land-have been only partially fulfilled, even when featured in partnership agreements or UN resolutions. The new Dissanayake government’s leftward shift and rhetorical commitment to equality have brought hope among some Tamil groups, but civil society, UN agencies, and diaspora organizations remain skeptical due to slow progress, ongoing state surveillance in Tamil-majority regions, and an unwillingness to tackle legacy abuses¹⁸.

Recent years have, however, demonstrated the ability of U.S. mechanisms-bilateral dialogue, international resolutions, grant funding, and, especially, symbolic sanctions and diaspora activism-to keep Sri Lanka under global scrutiny, protect civic space, and embolden local voices for accountability. The efficacy of these measures, particularly in the absence of robust economic and security leverage, remains uncertain. Increasingly, Washington risks losing soft-power influence-paving the way for greater Chinese or regional (Indian) dominance, or emboldening domestic forces resistant to reform.

In summary: U.S. foreign policy toward Sri Lanka in 2025 is characterized by a pragmatic calibration of strategic stability, market openness, and the persistent-if sometimes frustrated-promotion of human rights and pluralism. The Tamil struggle is central to U.S. human rights discourse, less so to current aid or investment priorities, and increasingly at the frontline of congressional and diaspora advocacy. The future of the relationship, and of justice for Sri Lanka’s minorities, will depend on the Dissanayake government’s willingness to act on bold promises, U.S. readiness to sustain multilateral and local partnerships, and the resilience of civil society on the island.

Conclusion

The U.S.-Sri Lanka relationship in 2025 exemplifies both enduring partnership and persistent contestation over the meaning of sovereignty, justice, and pluralism in an era of intensified regional rivalry. Amid fluctuating aid, strategic cooperation, robust diaspora advocacy, and the partial recalibration of Sri Lankan domestic politics, U.S. policy maintains a multi-layered toolkit: strategic dialogue, defense engagement, sanctions, and support for human rights and minority inclusion-even as its leverage is increasingly contested.

For Sri Lanka’s Tamils, U.S. action and rhetoric remain a crucial, if ambivalent, lifeline in the ongoing pursuit of justice, equal citizenship, and genuine power-sharing. Whether those aspirations are realized will depend not only on Washington’s stance, but also on local agency-in Colombo and in Jaffna-and the unpredictable tides of South Asian and global politics. The coming years will test whether the promise of partnership can survive, or indeed catalyze, a true reconciliation with the past and a shared vision for the future.

Disclaimer

This document is produced for research, education, and public awareness purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, an official position of any government or organisation, or a call to action on behalf of any group. All interpretations, analysis, and conclusions are based on available sources and subject to change as new information emerges. Readers are encouraged to verify facts independently and consult qualified legal or policy experts before taking action. The author, contributors, and publishers accept no liability for decisions made or actions taken based on this document.

References (36)

1. Securing the Indo-Pacific Together: U.S., Sri Lanka, and Like-minded .... https://lk.usembassy.gov/securing-the-indo-pacific-together-u-s-sri-lanka-and-like-minded-partners/

15. Strategic pathways for Sri Lanka - navigating US reciprocal tariff .... https://www.ft.lk/columns/Strategic-pathways-for-Sri-Lanka-navigating-US-reciprocal-tariff-regime-Part-2/4-775189

16. Sri Lanka has opportunity to break from past - Türk . https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2025/08/sri-lanka-has-opportunity-break-past-turk

14. United States and Sri Lanka strengthen bilateral Trade and Investment .... https://island.lk/united-states-and-sri-lanka-strengthen-bilateral-trade-and-investment-relations-at-14th-tifa-council-meeting/

17. Sri Lanka rejects resolution at the UN Human Rights Council. https://mfa.gov.lk/en/sl-rejects-resolution-unhrc/

18. Foreign Minister’s Statement in Parliament on UNHRC Resolution on Sri .... https://www.news.lk/current-affairs/foreign-ministers-statement-in-parliament-on-unhrc-resolution-on-sri-lanka

20. The curious case of the US Sri Lanka sanctions - Lowy Institute. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/curious-case-us-sri-lanka-sanctions

21. Over 50 Tamil Diaspora organizations endorse US congress resolution. https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/over-50-tamil-diaspora-organizations-endorse-us-congress-resolution

22. Joint Statement by US and Diaspora Tamil Organizations in Support of .... https://www.einpresswire.com/article/724801249/joint-statement-by-us-and-diaspora-tamil-organizations-in-support-of-house-resolution-1230

13. US-SRI LANKA TRADE AND INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK COUNCIL ADOPTS ACTION PLAN .... https://mfa.gov.lk/en/tifa/

19. US imposes sanctions on two more SL military officers. https://www.dailymirror.lk/Breaking-News/US-imposes-sanctions-on-two-more-SL-military-officers/108-226649

23. US Tamil Organizations Jointly Call for Independence Referendum for .... https://fgto.org/news/press-releases/us-tamil-organizations-jointly-call-for-independence-referendum-for-eelam-tamils-to-resolve-the-dispute-in-sri-lanka/

2. Sri Lanka - Indian Ocean Security and the US Indo-Pacific Strategy. https://www.eastwestcenter.org/sites/default/files/2024-10/APB%20704%20-%20Sri%20Lanka%20-%20%20Indian%20Ocean%20Security%20and%20the%20US%20Indo-Pacific%20Strategy.pdf

3. BOI, US delegation discuss strategic partnerships - Newswire. https://www.newswire.lk/2025/10/12/boi-us-delegation-discuss-strategic-partnerships/

4. Joint Statement from the Fifth Session of the United States-Sri Lanka .... https://lk.usembassy.gov/joint-statement-from-the-fifth-session-of-the-united-states-sri-lanka-partnership-dialogue/

5. Negotiating left politics in Sri Lanka: The NPP in government. https://greenagenda.org.au/2025/01/negotiating-left-politics-in-sri-lanka-the-npp-victory/

10. Joint Statement from the Fifth Session of the United States-Sri Lanka .... https://2021-2025.state.gov/joint-statement-from-the-fifth-session-of-the-united-states-sri-lanka-partnership-dialogue/

12. DRL FY24 Supporting Civil Society Advocacy and Resilience in Sri Lanka. https://2021-2025.state.gov/drl-fy24-supporting-civil-society-advocacy-and-resilience-in-sri-lanka/

6. US Envoy hails enduring partnership with Sri Lanka at 249th .... https://www.ft.lk/business/US-Envoy-hails-enduring-partnership-with-Sri-Lanka-at-249th-Independence-Day-address/34-778424

7. United States and Sri Lanka Launch Multilateral PACIFIC ANGEL (Pac .... https://lk.usembassy.gov/united-states-and-sri-lanka-launch-multilateral-pacific-angel-pac-angel-25-exercise-to-enhance-disaster-response/

8. Lanka to host multilateral Pacific Angel exercise - The Island. https://island.lk/lanka-to-host-multilateral-pacific-angel-exercise/

9. How much foreign aid does the US provide to - USAFacts. https://usafacts.org/answers/how-much-foreign-aid-does-the-us-provide/countries/sri-lanka/

11. The USAID Freeze: A View From Sri Lanka and the Global South. https://thediplomat.com/2025/04/the-usaid-freeze-a-view-from-sri-lanka-and-the-global-south/

24. Sri Lanka’s Flawed Plans for a ‘Truth Commission’. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/asa37/7165/2023/en/

AMIDST GEOPOLITICS: USA'S STANCE ON SRI LANKA AND THE TAMIL STRUGGLE IN 2025