The Calculus of Complicity: Analyzing Sri Lanka's Relaxed Restrictions on Maaveerar Naal and the Imperative for Sustained International Justice Advocacy

The Calculus of Complicity:

Analyzing Sri Lanka's Relaxed Restrictions on Maaveerar Naal and the Imperative for Sustained International Justice Advocacy

Editor's Note

This report has been prepared by an independent researcher and is intended as an advocacy and strategic guidance document for Eelam Tamil political parties, civil society organizations in Sri Lanka's Northern and Eastern provinces, and international diaspora advocacy groups. Its objective is to critically examine recent changes in the Sri Lankan government's policy towards the commemoration of Maaveerar Naal (Great Heroes' Day), and to propose a cohesive, disciplined, and strengthened strategy for advancing accountability and self-determination at the international level.

Disclaimer

This advocacy report is based on publicly available documentation, expert analysis, and mandated inputs. It reflects a critical legal and political interpretation of events surrounding the Tamil national struggle. While adherence to the suggested recommendations—particularly those related to non-violence and organizational discipline—is strongly advised to maximize the efficacy of international engagement and minimize security risks, this report does not constitute legal counsel or a guarantee of personal safety in areas subject to pervasive surveillance and restrictive legislation in Sri Lanka.

Abstract

This report critically examines the Sri Lankan government's recent relaxation of restrictions surrounding the commemoration of Maaveerar Naal (Great Heroes’ Day), a key event in the Tamil national struggle. It examines how memorialization practices serve as indicators of transitional justice, with a focus on the rights to assembly, association, and remembrance for Sri Lankan Tamils. Drawing on publicly available documentation and expert analysis, the report highlights the ongoing tension between cultural mourning and state securitization and offers strategic guidance for Eelam Tamil political parties, civil society, and diaspora organizations. The recommendations emphasize non-violent advocacy and disciplined international engagement to advance accountability and self-determination, while noting the continued risks posed by surveillance and restrictive legislation in Sri Lanka.


I. Introduction: The Right to Memorialization as a Barometer for Transitional Justice

1.1. Contextualizing Maaveerar Naal (MvN) within the National Struggle

Maaveerar Naal (MvN), or Great Heroes’ Day, is observed annually on November 27th.1 This date commemorates the death in combat of the first Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) cadre, Lieutenant Shankar (Sathiyanathan alias Suresh), in 1982.1. The event was formally institutionalized on November 27, 1989, by LTTE leader V. Prabhakaran, establishing a “cult of martyrdom” central to the organization’s identity and subsequent diaspora mobilization.1

The tradition involves specific, ritualized ceremonies, including the lighting of oil lamps for three days ending on November 27th, and the raising of the Tamil Eelam flag.1 The official symbol for the observance is the Gloriosa superba flower, which naturally blooms during November.1

From a legal and transitional justice perspective, the ability of Sri Lankan Tamils to observe MvN is fundamentally an exercise of the protected rights to freedom of assembly, freedom of association, and the inherent right to mourn and remember kin lost during the conflict. This right to memory serves as a crucial barometer for measuring genuine progress in reconciliation and the fulfillment of transitional justice commitments. However, the SLG consistently frames MvN not as a cultural day of mourning but as an exclusively LTTE-centric political ritual designed to glorify armed militancy and sustain the quest for separatism.3 This classification allows the state to legally justify suppression under counter-terrorism laws.4

1.2. Scope and Methodology

This report employs a critical geopolitical and legal analysis, utilizing qualitative data derived from human rights reports, judicial rulings, and official statements from international financial institutions (IFIs).

The core analytical framework involves a geopolitical triangulation study. This study systematically compares the observed shifts in the SLG's policy regarding the memorialization of MvN (specifically the contrast between aggressive suppression in 2023 and reported minimal interference in 2024/2025) with the procedural cycles of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) Extended Fund Facility (EFF) reviews 5 and the SLG’s non-compliance with human rights obligations stemming from the UN Universal Periodic Review (UPR) and UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) resolutions.7 This analysis seeks to determine if the measured relaxation of restrictions is a true gesture of goodwill or a strategic maneuver driven by external financial and diplomatic pressure to secure funding and evade international accountability.

All evidence and major claims within this report are supported by APA Style inline citations, referencing the provided documentation.1

II. The Contested Landscape of Memory: State Suppression and Resilience

2.1. The Symbolic and Physical Significance of the Thuyilum Illam

Central to the memory culture of MvN are the Thuyilum Illams, or resting places, which serve as cemeteries for fallen LTTE cadres.9 These sites transcend mere burial grounds; the LTTE’s burial process was known as vithaiththal (planting of a seed), symbolizing that the deceased were not gone but had taken root as seeds for future generations to rise.9 This architecturalization of martyrdom was intended to reinforce the continuity of the national struggle.

Following the end of the conflict in May 2009, the Sri Lankan state engaged in a systematic effort to erase this physical architecture of Tamil national memory. All 35 LTTE resting places were razed and bulldozed.9 This destruction was often followed by the military occupation of the site. The starkest example of this structural repression is the Koppay Thuyilum Illam in Jaffna, which housed at least 2,000 fallen cadres. After being bulldozed in 2010, the land was seized, and the Sri Lankan military’s 51 Division base was constructed directly on top of the cemetery.9 This action is a definitive demonstration of state symbolic dominance and the structural refusal to permit the right to memory.

2.2. Documentation of State Repression vs. Calculated Relaxation (2023–2025)

The governmental approach to MvN has historically been characterized by outright prohibition, enforced through security forces and judicial mandates.

In 2023, state repression was overtly aggressive. Incidents documented include the demolition of memorial structures at Tharavai Thuyilum Illam in Batticaloa.11 The police obtained court orders prohibiting events dedicated to the commemoration of dead LTTE cadres, and roadblocks were deployed to obstruct access to cemeteries.11 Notably, surveillance intensified around the MvN event, resulting in arrests and disruption, including the detention of nine Tamils under the draconian Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA). .12

A demonstrable shift occurred by late 2024 and extending into 2025, when reports indicated that large-scale commemorations and protests, including MvN events and so-called Tamil Genocide Remembrance Day, occurred with “minimal interference” from the authorities.12

However, this apparent relaxation is not consistent across all forms of memorialization. While the state permitted high-visibility gatherings, it continued to prosecute specific, symbolic acts linked directly to wartime atrocity allegations. For example, in May 2024, magistrates issued orders preventing the distribution of Mullivaikkal Kanji (rice gruel), asserting that this act of remembrance amounted to the commemoration of LTTE cadres and posed a risk to public health and safety.13 The subsequent arrests of individuals engaged in distributing Kanji demonstrate that the government maintains its capacity and willingness to suppress specific acts of memory, even as it tolerates larger assemblies.

This tactical change in enforcement illustrates a dual strategy of visibility management deployed by the Sri Lankan state. By allowing the high-visibility, large-scale MvN ceremonies to proceed with minimal interference, the SLG aims to satisfy external demands for civic space and freedom of assembly, projecting the political stability necessary for ongoing financial confidence and investment. Simultaneously, by maintaining the occupation of critical memorial sites 9 and prosecuting low-visibility but potent symbolic acts (Kanji) 13, the SLG reinforces its core commitment to control the narrative and ensures that the structural instruments of repression—such as the PTA and military surveillance—remain absolute.12 The objective is to secure geopolitical compliance while maintaining domestic control over the historical narrative and security architecture.

2.3. List of Thuyilum Illam in the North and East

The Thuyilum Illams listed below represent sites of significant community memory and political contention, many of which have been destroyed or are subject to ongoing military presence and community restoration efforts.

Table 1: Confirmed Thuyilum Illam (Resting Places) in the North and East

District

Name of Thuyilum Illam

Status / Significance (Post-2009)

Source Reference

Jaffna

Koppay

Bulldozed; occupied by Sri Lankan military 51 Division base (since 2010)

9

Kilinochchi

Kanagapuram

Site of major recent community restoration efforts and large gatherings

10

Kilinochchi

Mulankavil

Site of recent community clearing and commemoration

10

Mullaitivu

Visuvamadu

Destroyed by Sri Lankan Army; site of recent commemorations

9

Mullaitivu

Alambil

Listed Maveerar Thuyilum Illam

10

Mannar

Pandivirichchan

Partially restored by community efforts despite ongoing military surveillance

10

Vavuniya

Echchankulam

Listed Maveerar Thuyilum Illam

10

Trincomalee

Aalankulam (Sampur)

Site of recent clearing and decoration efforts

14

Batticaloa

Mavadi Munmari

Site of recent clearing and decoration efforts

14

Manal Aru

Punithapoomi, Uthapeedam

Historically prominent sites for early commemorations

10

Final Conflict Area

Suthanthirapuram, Iranaippalai, Mullivaikkal East/West

Sites located near the conflict's final phase

10

III. The Calculus of Compliance: Geopolitical Triggers for Relaxation

The core question facing the Eelam Tamil-speaking people is whether the relaxation of restrictions on MvN memorialization a true gesture from the SL government or is a strategic necessity dictated by external geopolitical constraints. Analysis confirms the latter: the shift is primarily driven by the need for financial stability and avoidance of international justice mechanisms.

3.1. IMF Conditionalities and the Governance Imperative

The economic stability of Sri Lanka is fundamentally dependent on the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The US$3 billion IMF Extended Fund Facility (EFF) was approved after Sri Lanka defaulted on its foreign debt in 2022 and was instrumental in stemming the immediate economic crisis.17 The continued disbursement of funds, which are released after periodic reviews, is vital for the country's recovery.5

A key pillar of the IMF program is strengthening governance and reducing corruption vulnerabilities.19 Reports from Human Rights Watch (HRW) and other international bodies have consistently argued that Sri Lanka’s economic crisis is inextricably linked to fundamental misgovernance and chronic impunity for atrocity crimes and corruption.8 Therefore, to secure continued financial support, the SLG must project an image of improving political stability and adherence to the rule of law.

The calculated non-interference in large-scale MvN commemorations in late 2024 and 2025 is a direct response to this financial necessity. Overt, globally visible repression, such as the arrests under the PTA documented in 2023 12, triggers immediate negative attention from international partners and may jeopardize IMF governance scores and the subsequent financial tranches.17 By tolerating scheduled, high-visibility MvN assemblies, the SLG executes a political cost-benefit analysis: the cost of permitting memorialization is significantly lower than the cost of jeopardizing the multi-billion dollar IMF package and new financing from institutions like the World Bank.21 The allowance of MvN, therefore, serves as a superficial demonstration of domestic human rights tolerance, essential for satisfying the geopolitical compliance requirements imposed by IFIs.

3.2. UN UPR, International Justice, and Whitewashing

Beyond the financial incentives, the SLG's relaxation is strongly influenced by ongoing international accountability mechanisms. Sri Lanka faces sustained pressure through the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) and the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) process, which urges the state to protect human rights defenders and civil society and advance transitional justice.7 The inability to make substantive progress on accountability since 2015, despite commitments to establish a judicial mechanism to prosecute perpetrators of atrocity crimes, remains a significant failure.8

The temporary easing of restrictions on memorialization is designed to pre-empt stronger international action. Tamil political parties and civil society continue to advocate for the UN to refer Sri Lanka to the International Criminal Court (ICC) and to expand the mandate of the UN’s Sri Lanka Accountability Project (OSLAP).24 By permitting MvN, the government seeks to diffuse this pressure, arguing to the international community that domestic conditions for civic expression are improving, thereby attempting to negate the need for international justice intervention.

This strategy is unequivocally a form of whitewashing accountability for past international crimes committed against Tamils. The SLG has taken minimal steps to investigate and punish officials credibly accused of human rights abuses.26 Despite the political change following the 2024 elections, Tamils continue to face persistent discrimination, heavy military surveillance, and the ongoing use of repressive legislation.12 The gesture is untrustworthy because it fundamentally fails to address the lack of justice for alleged war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide that characterize the end phase of the conflict.23 The tactical allowance of mourning rituals is a superficial trade-off, purchased at a minimal political cost to ensure the maximum benefit of continued impunity and global financial stabilization.

Table 2: State Response to Tamil Memorialization (2023-2025): Conflict vs. Compliance Analysis

Dimension

2023 Enforcement Posture

2024-2025 Enforcement Posture

Strategic Interpretation

Underlying Legal Structure

Aggressive use of PTA and judicial prohibitions. 11

PTA remains in force; new repressive laws proposed; proscription lists maintained.17

Structural impunity remains despite cosmetic changes.

Geopolitical Driver

Domestic Ethno-nationalist Security/Political Mandate.

Geopolitical Compliance (IMF/UPR) to secure financial stability and avoid ICC referral. 19

Compliance is conditional, reversible, and non-genuine.

Accountability for Crimes

Zero progress on transitional justice commitments.8

Continued denial of accountability for past international crimes.23 Minimal punishment of abusive officials.26

Whitewash Strategy: Use human rights optics to cover impunity for atrocity crimes.

IV. The Imperative for Unchanged Advocacy: Seeking International Justice

The analysis confirms that the SLG’s relaxation of restrictions is a strategic and reversible maneuver, not an unchangeable concession based on a genuine commitment to human rights or reconciliation. Therefore, Tamils must continue to expedite and enhance their advocacy at the international stage in seeking international justice.

4.1. Escalating Demands for High-Level Accountability

Given the state's deep-seated rejection of accountability, as demonstrated by the lack of progress on post-war transitional justice 8, the necessity of external mechanisms remains paramount. Advocacy efforts must be directed toward forcing binding international intervention.

1.     ICC Referral: Political advocacy must maintain the demand for the United Nations to refer Sri Lanka to the International Criminal Court (ICC), given the gravity and scale of the alleged atrocity crimes.24

2.     Strengthening OSLAP: Demands must focus on extending the mandate of the UN's Sri Lanka Accountability Project (OSLAP) and expanding its investigative capacity. 25 Crucially, the mandate should be coupled with an explicit message urging referral to the ICC, thus ensuring that OSLAP’s documentation contributes directly to a pathway for international prosecution.24

3.     Universal Jurisdiction (UJ): Continued focus on supporting universal jurisdiction cases outside Sri Lanka is essential. This strategy leverages the domestic laws of third-party states to prosecute alleged perpetrators, effectively shrinking the safe havens available to officials credibly accused of international crimes.24

4.2. Leveraging Diaspora and Political Momentum on the Global Stage

Global advocacy has gained tangible momentum, exemplified by US Congressional resolutions introduced in 2023 and 2024. These resolutions, supported by dozens of Tamil diaspora organizations, clearly advocate for addressing justice grievances and promoting the long-term goal of self-determination, including an internationally monitored independence referendum for Eelam Tamils. 29

The SLG recognizes the political efficacy of this external advocacy, evidenced by its decision in 2024 to renew the prohibition of several major Tamil diaspora political organizations. 28 People affiliated with or perceived to support these proscribed groups, such as the Transnational Government of Tamil Eelam (TGTE), remain subject to surveillance.12 International pressure, particularly from the UK and US, must be exerted to challenge and lift these politically motivated bans, which obstruct legitimate engagement and human rights advocacy.

A critical element of future advocacy must be the strategic alignment of the justice agenda with the international community's concerns regarding governance and financial stability. By continuously arguing that sustainable economic recovery (as sought by the IMF) cannot be achieved without dismantling the structural impunity that fueled corruption and conflict 21, the Tamil advocacy movement can link the pursuit of accountability for war crimes directly to the geopolitical interests of major world powers.

V. Operational and Organizational Strategy: Recommendations for Eelam Tamils

To capitalize on the limited civic space currently afforded and to maximize the effectiveness of international advocacy, local organizers and the Tamil community in the North and East must strictly adhere to principles of discipline, unity, and non-violence.

5.1. Upholding Foundational Discipline and Non-Violent Principles

Maintain Non-Violence and Strict Protocol. Tamils and the organizers in the North and East must strictly maintain the discipline and structure as outlined by the founders of Maaveerar Naal. This foundational discipline must be anchored in non-violence at all times.

This commitment to non-violence is not merely a moral imperative but a critical legal strategy. When MvN events are conducted with disciplined non-violence, they transform the event from a perceived "terrorist" threat (justifying state suppression under the PTA) into a legally protected exercise of cultural memory and the right to assemble under international human rights law.

Strategic De-Militarization. Furthermore, organizers must avoid politicizing the event or structures at all times. This means rigorously avoiding the display of any logos, uniforms, or images associated with the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), as the SL Minister of Public Security has confirmed these remain prohibited under anti-terrorism laws.3 By denying the government any pretext of glorifying militancy through symbolism, organizers restrict the SLG’s legal grounds for intervention, thereby preserving the hard-won, albeit fragile, civic space for commemoration.

5.2. Collaborative Management and Preservation of Thuyilum Illam

Unified Stewardship and Maintenance. Effective stewardship of the memorial sites is essential to counteract the state’s deliberate policy of erasure. All Thuyilum Illam must work in coordination and fully collaboratively (No divided policies). This unified approach ensures a consistent defence against land grabs, legal challenges, and military intimidation, maximizing the collective security and ownership of these contested spaces.

It is imperative to maintain all the Thuyilum Illam in the North and Eastern, ensuring they are neat at all times. As evidenced by community efforts in Pandivirichchan and Kanagapuram, continuous, visible maintenance and clearing, sometimes including the planting of symbolic trees 14, constitute a powerful, non-violent assertion of civilian ownership. This persistent civil action directly challenges the state’s narrative of military dominance and perpetual occupation of these sensitive sites.9

5.3. Inclusive Memorialization: Recognizing All Fighters

Expanding the Narrative of Sacrifice. A critical recommendation for strengthening the legitimacy of the struggle involves embracing pluralism in remembrance. Organizers must recognize the brothers and sisters from the Muslim Maaveerar and Sinhala Maaveerar who fought along and their community and families.

Historically, the LTTE committed violent acts, including massacres and ethnic cleansing, against both Muslim and Sinhalese communities.3 However, records confirm the presence of individuals from Muslim and, presumably, Sinhala backgrounds who fought alongside the movement, including Muslim cadres such as Naseem, Latheep, and Captain Farooq. 31

The strategic value of inclusive memorialization is twofold:

1.     Moral Authority: It proactively addresses historical criticisms concerning the LTTE’s exclusionary practices and reinforces the moral legitimacy of the struggle as a multi-ethnic quest for justice and liberation against systemic state oppression.

2.     Solidarity Building: By honouring all who died fighting against state violence, regardless of their ethnic background, the Tamil political movement signals a long-term commitment to a pluralistic political future. This reframing fosters broader political solidarity within the North and East and enhances the movement’s acceptance among international human rights organizations concerned with minority rights and future political governance. 32

VI. Conclusion: Vigilance and Unwavering Commitment

The SL government’s relaxation of restrictions on the memorialization of Maaveerar Naal is a fragile diplomatic fiction. It is a calculated and reversible political concession, driven not by genuine commitment to human rights or reconciliation, but by the critical need for economic stabilization linked to IMF compliance and a strategic effort to forestall stronger UN accountability mechanisms, such as ICC referral. This action is ultimately designed to whitewash a deeply entrenched culture of impunity for atrocity crimes.

The enduring structural threat—maintained through the military occupation of sites like Koppay, pervasive surveillance, and the retention of draconian laws like the PTA—mandates extreme caution and vigilance. The strategic imperative for the Eelam Tamil-speaking people remains clear: maintain rigorous non-violent discipline and organizational unity in the homeland while relentlessly intensifying advocacy for international justice. Only mechanisms external to Sri Lanka, such as referral to the ICC, expansion of OSLAP, and the utilization of universal jurisdiction, possess the mandate and capacity to dismantle the systemic impunity that continues to define the Sri Lankan state. The pursuit of truth, memory, and accountability must not yield to the temporary illusion of minimal interference.

VII. Appendix: Confirmed Thuyilum Illam in the North and East

District

Name of Thuyilum Illam

Source Reference

Jaffna

Koppay

9

Kilinochchi

Kanagapuram

10

Kilinochchi

Mulankavil

10

Mullaitivu

Visuvamadu

9

Mullaitivu

Alambil

10

Mullaitivu

Suthanthirapuram (Final Battle Area)

10

Mullaitivu

Dharmapuram (Final Battle Area)

10

Mullaitivu

Iranaippalai (Final Battle Area)

10

Mullaitivu

Pachaippulveli (Final Battle Area)

10

Mullaitivu

Mullivaikkal East (Final Battle Area)

10

Mullaitivu

Mullivaikkal West (Final Battle Area)

10

Mannar

Pandivirichchan

10

Mannar

Mullikkulam

10

Vavuniya

Echchankulam

10

Trincomalee

Aalankulam (Sampur)

14

Batticaloa

Mavadi Munmari

14

Manal Aru

Punithapoomi

10

Manal Aru

Uthapeedam

10

Vadamarachchi East

Uduthurai

10

Thenmarachchi

Kodikamam

10

Vadamarachchi

Ellangulam

10

Theevakam

Saaddi

10

 

VIII. References and Sources

Adayaalam Centre for Policy Research. (2024, May 14). Joint civil society: Persisting denial of the right to truth, memory and memorialization. Joint Civil Society. 13 https://adayaalam.org/joint-civil-society-persisting-denial-of-the-right-to-truth-memory-and-memorialisation-joint-civil-society/

Amnesty International. (n.d.). Sri Lanka: Report 2024. 27 https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/asia-and-the-pacific/south-asia/sri-lanka/report-sri-lanka/

Amnesty International. (1992, June). Sri Lanka: Time for bold action. 30 https://www.amnesty.org/es/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/asa370101992en.pdf

Carnegie Endowment. (2025, August). Sri Lanka: Aragalaya protest movement oust Wickremesinghe Rajapaksa. 32 https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2025/08/sri-lanka-aragalaya-protest-movement-oust-wickremesinghe-rajapaksa?lang=en

Concerned Historians. (2024, November). Maaveerar Naal is a day of remembrance for Sri Lankan Tamil families in the north and east of the country. 11 https://www.concernedhistorians.org/content_files/file/le/816.pdf

DBS Jeyaraj. (n.d.). The Birth and Growth of the "Maaveerar Naal" (Great Heroes Day) Event. 2 https://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/?p=83174

East Asia Forum. (2024, October 30). US Congress backs diaspora-driven efforts for Tamil self-determination. 29 https://eastasiaforum.org/2024/10/30/us-congress-backs-diaspora-driven-efforts-for-tamil-self-determination/

Global R2P. (n.d.). Recommendations for the 42nd session of the Universal Periodic Review: Sri Lanka. 7 https://www.globalr2p.org/publications/recommendations-for-the-42nd-session-of-the-universal-periodic-review/

HRW. (2023, March 29). Sri Lanka: IMF loan risks eroding rights. 21 https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/03/29/sri-lanka-imf-loan-risks-eroding-rights

HRW. (2024). World Report 2024: Sri Lanka. 17 https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2024/country-chapters/sri-lanka

HRW. (2024, March 12). Sri Lanka: Repression of civic space threatens financial reform. 22 https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/03/12/sri-lanka-repression-civic-space-threatens-financial-reform

IMF. (2024, November 27). Transcript of press briefing: Sri Lanka. 33 https://www.imf.org/en/news/articles/2024/11/27/tr112724-transcript-of-press-briefing-sri-lanka

IMF. (2025). Sri Lanka: Third review under the extended arrangement under the extended fund facility. 6 https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/2025/162/article-A000-en.xml

IMF. (2025). Staff-Level Agreement on the Fifth Review under the EFF Arrangement. 5 https://www.imf.org/en/news/articles/2025/10/09/pr25335-sri-lanka-imf-staff-reaches-sla-on-fifth-review-under-eff-arrangement

IMF. (2025, June 16). This time must be different: Lessons from Sri Lanka's recovery and debt restructuring. 18 https://www.imf.org/en/news/articles/2025/06/16/sp061625-gg-this-time-must-be-different-lessons-from-sri-lankas-recovery-and-debt-restructuring

IMF. (2025). The authorities reiterated their intention to accelerate the pace of reforms. 20 https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/2025/162/article-A001-en.xml

IMF. (2025). The program supports Sri Lanka's efforts to durably restore macroeconomic stability. 19 https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/2025/162/article-A000-en.xml

Lanka Web. (2025, November 24). Maaveerar Naal, LTTE commemoration and the politics of selective memory. 3 https://www.lankaweb.com/news/items/2025/11/24/maaveerar-naal-ltte-commemoration-and-the-politics-of-selective-memory/

PEARL. (2024, November). Maaveerar Naal Statement 2024. 34 https://pearlaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Maaveerar-Naal-Statement-2024.pdf

Queens Law Global Justice. (n.d.). Introduction: Navigating the complex terrain of accountability in Sri Lanka. 23 https://globaljustice.queenslaw.ca/news/special-issue-accountability-in-sri-lanka

Sri Lanka Campaign. (2025, May 18). Mullivaikkal Remembrance Day 2025: Memory, mourning and the long struggle for justice. 25 https://srilankacampaign.org/mullivaikkal-remembrance-day-2025-memory-mourning-and-the-long-struggle-for-justice/

Tamil Eelam Library. (n.d.). Thuyilum Illam. 10 https://telibrary.com/en/thuyilum-illam/

Tamil Guardian. (n.d.). Explainer: What is a Thuyilum Illam. 9 https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/explainer-what-thuyilum-illam

Tamil Guardian. (n.d.). Final preparations for Maaveerar Naal at thuyilum illams across the Tamil homeland. 14 https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/final-preparations-maaveerar-naal-thuyilum-illams-across-tamil-homeland

Tamil Guardian. (n.d.). Maaveerar Naal commemorated across Kilinochchi. 15 https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/maaveerar-naal-commemorated-across-kilinochchi

Tamil Guardian. (n.d.). Muslim Maaveerar in the Tamil struggle. 31 https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/muslim-maaveerar-tamil-struggle-3

Tamil Guardian. (n.d.). Preparations begin in Mannar for Maaveerar Day commemoration. 16 https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/preparations-begin-mannar-maaveerar-day-commemoration

Tamil Guardian. (n.d.). Sri Lanka continues ban on Tamil organisations despite government change. 28 https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/sri-lanka-continues-ban-tamil-organisations-despite-government-change

Tamil Guardian. (n.d.). Sri Lanka will not allow photographs of fallen cadres for Maaveerar Naal. 4 https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/sri-lanka-will-not-allow-photographs-fallen-cadres-maaveerar-naal

Tamil Guardian. (n.d.). Tamil political parties and civil society urge UN to refer Sri Lanka to ICC. 24 https://tamilguardian.com/content/tamil-political-parties-and-civil-society-urge-un-refer-sri-lanka-icc

UPR Info. (2023, March). Joint Civil Society Submission on Sri Lanka. 8 https://upr-info.org/sites/default/files/country-document/2023-03/JS9_UPR42_LKA_E_Main.pdf

US Department of State. (n.d.). 2023 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Sri Lanka. 35 https://www.state.gov/reports/2023-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/sri-lanka/

US Department of State. (n.d.). 2024 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Sri Lanka. 26 https://www.state.gov/reports/2024-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/sri-lanka

UK Government. (2025, August). Country Policy and Information Note: Tamil separatism, Sri Lanka. 12 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/sri-lanka-country-policy-and-information-notes/country-policy-and-information-note-tamil-separatism-sri-lanka-august-2025-accessible

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Maaveerar Naal. 1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maaveerar_Naal

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Sri Lankan Civil War. 36 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sri_Lankan_civil_war

Wikipedia. (n.d.). COVID-19 pandemic. 37 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic

Works cited

Maaveerar Naal - Wikipedia, accessed November 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maaveerar_Naal

The Birth and Growth of the “Maaveerar Naal” (Great Heroes Day) Event. - dbsjeyaraj.com, accessed November 26, 2025, https://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/?p=83174

Maaveerar Naal, LTTE Commemoration, and the Politics of Selective Memory - LankaWeb, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.lankaweb.com/news/items/2025/11/24/maaveerar-naal-ltte-commemoration-and-the-politics-of-selective-memory/

Sri Lanka will not allow photographs of fallen cadres on Maaveerar Naal | Tamil Guardian, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/sri-lanka-will-not-allow-photographs-fallen-cadres-maaveerar-naal

IMF Staff Reaches Staff-Level Agreement on the Fifth Review Under Sri Lanka's Extended Fund Facility Arrangement, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.imf.org/en/news/articles/2025/10/09/pr25335-sri-lanka-imf-staff-reaches-sla-on-fifth-review-under-eff-arrangement

Sri Lanka: Third Review Under the Extended Arrangement Under the Extended Fund Facility, Financing Assurances Review, and Monetary Policy Consultation Clause-Press Release; Staff Report; and Statement by the Executive Director for Sri Lanka, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.imf.org/en/publications/cr/issues/2025/03/03/sri-lanka-third-review-under-the-extended-arrangement-under-the-extended-fund-facility-562827

Recommendations for the 42nd Session of the Universal Periodic Review, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.globalr2p.org/publications/recommendations-for-the-42nd-session-of-the-universal-periodic-review/

Sri Lanka's Universal Periodic Review 4th Cycle January 2023 - UPR info, accessed November 26, 2025, https://upr-info.org/sites/default/files/country-document/2023-03/JS9_UPR42_LKA_E_Main.pdf

Explainer - what is a Thuyilum Illam? | Tamil Guardian, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/explainer-what-thuyilum-illam

Fallen freedom fighters and their uprising after the death – “Thuyilum Illam” - Tamil Heritage, accessed November 26, 2025, https://telibrary.com/en/thuyilum-illam/

7 February 2024 Excellency, We have the honour to address you in our capacities as Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, - Network of Concerned Historians, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.concernedhistorians.org/content_files/file/le/816.pdf

Country policy and information note: Tamil separatism, Sri Lanka, August 2025 (accessible), accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/sri-lanka-country-policy-and-information-notes/country-policy-and-information-note-tamil-separatism-sri-lanka-august-2025-accessible

Joint Civil Society – Persisting Denial of the Right to Truth, Memory and Memorialisation ... - Adayaalam Centre for Policy Research, accessed November 26, 2025, https://adayaalam.org/joint-civil-society-persisting-denial-of-the-right-to-truth-memory-and-memorialisation-joint-civil-society/

Final preparations for Maaveerar Naal at Thuyilum Illams across Tamil homeland, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/final-preparations-maaveerar-naal-thuyilum-illams-across-tamil-homeland

Maaveerar Naal commemorated across Kilinochchi | Tamil Guardian, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/maaveerar-naal-commemorated-across-kilinochchi

Families and former fighters begin Maaveerar Naal preparations in Mannar - Tamil Guardian, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/preparations-begin-mannar-maaveerar-day-commemoration

World Report 2024: Sri Lanka | Human Rights Watch, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2024/country-chapters/sri-lanka

This Time Must be Different: Lessons from Sri Lanka's Recovery and Debt Restructuring, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.imf.org/en/news/articles/2025/06/16/sp061625-gg-this-time-must-be-different-lessons-from-sri-lankas-recovery-and-debt-restructuring

Front Matter in: IMF Staff Country Reports Volume 2025 Issue 162 (2025), accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/2025/162/article-A000-en.xml

Sri Lanka: Fourth Review Under the Extended Arrangement Under the Extended Fund Facility, Requests for Waiver of Applicability of Performance Criteria, Modification of Performance Criteria, and Financing Assurances Review-Press Release; Staff Report; and Statement by the Executive Director for Sri Lanka in: IMF Staff Country Reports Volume 2025 Issue 162 (2025) - IMF eLibrary - International Monetary Fund, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/2025/162/article-A001-en.xml

Sri Lanka: IMF Loan Risks Eroding Rights - Human Rights Watch, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/03/29/sri-lanka-imf-loan-risks-eroding-rights

Sri Lanka: Repression of Civic Space Threatens Financial Reform - Human Rights Watch, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/03/12/sri-lanka-repression-civic-space-threatens-financial-reform

Special Issue: Navigating the Complex Terrain of Accountability in Sri Lanka, accessed November 26, 2025, https://globaljustice.queenslaw.ca/news/special-issue-accountability-in-sri-lanka

Tamil political parties and civil society urge UN to refer Sri Lanka to the ICC, accessed November 26, 2025, https://tamilguardian.com/content/tamil-political-parties-and-civil-society-urge-un-refer-sri-lanka-icc

Mullivaikkal Remembrance Day 2025: Memory, Mourning and the Long Struggle for Justice, accessed November 26, 2025, https://srilankacampaign.org/mullivaikkal-remembrance-day-2025-memory-mourning-and-the-long-struggle-for-justice/

2024 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Sri Lanka - U.S. Department of State, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.state.gov/reports/2024-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/sri-lanka

Human rights in Sri Lanka - Amnesty International, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/asia-and-the-pacific/south-asia/sri-lanka/report-sri-lanka/

Sri Lanka continues ban on Tamil organisations despite government change, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/sri-lanka-continues-ban-tamil-organisations-despite-government-change

US Congress backs diaspora-driven efforts for Tamil self-determination - East Asia Forum, accessed November 26, 2025, https://eastasiaforum.org/2024/10/30/us-congress-backs-diaspora-driven-efforts-for-tamil-self-determination/

£SRI LANKA @Deliberate killings of Muslim and Tamil villagers in Polonnaruwa - Amnesty International, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.amnesty.org/es/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/asa370101992en.pdf

Sinhala, Muslim and Burgher Maaveerar of the Tamil Eelam Struggle, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/muslim-maaveerar-tamil-struggle-3

The Aragalaya Protest Movement and the Struggle for Political Change in Sri Lanka, accessed November 26, 2025, https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2025/08/sri-lanka-aragalaya-protest-movement-oust-wickremesinghe-rajapaksa?lang=en

Transcript of Press Briefing: Sri Lanka, November 2024 - International Monetary Fund, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.imf.org/en/news/articles/2024/11/27/tr112724-transcript-of-press-briefing-sri-lanka

Maaveerar Naal Statement 2024 - People for Equality and Relief in Lanka, accessed November 26, 2025, https://pearlaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Maaveerar-Naal-Statement-2024.pdf

Sri Lanka - United States Department of State, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.state.gov/reports/2023-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/sri-lanka/

Sri Lankan civil war - Wikipedia, accessed November 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sri_Lankan_civil_war

COVID-19 pandemic - Wikipedia, accessed November 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic

Comments