The Calculus of Complicity: Analyzing Sri Lanka's Relaxed Restrictions on Maaveerar Naal and the Imperative for Sustained International Justice Advocacy
The Calculus of Complicity:
Analyzing Sri Lanka's Relaxed Restrictions on Maaveerar Naal and the Imperative for Sustained International Justice Advocacy
Editor's Note
This report has been prepared by
an independent researcher and is intended as an advocacy and strategic guidance
document for Eelam Tamil political parties, civil society organizations in Sri
Lanka's Northern and Eastern provinces, and international diaspora advocacy
groups. Its objective is to critically examine recent changes in the Sri Lankan
government's policy towards the commemoration of Maaveerar Naal (Great Heroes'
Day), and to propose a cohesive, disciplined, and strengthened strategy for
advancing accountability and self-determination at the international level.
Disclaimer
This advocacy report is based on publicly available
documentation, expert analysis, and mandated inputs. It reflects a critical
legal and political interpretation of events surrounding the Tamil national
struggle. While adherence to the suggested recommendations—particularly those
related to non-violence and organizational discipline—is strongly advised to
maximize the efficacy of international engagement and minimize security risks,
this report does not constitute legal counsel or a guarantee of personal safety
in areas subject to pervasive surveillance and restrictive legislation in Sri
Lanka.
Abstract
This report critically examines the
Sri Lankan government's recent relaxation of restrictions surrounding the
commemoration of Maaveerar Naal (Great Heroes’ Day), a key event in the Tamil
national struggle. It examines how memorialization practices serve as
indicators of transitional justice, with a focus on the rights to assembly,
association, and remembrance for Sri Lankan Tamils. Drawing on publicly
available documentation and expert analysis, the report highlights the ongoing
tension between cultural mourning and state securitization and offers strategic
guidance for Eelam Tamil political parties, civil society, and diaspora
organizations. The recommendations emphasize non-violent advocacy and
disciplined international engagement to advance accountability and
self-determination, while noting the continued risks posed by surveillance and
restrictive legislation in Sri Lanka.
I. Introduction: The Right to Memorialization as a Barometer for
Transitional Justice
1.1. Contextualizing Maaveerar Naal (MvN) within
the National Struggle
Maaveerar Naal (MvN), or Great Heroes’
Day, is observed annually on November 27th.1 This date commemorates
the death in combat of the first Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) cadre,
Lieutenant Shankar (Sathiyanathan alias Suresh), in 1982.1. The event was formally institutionalized on November 27, 1989,
by LTTE leader V. Prabhakaran, establishing a “cult of martyrdom” central to
the organization’s identity and subsequent diaspora mobilization.1
The tradition involves
specific, ritualized ceremonies, including the lighting of oil lamps for three
days ending on November 27th, and the raising of the Tamil Eelam flag.1 The official symbol for the observance is the Gloriosa
superba flower, which naturally blooms during November.1
From a legal and
transitional justice perspective, the ability of Sri Lankan Tamils to observe
MvN is fundamentally an exercise of the protected rights to freedom of
assembly, freedom of association, and the inherent right to mourn and remember kin
lost during the conflict. This right to memory serves as a crucial barometer
for measuring genuine progress in reconciliation and the fulfillment of
transitional justice commitments. However, the SLG consistently frames MvN not
as a cultural day of mourning but as an exclusively LTTE-centric political
ritual designed to glorify armed militancy and sustain the quest for
separatism.3 This classification
allows the state to legally justify suppression under counter-terrorism laws.4
1.2. Scope and Methodology
This report employs a
critical geopolitical and legal analysis, utilizing qualitative data derived
from human rights reports, judicial rulings, and official statements from
international financial institutions (IFIs).
The core analytical
framework involves a geopolitical triangulation study. This study
systematically compares the observed shifts in the SLG's policy regarding the
memorialization of MvN (specifically the contrast between aggressive
suppression in 2023 and reported minimal interference in 2024/2025) with the
procedural cycles of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) Extended Fund
Facility (EFF) reviews 5 and the SLG’s
non-compliance with human rights obligations stemming from the UN Universal
Periodic Review (UPR) and UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) resolutions.7 This analysis seeks to determine if the measured relaxation of
restrictions is a true gesture of goodwill or a strategic maneuver driven by
external financial and diplomatic pressure to secure funding and evade
international accountability.
All evidence and major
claims within this report are supported by APA Style inline citations,
referencing the provided documentation.1
II.
The Contested Landscape of Memory: State Suppression and Resilience
2.1. The Symbolic and Physical Significance of the
Thuyilum Illam
Central to the memory
culture of MvN are the Thuyilum Illams, or resting places, which serve
as cemeteries for fallen LTTE cadres.9 These sites transcend
mere burial grounds; the LTTE’s burial process was known as vithaiththal
(planting of a seed), symbolizing that the deceased were not gone but had taken
root as seeds for future generations to rise.9 This architecturalization of martyrdom was intended to
reinforce the continuity of the national struggle.
Following the end of the
conflict in May 2009, the Sri Lankan state engaged in a systematic effort to
erase this physical architecture of Tamil national memory. All 35 LTTE
resting places were razed and bulldozed.9 This destruction was
often followed by the military occupation of the site. The starkest example of
this structural repression is the Koppay Thuyilum Illam in Jaffna, which
housed at least 2,000 fallen cadres. After being bulldozed in 2010, the
land was seized, and the Sri Lankan military’s 51 Division base was
constructed directly on top of the cemetery.9 This action is a definitive demonstration of state symbolic
dominance and the structural refusal to permit the right to memory.
2.2. Documentation of State Repression vs.
Calculated Relaxation (2023–2025)
The governmental
approach to MvN has historically been characterized by outright prohibition,
enforced through security forces and judicial mandates.
In 2023, state
repression was overtly aggressive. Incidents documented include the demolition
of memorial structures at Tharavai Thuyilum Illam in Batticaloa.11 The police obtained court orders prohibiting events dedicated
to the commemoration of dead LTTE cadres, and roadblocks were deployed to
obstruct access to cemeteries.11 Notably, surveillance
intensified around the MvN event, resulting in arrests and disruption,
including the detention of nine Tamils under the draconian Prevention of
Terrorism Act (PTA). .12
A demonstrable shift
occurred by late 2024 and extending into 2025, when reports indicated that
large-scale commemorations and protests, including MvN events and so-called Tamil
Genocide Remembrance Day, occurred with “minimal interference” from the
authorities.12
However, this apparent
relaxation is not consistent across all forms of memorialization. While the
state permitted high-visibility gatherings, it continued to prosecute specific,
symbolic acts linked directly to wartime atrocity allegations. For example, in
May 2024, magistrates issued orders preventing the distribution of Mullivaikkal
Kanji (rice gruel), asserting that this act of remembrance amounted to the
commemoration of LTTE cadres and posed a risk to public health and safety.13 The subsequent arrests of individuals engaged in distributing Kanji
demonstrate that the government maintains its capacity and willingness to
suppress specific acts of memory, even as it tolerates larger assemblies.
This tactical change in
enforcement illustrates a dual strategy of visibility management deployed by
the Sri Lankan state. By allowing the high-visibility, large-scale MvN
ceremonies to proceed with minimal interference, the SLG aims to satisfy
external demands for civic space and freedom of assembly, projecting the
political stability necessary for ongoing financial confidence and investment.
Simultaneously, by maintaining the occupation of critical memorial sites
9 and prosecuting low-visibility but potent symbolic acts (Kanji)
13, the SLG reinforces its core commitment to control the
narrative and ensures that the structural instruments of repression—such as the
PTA and military surveillance—remain absolute.12 The objective is to secure geopolitical compliance while
maintaining domestic control over the historical narrative and security
architecture.
2.3. List of Thuyilum Illam in the North and East
The Thuyilum Illams
listed below represent sites of significant community memory and political
contention, many of which have been destroyed or are subject to ongoing
military presence and community restoration efforts.
Table 1: Confirmed
Thuyilum Illam (Resting Places) in the North and East
|
District |
Name of Thuyilum Illam |
Status / Significance
(Post-2009) |
Source Reference |
|
Jaffna |
Koppay |
Bulldozed; occupied by
Sri Lankan military 51 Division base (since 2010) |
9 |
|
Kilinochchi |
Kanagapuram |
Site of major recent
community restoration efforts and large gatherings |
10 |
|
Kilinochchi |
Mulankavil |
Site of recent
community clearing and commemoration |
10 |
|
Mullaitivu |
Visuvamadu |
Destroyed by Sri
Lankan Army; site of recent commemorations |
9 |
|
Mullaitivu |
Alambil |
Listed Maveerar
Thuyilum Illam |
10 |
|
Mannar |
Pandivirichchan |
Partially restored by
community efforts despite ongoing military surveillance |
10 |
|
Vavuniya |
Echchankulam |
Listed Maveerar
Thuyilum Illam |
10 |
|
Trincomalee |
Aalankulam (Sampur) |
Site of recent
clearing and decoration efforts |
14 |
|
Batticaloa |
Mavadi Munmari |
Site of recent
clearing and decoration efforts |
14 |
|
Manal Aru |
Punithapoomi,
Uthapeedam |
Historically prominent
sites for early commemorations |
10 |
|
Final Conflict Area |
Suthanthirapuram,
Iranaippalai, Mullivaikkal East/West |
Sites located near the
conflict's final phase |
10 |
III. The Calculus of Compliance: Geopolitical
Triggers for Relaxation
The core question facing the Eelam Tamil-speaking people is
whether the relaxation of restrictions on MvN memorialization a true gesture
from the SL government or is a strategic necessity dictated by external
geopolitical constraints. Analysis confirms the latter: the shift is primarily
driven by the need for financial stability and avoidance of international
justice mechanisms.
3.1.
IMF Conditionalities and the Governance Imperative
The economic stability of Sri Lanka is fundamentally
dependent on the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The US$3 billion IMF
Extended Fund Facility (EFF) was approved after Sri Lanka defaulted on its
foreign debt in 2022 and was instrumental in stemming the immediate economic
crisis.17 The continued disbursement of funds, which are released after
periodic reviews, is vital for the country's recovery.5
A key
pillar of the IMF program is strengthening governance and reducing corruption
vulnerabilities.19 Reports from Human
Rights Watch (HRW) and other international bodies have consistently argued that
Sri Lanka’s economic crisis is inextricably linked to fundamental misgovernance
and chronic impunity for atrocity crimes and corruption.8 Therefore, to secure continued financial support, the SLG must
project an image of improving political stability and adherence to the rule of
law.
The
calculated non-interference in large-scale MvN commemorations in late 2024 and
2025 is a direct response to this financial necessity. Overt, globally visible
repression, such as the arrests under the PTA documented in 2023 12, triggers immediate negative attention from international
partners and may jeopardize IMF governance scores and the subsequent financial
tranches.17 By tolerating scheduled, high-visibility MvN assemblies, the
SLG executes a political cost-benefit analysis: the cost of permitting memorialization
is significantly lower than the cost of jeopardizing the multi-billion dollar
IMF package and new financing from institutions like the World Bank.21 The allowance of MvN, therefore, serves as a superficial
demonstration of domestic human rights tolerance, essential for satisfying the
geopolitical compliance requirements imposed by IFIs.
3.2.
UN UPR, International Justice, and Whitewashing
Beyond
the financial incentives, the SLG's relaxation is strongly influenced by
ongoing international accountability mechanisms. Sri Lanka faces sustained
pressure through the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) and the Universal Periodic
Review (UPR) process, which urges the state to protect human rights defenders
and civil society and advance transitional justice.7
The inability to make substantive progress on accountability since 2015,
despite commitments to establish a judicial mechanism to prosecute perpetrators
of atrocity crimes, remains a significant failure.8
The
temporary easing of restrictions on memorialization is designed to pre-empt
stronger international action. Tamil political parties and civil society
continue to advocate for the UN to refer Sri Lanka to the International
Criminal Court (ICC) and to expand the mandate of the UN’s Sri Lanka
Accountability Project (OSLAP).24 By permitting MvN, the
government seeks to diffuse this pressure, arguing to the international
community that domestic conditions for civic expression are improving, thereby
attempting to negate the need for international justice intervention.
This
strategy is unequivocally a form of whitewashing accountability for past
international crimes committed against Tamils. The SLG has taken minimal steps
to investigate and punish officials credibly accused of human rights abuses.26
Despite the political change following the 2024 elections, Tamils continue to
face persistent discrimination, heavy military surveillance, and the ongoing
use of repressive legislation.12 The gesture is
untrustworthy because it fundamentally fails to address the lack of justice for
alleged war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide that characterize the
end phase of the conflict.23 The tactical allowance of
mourning rituals is a superficial trade-off, purchased at a minimal political
cost to ensure the maximum benefit of continued impunity and global financial
stabilization.
Table 2: State
Response to Tamil Memorialization (2023-2025): Conflict vs. Compliance Analysis
|
Dimension |
2023 Enforcement Posture |
2024-2025 Enforcement Posture |
Strategic Interpretation |
|
Underlying Legal Structure |
Aggressive use of PTA and judicial prohibitions. 11 |
PTA remains in force; new repressive laws proposed;
proscription lists maintained.17 |
Structural impunity remains despite
cosmetic changes. |
|
Geopolitical Driver |
Domestic Ethno-nationalist
Security/Political Mandate. |
Geopolitical Compliance (IMF/UPR) to secure financial
stability and avoid ICC referral. 19 |
Compliance is conditional, reversible, and
non-genuine. |
|
Accountability for Crimes |
Zero progress on transitional justice commitments.8 |
Continued denial of accountability for past international
crimes.23 Minimal punishment of abusive officials.26 |
Whitewash Strategy: Use human rights
optics to cover impunity for atrocity crimes. |
IV. The Imperative for Unchanged Advocacy: Seeking
International Justice
The
analysis confirms that the SLG’s relaxation of restrictions is a strategic and
reversible maneuver, not an unchangeable concession based on a genuine
commitment to human rights or reconciliation. Therefore, Tamils must continue
to expedite and enhance their advocacy at the international stage in seeking
international justice.
4.1.
Escalating Demands for High-Level Accountability
Given the state's
deep-seated rejection of accountability, as demonstrated by the lack of
progress on post-war transitional justice 8, the necessity of
external mechanisms remains paramount. Advocacy efforts must be directed toward
forcing binding international intervention.
1. ICC Referral: Political advocacy must
maintain the demand for the United Nations to refer Sri Lanka to the
International Criminal Court (ICC), given the gravity and scale of the alleged
atrocity crimes.24
2. Strengthening OSLAP: Demands must focus on
extending the mandate of the UN's Sri Lanka Accountability Project (OSLAP) and
expanding its investigative capacity. 25 Crucially, the mandate
should be coupled with an explicit message urging referral to the ICC, thus
ensuring that OSLAP’s documentation contributes directly to a pathway for
international prosecution.24
3.
Universal Jurisdiction (UJ): Continued focus on supporting universal
jurisdiction cases outside Sri Lanka is essential. This strategy leverages the
domestic laws of third-party states to prosecute alleged perpetrators,
effectively shrinking the safe havens available to officials credibly accused
of international crimes.24
4.2. Leveraging Diaspora and Political Momentum on the Global
Stage
Global
advocacy has gained tangible momentum, exemplified by US Congressional
resolutions introduced in 2023 and 2024. These resolutions, supported by dozens
of Tamil diaspora organizations, clearly advocate for addressing justice
grievances and promoting the long-term goal of self-determination, including an
internationally monitored independence referendum for Eelam Tamils. 29
The
SLG recognizes the political efficacy of this external advocacy, evidenced by
its decision in 2024 to renew the prohibition of several major Tamil diaspora
political organizations. 28 People affiliated with or
perceived to support these proscribed groups, such as the Transnational
Government of Tamil Eelam (TGTE), remain subject to surveillance.12
International pressure, particularly from the UK and US, must be exerted to
challenge and lift these politically motivated bans, which obstruct legitimate
engagement and human rights advocacy.
A
critical element of future advocacy must be the strategic alignment of the
justice agenda with the international community's concerns regarding governance
and financial stability. By continuously arguing that sustainable economic
recovery (as sought by the IMF) cannot be achieved without dismantling the
structural impunity that fueled corruption and conflict 21,
the Tamil advocacy movement can link the pursuit of accountability for war
crimes directly to the geopolitical interests of major world powers.
V. Operational and Organizational Strategy:
Recommendations for Eelam Tamils
To capitalize on the
limited civic space currently afforded and to maximize the effectiveness of
international advocacy, local organizers and the Tamil community in the North
and East must strictly adhere to principles of discipline, unity, and non-violence.
5.1.
Upholding Foundational Discipline and Non-Violent Principles
Maintain Non-Violence
and Strict Protocol. Tamils and the organizers in the North and East must strictly
maintain the discipline and structure as outlined by the founders of Maaveerar
Naal. This foundational discipline must be anchored in non-violence at all
times.
This commitment to
non-violence is not merely a moral imperative but a critical legal strategy.
When MvN events are conducted with disciplined non-violence, they transform the
event from a perceived "terrorist" threat (justifying state suppression
under the PTA) into a legally protected exercise of cultural memory and the
right to assemble under international human rights law.
Strategic
De-Militarization. Furthermore, organizers must avoid politicizing the event or
structures at all times. This means rigorously avoiding the display of any
logos, uniforms, or images associated with the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam
(LTTE), as the SL Minister of Public Security has confirmed these remain
prohibited under anti-terrorism laws.3 By denying the
government any pretext of glorifying militancy through symbolism, organizers
restrict the SLG’s legal grounds for intervention, thereby preserving the
hard-won, albeit fragile, civic space for commemoration.
5.2.
Collaborative Management and Preservation of Thuyilum Illam
Unified Stewardship and
Maintenance.
Effective stewardship of the memorial sites is essential to counteract the
state’s deliberate policy of erasure. All Thuyilum Illam must work in
coordination and fully collaboratively (No divided policies). This unified
approach ensures a consistent defence against land grabs, legal challenges, and
military intimidation, maximizing the collective security and ownership of
these contested spaces.
It is imperative to
maintain all the Thuyilum Illam in the North and Eastern, ensuring they
are neat at all times. As evidenced by community efforts in Pandivirichchan and
Kanagapuram, continuous, visible maintenance and clearing, sometimes including
the planting of symbolic trees 14, constitute a powerful,
non-violent assertion of civilian ownership. This persistent civil action
directly challenges the state’s narrative of military dominance and perpetual
occupation of these sensitive sites.9
5.3.
Inclusive Memorialization: Recognizing All Fighters
Expanding the Narrative
of Sacrifice. A
critical recommendation for strengthening the legitimacy of the struggle
involves embracing pluralism in remembrance. Organizers must recognize the
brothers and sisters from the Muslim Maaveerar and Sinhala Maaveerar
who fought along and their community and families.
Historically, the LTTE
committed violent acts, including massacres and ethnic cleansing, against both
Muslim and Sinhalese communities.3 However, records
confirm the presence of individuals from Muslim and, presumably, Sinhala
backgrounds who fought alongside the movement, including Muslim cadres such as
Naseem, Latheep, and Captain Farooq. 31
The strategic value of
inclusive memorialization is twofold:
1. Moral Authority: It proactively
addresses historical criticisms concerning the LTTE’s exclusionary practices
and reinforces the moral legitimacy of the struggle as a multi-ethnic quest for
justice and liberation against systemic state oppression.
2.
Solidarity Building: By honouring all who died fighting against state violence,
regardless of their ethnic background, the Tamil political movement signals a
long-term commitment to a pluralistic political future. This reframing fosters
broader political solidarity within the North and East and enhances the
movement’s acceptance among international human rights organizations concerned
with minority rights and future political governance. 32
VI. Conclusion: Vigilance and Unwavering Commitment
The SL government’s
relaxation of restrictions on the memorialization of Maaveerar Naal is a
fragile diplomatic fiction. It is a calculated and reversible political
concession, driven not by genuine commitment to human rights or reconciliation,
but by the critical need for economic stabilization linked to IMF compliance
and a strategic effort to forestall stronger UN accountability mechanisms, such
as ICC referral. This action is ultimately designed to whitewash a deeply
entrenched culture of impunity for atrocity crimes.
The
enduring structural threat—maintained through the military occupation of sites
like Koppay, pervasive surveillance, and the retention of draconian laws like
the PTA—mandates extreme caution and vigilance. The strategic imperative for
the Eelam Tamil-speaking people remains clear: maintain rigorous non-violent
discipline and organizational unity in the homeland while relentlessly
intensifying advocacy for international justice. Only mechanisms external to
Sri Lanka, such as referral to the ICC, expansion of OSLAP, and the utilization
of universal jurisdiction, possess the mandate and capacity to dismantle the
systemic impunity that continues to define the Sri Lankan state. The pursuit of
truth, memory, and accountability must not yield to the temporary illusion of
minimal interference.
VII. Appendix: Confirmed Thuyilum Illam in the
North and East
|
District |
Name of Thuyilum Illam |
Source Reference |
|
Jaffna |
Koppay |
9 |
|
Kilinochchi |
Kanagapuram |
10 |
|
Kilinochchi |
Mulankavil |
10 |
|
Mullaitivu |
Visuvamadu |
9 |
|
Mullaitivu |
Alambil |
10 |
|
Mullaitivu |
Suthanthirapuram
(Final Battle Area) |
10 |
|
Mullaitivu |
Dharmapuram (Final
Battle Area) |
10 |
|
Mullaitivu |
Iranaippalai (Final
Battle Area) |
10 |
|
Mullaitivu |
Pachaippulveli (Final
Battle Area) |
10 |
|
Mullaitivu |
Mullivaikkal East
(Final Battle Area) |
10 |
|
Mullaitivu |
Mullivaikkal West
(Final Battle Area) |
10 |
|
Mannar |
Pandivirichchan |
10 |
|
Mannar |
Mullikkulam |
10 |
|
Vavuniya |
Echchankulam |
10 |
|
Trincomalee |
Aalankulam (Sampur) |
14 |
|
Batticaloa |
Mavadi Munmari |
14 |
|
Manal Aru |
Punithapoomi |
10 |
|
Manal Aru |
Uthapeedam |
10 |
|
Vadamarachchi East |
Uduthurai |
10 |
|
Thenmarachchi |
Kodikamam |
10 |
|
Vadamarachchi |
Ellangulam |
10 |
|
Theevakam |
Saaddi |
10 |
VIII. References and Sources
Adayaalam Centre for
Policy Research. (2024, May 14). Joint civil society: Persisting denial of
the right to truth, memory and memorialization. Joint Civil Society. 13 https://adayaalam.org/joint-civil-society-persisting-denial-of-the-right-to-truth-memory-and-memorialisation-joint-civil-society/
Amnesty International.
(n.d.). Sri Lanka: Report 2024. 27
https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/asia-and-the-pacific/south-asia/sri-lanka/report-sri-lanka/
Amnesty International.
(1992, June). Sri Lanka: Time for bold action. 30 https://www.amnesty.org/es/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/asa370101992en.pdf
Carnegie Endowment. (2025,
August). Sri Lanka: Aragalaya protest movement oust Wickremesinghe Rajapaksa.
32 https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2025/08/sri-lanka-aragalaya-protest-movement-oust-wickremesinghe-rajapaksa?lang=en
Concerned Historians.
(2024, November). Maaveerar Naal is a day of remembrance for Sri Lankan
Tamil families in the north and east of the country. 11 https://www.concernedhistorians.org/content_files/file/le/816.pdf
DBS Jeyaraj. (n.d.). The
Birth and Growth of the "Maaveerar Naal" (Great Heroes Day) Event.
2 https://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/?p=83174
East Asia Forum. (2024,
October 30). US Congress backs diaspora-driven efforts for Tamil
self-determination. 29 https://eastasiaforum.org/2024/10/30/us-congress-backs-diaspora-driven-efforts-for-tamil-self-determination/
Global R2P. (n.d.). Recommendations
for the 42nd session of the Universal Periodic Review: Sri Lanka. 7 https://www.globalr2p.org/publications/recommendations-for-the-42nd-session-of-the-universal-periodic-review/
HRW. (2023, March 29). Sri
Lanka: IMF loan risks eroding rights. 21
https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/03/29/sri-lanka-imf-loan-risks-eroding-rights
HRW. (2024). World
Report 2024: Sri Lanka. 17 https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2024/country-chapters/sri-lanka
HRW. (2024, March 12). Sri
Lanka: Repression of civic space threatens financial reform. 22 https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/03/12/sri-lanka-repression-civic-space-threatens-financial-reform
IMF. (2024, November 27). Transcript
of press briefing: Sri Lanka. 33
https://www.imf.org/en/news/articles/2024/11/27/tr112724-transcript-of-press-briefing-sri-lanka
IMF. (2025). Sri Lanka:
Third review under the extended arrangement under the extended fund facility.
6 https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/2025/162/article-A000-en.xml
IMF. (2025). Staff-Level
Agreement on the Fifth Review under the EFF Arrangement. 5 https://www.imf.org/en/news/articles/2025/10/09/pr25335-sri-lanka-imf-staff-reaches-sla-on-fifth-review-under-eff-arrangement
IMF. (2025, June 16). This
time must be different: Lessons from Sri Lanka's recovery and debt
restructuring. 18 https://www.imf.org/en/news/articles/2025/06/16/sp061625-gg-this-time-must-be-different-lessons-from-sri-lankas-recovery-and-debt-restructuring
IMF. (2025). The
authorities reiterated their intention to accelerate the pace of reforms. 20 https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/2025/162/article-A001-en.xml
IMF. (2025). The
program supports Sri Lanka's efforts to durably restore macroeconomic stability.
19 https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/2025/162/article-A000-en.xml
Lanka Web. (2025, November
24). Maaveerar Naal, LTTE commemoration and the politics of selective memory.
3 https://www.lankaweb.com/news/items/2025/11/24/maaveerar-naal-ltte-commemoration-and-the-politics-of-selective-memory/
PEARL. (2024, November). Maaveerar
Naal Statement 2024. 34 https://pearlaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Maaveerar-Naal-Statement-2024.pdf
Queens Law Global Justice.
(n.d.). Introduction: Navigating the complex terrain of accountability in
Sri Lanka. 23 https://globaljustice.queenslaw.ca/news/special-issue-accountability-in-sri-lanka
Sri Lanka Campaign. (2025,
May 18). Mullivaikkal Remembrance Day 2025: Memory, mourning and the long
struggle for justice. 25 https://srilankacampaign.org/mullivaikkal-remembrance-day-2025-memory-mourning-and-the-long-struggle-for-justice/
Tamil Eelam Library.
(n.d.). Thuyilum Illam. 10
https://telibrary.com/en/thuyilum-illam/
Tamil Guardian. (n.d.). Explainer:
What is a Thuyilum Illam. 9 https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/explainer-what-thuyilum-illam
Tamil Guardian. (n.d.). Final
preparations for Maaveerar Naal at thuyilum illams across the Tamil homeland.
14 https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/final-preparations-maaveerar-naal-thuyilum-illams-across-tamil-homeland
Tamil Guardian. (n.d.). Maaveerar
Naal commemorated across Kilinochchi. 15
https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/maaveerar-naal-commemorated-across-kilinochchi
Tamil Guardian. (n.d.). Muslim
Maaveerar in the Tamil struggle. 31
https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/muslim-maaveerar-tamil-struggle-3
Tamil Guardian. (n.d.). Preparations
begin in Mannar for Maaveerar Day commemoration. 16 https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/preparations-begin-mannar-maaveerar-day-commemoration
Tamil Guardian. (n.d.). Sri
Lanka continues ban on Tamil organisations despite government change. 28 https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/sri-lanka-continues-ban-tamil-organisations-despite-government-change
Tamil Guardian. (n.d.). Sri
Lanka will not allow photographs of fallen cadres for Maaveerar Naal. 4 https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/sri-lanka-will-not-allow-photographs-fallen-cadres-maaveerar-naal
Tamil Guardian. (n.d.). Tamil
political parties and civil society urge UN to refer Sri Lanka to ICC. 24 https://tamilguardian.com/content/tamil-political-parties-and-civil-society-urge-un-refer-sri-lanka-icc
UPR Info. (2023, March). Joint
Civil Society Submission on Sri Lanka. 8
https://upr-info.org/sites/default/files/country-document/2023-03/JS9_UPR42_LKA_E_Main.pdf
US Department of State.
(n.d.). 2023 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Sri Lanka. 35 https://www.state.gov/reports/2023-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/sri-lanka/
US Department of State.
(n.d.). 2024 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Sri Lanka. 26 https://www.state.gov/reports/2024-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/sri-lanka
UK Government. (2025,
August). Country Policy and Information Note: Tamil separatism, Sri Lanka.
12 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/sri-lanka-country-policy-and-information-notes/country-policy-and-information-note-tamil-separatism-sri-lanka-august-2025-accessible
Wikipedia. (n.d.). Maaveerar
Naal. 1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maaveerar_Naal
Wikipedia. (n.d.). Sri
Lankan Civil War. 36 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sri_Lankan_civil_war
Wikipedia. (n.d.). COVID-19
pandemic. 37 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic
Works
cited
Maaveerar
Naal - Wikipedia, accessed November 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maaveerar_Naal
The
Birth and Growth of the “Maaveerar Naal” (Great Heroes Day) Event. -
dbsjeyaraj.com, accessed November 26, 2025, https://dbsjeyaraj.com/dbsj/?p=83174
Maaveerar
Naal, LTTE Commemoration, and the Politics of Selective Memory - LankaWeb,
accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.lankaweb.com/news/items/2025/11/24/maaveerar-naal-ltte-commemoration-and-the-politics-of-selective-memory/
Sri
Lanka will not allow photographs of fallen cadres on Maaveerar Naal | Tamil
Guardian, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/sri-lanka-will-not-allow-photographs-fallen-cadres-maaveerar-naal
IMF
Staff Reaches Staff-Level Agreement on the Fifth Review Under Sri Lanka's
Extended Fund Facility Arrangement, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.imf.org/en/news/articles/2025/10/09/pr25335-sri-lanka-imf-staff-reaches-sla-on-fifth-review-under-eff-arrangement
Sri
Lanka: Third Review Under the Extended Arrangement Under the Extended Fund
Facility, Financing Assurances Review, and Monetary Policy Consultation
Clause-Press Release; Staff Report; and Statement by the Executive Director for
Sri Lanka, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.imf.org/en/publications/cr/issues/2025/03/03/sri-lanka-third-review-under-the-extended-arrangement-under-the-extended-fund-facility-562827
Recommendations
for the 42nd Session of the Universal Periodic Review, accessed November 26,
2025, https://www.globalr2p.org/publications/recommendations-for-the-42nd-session-of-the-universal-periodic-review/
Sri
Lanka's Universal Periodic Review 4th Cycle January 2023 - UPR info, accessed
November 26, 2025, https://upr-info.org/sites/default/files/country-document/2023-03/JS9_UPR42_LKA_E_Main.pdf
Explainer
- what is a Thuyilum Illam? | Tamil Guardian, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/explainer-what-thuyilum-illam
Fallen
freedom fighters and their uprising after the death – “Thuyilum Illam” - Tamil
Heritage, accessed November 26, 2025, https://telibrary.com/en/thuyilum-illam/
7
February 2024 Excellency, We have the honour to address you in our capacities
as Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, - Network of Concerned
Historians, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.concernedhistorians.org/content_files/file/le/816.pdf
Country
policy and information note: Tamil separatism, Sri Lanka, August 2025
(accessible), accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/sri-lanka-country-policy-and-information-notes/country-policy-and-information-note-tamil-separatism-sri-lanka-august-2025-accessible
Joint
Civil Society – Persisting Denial of the Right to Truth, Memory and
Memorialisation ... - Adayaalam Centre for Policy Research, accessed November
26, 2025, https://adayaalam.org/joint-civil-society-persisting-denial-of-the-right-to-truth-memory-and-memorialisation-joint-civil-society/
Final
preparations for Maaveerar Naal at Thuyilum Illams across Tamil homeland,
accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/final-preparations-maaveerar-naal-thuyilum-illams-across-tamil-homeland
Maaveerar
Naal commemorated across Kilinochchi | Tamil Guardian, accessed November 26,
2025, https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/maaveerar-naal-commemorated-across-kilinochchi
Families
and former fighters begin Maaveerar Naal preparations in Mannar - Tamil
Guardian, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/preparations-begin-mannar-maaveerar-day-commemoration
World
Report 2024: Sri Lanka | Human Rights Watch, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2024/country-chapters/sri-lanka
This
Time Must be Different: Lessons from Sri Lanka's Recovery and Debt
Restructuring, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.imf.org/en/news/articles/2025/06/16/sp061625-gg-this-time-must-be-different-lessons-from-sri-lankas-recovery-and-debt-restructuring
Front
Matter in: IMF Staff Country Reports Volume 2025 Issue 162 (2025), accessed
November 26, 2025, https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/2025/162/article-A000-en.xml
Sri
Lanka: Fourth Review Under the Extended Arrangement Under the Extended Fund
Facility, Requests for Waiver of Applicability of Performance Criteria,
Modification of Performance Criteria, and Financing Assurances Review-Press
Release; Staff Report; and Statement by the Executive Director for Sri Lanka
in: IMF Staff Country Reports Volume 2025 Issue 162 (2025) - IMF eLibrary -
International Monetary Fund, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/2025/162/article-A001-en.xml
Sri
Lanka: IMF Loan Risks Eroding Rights - Human Rights Watch, accessed November
26, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/03/29/sri-lanka-imf-loan-risks-eroding-rights
Sri
Lanka: Repression of Civic Space Threatens Financial Reform - Human Rights
Watch, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/03/12/sri-lanka-repression-civic-space-threatens-financial-reform
Special
Issue: Navigating the Complex Terrain of Accountability in Sri Lanka, accessed
November 26, 2025, https://globaljustice.queenslaw.ca/news/special-issue-accountability-in-sri-lanka
Tamil
political parties and civil society urge UN to refer Sri Lanka to the ICC,
accessed November 26, 2025, https://tamilguardian.com/content/tamil-political-parties-and-civil-society-urge-un-refer-sri-lanka-icc
Mullivaikkal
Remembrance Day 2025: Memory, Mourning and the Long Struggle for Justice,
accessed November 26, 2025, https://srilankacampaign.org/mullivaikkal-remembrance-day-2025-memory-mourning-and-the-long-struggle-for-justice/
2024
Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Sri Lanka - U.S. Department of
State, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.state.gov/reports/2024-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/sri-lanka
Human
rights in Sri Lanka - Amnesty International, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/asia-and-the-pacific/south-asia/sri-lanka/report-sri-lanka/
Sri
Lanka continues ban on Tamil organisations despite government change, accessed
November 26, 2025, https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/sri-lanka-continues-ban-tamil-organisations-despite-government-change
US
Congress backs diaspora-driven efforts for Tamil self-determination - East Asia
Forum, accessed November 26, 2025, https://eastasiaforum.org/2024/10/30/us-congress-backs-diaspora-driven-efforts-for-tamil-self-determination/
£SRI
LANKA @Deliberate killings of Muslim and Tamil villagers in Polonnaruwa -
Amnesty International, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.amnesty.org/es/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/asa370101992en.pdf
Sinhala,
Muslim and Burgher Maaveerar of the Tamil Eelam Struggle, accessed November 26,
2025, https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/muslim-maaveerar-tamil-struggle-3
The
Aragalaya Protest Movement and the Struggle for Political Change in Sri Lanka,
accessed November 26, 2025, https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2025/08/sri-lanka-aragalaya-protest-movement-oust-wickremesinghe-rajapaksa?lang=en
Transcript
of Press Briefing: Sri Lanka, November 2024 - International Monetary Fund,
accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.imf.org/en/news/articles/2024/11/27/tr112724-transcript-of-press-briefing-sri-lanka
Maaveerar
Naal Statement 2024 - People for Equality and Relief in Lanka, accessed
November 26, 2025, https://pearlaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Maaveerar-Naal-Statement-2024.pdf
Sri
Lanka - United States Department of State, accessed November 26, 2025, https://www.state.gov/reports/2023-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/sri-lanka/
Sri
Lankan civil war - Wikipedia, accessed November 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sri_Lankan_civil_war
COVID-19
pandemic - Wikipedia, accessed November 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic


Comments
Post a Comment
We would love to hear your thoughts! Whether you have feedback, questions, or ideas related to our initiatives, please feel free to share them in the comment section below. Your input helps us grow and serve our community better. Join the conversation and let your voice be heard!- ABC Tamil Oli (ECOSOC)