US Air Force Humanitarian Landing in Jaffna: Implications for Tamil Communities and Regional Geopolitics


Humanitarian Airlift and Geopolitical Crossroads: The US Air Force Landing at Jaffna International Airport and Its Implications for Sri Lanka’s Tamils and Regional Power Dynamics

A Comprehensive Analysis of the December 2025 US Humanitarian Operation in Northern Sri Lanka, Stakeholder Responses, and the Future of Tamil Engagement with International Actors


Introduction

In December 2025, the United States Air Force executed a high-profile humanitarian airlift to Jaffna International Airport in Sri Lanka’s Northern Province, delivering critical aid to communities devastated by Cyclone Ditwah. This operation, unprecedented in its visibility and scale for the region, has reverberated far beyond immediate disaster relief. It has triggered a complex interplay of local gratitude, Tamil aspirations, Indian strategic anxieties, and broader questions about the evolving geopolitical landscape of the Indian Ocean. This report provides a comprehensive, evidence-based analysis of the facts, stakeholder responses, and the multifaceted implications of the US presence in Jaffna, with a particular focus on the Tamil-speaking communities of Sri Lanka’s North, East, and Central (Malaiyagam) regions.


Section I: The US Air Force Landing in Jaffna - Facts, Timeline, and Official Statements

1.1 The Humanitarian Operation: Timeline and Logistics

On December 8, 2025, a United States Air Force C-130J Super Hercules aircraft landed at Jaffna International Airport (JAF), marking the first such US military operation at this facility since its post-war reopening1. The mission was part of a broader US response to Cyclone Ditwah, which struck Sri Lanka in late November, causing catastrophic flooding, landslides, and widespread displacement-particularly in the Tamil-majority Northern and Central regions. The cyclone left at least 639 dead, 203 missing, and nearly 78,000 displaced, with over a million affected across the island23.

The US operation involved two C-130J aircraft and a 60-member relief team from the 36th Contingency Response Group (CRG), operating out of Guam, with support from the 374th Airlift Wing (Yokota Air Base, Japan) and the US Marine Corps’ III Marine Expeditionary Force (Okinawa, Japan)4. The airlift delivered essential supplies-temporary shelters, food, water, sanitation and hygiene kits, and medical aid-directly to Jaffna and other affected areas, including Mattala, Ampara, and Anuradhapura1. The US team coordinated closely with Sri Lanka’s Disaster Management Center and the Sri Lanka Air Force (SLAF), leveraging newly donated US airlift-support equipment valued at $2.1 million5.

The operation concluded on December 14, 2025, with the departure of US and Indian military aircraft after a week of intensive relief flights and ground support.

1.2 Official Statements: US, Sri Lankan, and Local Authorities

US Government:
US Ambassador to Sri Lanka Julie Chung, present at the arrival of the aircraft, emphasized the mission’s humanitarian focus:

“The United States is here to take on some heavy lifting-bringing American airlift and logistics muscle to push critical supplies into the hardest-hit areas so Sri Lanka’s frontline teams can stay focused on people, not transportation. The United States stands steadfast with Sri Lanka in this challenging time, committed to supporting recovery and rebuilding efforts.”6

Matthew House, the US Embassy’s Senior Defense Official and Defense Attaché, highlighted the significance of logistics:

“America is here with airlift capacity and coordination to keep that lifeline of critical assistance moving. The C-130J Super Hercules is a workhorse airlifter-built to move essential cargo rapidly and reliably when access is limited.”

The US Department of State announced $2 million in emergency assistance within 72 hours of the cyclone’s landfall, with additional support for airlift and logistics, and reaffirmed its commitment to ongoing coordination with the Sri Lankan government6.

Sri Lankan Authorities:
Jaffna International Airport officials issued a statement expressing “heartfelt gratitude to everyone who continues to stand with and support Sri Lanka during this challenging time,” and underscored the importance of international solidarity in recovery efforts1.

The Chief of Staff of the Sri Lanka Air Force, Air Vice Marshal Lasitha Sumanaweera, formally thanked the US and Indian air crews at the conclusion of their missions, recognizing their “dedicated service, close cooperation and valuable assistance”.

Local Officials and Community Leaders:
While direct statements from Northern Province political leaders were limited in official releases, local media and civil society organizations in Jaffna and the wider North-East acknowledged the significance of the US operation, both as immediate relief and as a symbol of international engagement in a region long marginalized by the central government7.

1.3 The Nature of Humanitarian Aid Delivered

The US airlift brought a substantial consignment of relief materials, including:

·       Temporary shelter materials (tents, tarpaulins)

·       Safe water and water purification supplies

·       Sanitation and hygiene kits

·       Food assistance

·       Medical supplies and health services support

·       Logistics equipment for the SLAF (fuel trucks, forklifts, flood lights, ground power units, portable cargo-loading platforms)1

This aid was distributed in coordination with Sri Lankan authorities, prioritizing the most severely affected communities in the North and Central highlands, where state capacity was overwhelmed and local infrastructure devastated2.

1.4 The Symbolic and Operational Significance of the Landing

The arrival of a US Air Force C-130J at Jaffna International Airport was not only a logistical milestone but also a powerful symbol. It demonstrated the airport’s capacity to handle large military transport aircraft, challenging previous assertions about its limitations and opening new possibilities for international engagement in the region8. The operation was conducted with unusual transparency and media visibility, marking a departure from the US’s historically discreet approach to military disaster assistance in Sri Lanka5.


Section II: India’s Response and the Geopolitical Context

2.1 India’s Official and Unofficial Response

Official Statements and Diplomatic Posture:
As of mid-December 2025, the Indian Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) had not issued a direct public statement specifically addressing the US Air Force landing at Jaffna. However, India’s broader approach to Sri Lanka’s crisis and external involvement is discernible from recent official communications and policy trends910.

In a December 2024 joint press conference with Sri Lankan President Anura Kumara Dissanayaka, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi reaffirmed India’s commitment to Sri Lanka’s reconstruction, reconciliation, and the aspirations of the Tamil people. He emphasized “security interests are interconnected” and highlighted ongoing Indian support for infrastructure, education, and humanitarian projects in the North and East, including scholarships for Jaffna students and support for the Kankesanthurai Port and railway signaling10.

On the issue of external actors, India has historically insisted-via the 1987 Indo-Lanka Accord and subsequent diplomatic practice-that Sri Lankan territory should not be used for activities inimical to Indian security interests11. Indian officials have consistently sought assurances that foreign military presence, especially in the North and East, would not threaten India’s strategic position.

Indian Media and Strategic Commentary:
Indian media coverage of the US operation was generally factual, noting the humanitarian context and the parallel deployment of Indian Air Force MI-17 helicopters for relief operations in Sri Lanka. However, strategic analysts and think tanks have expressed nuanced concerns:

·       Geopolitical Sensitivities: Indian analysts note that the US military’s visible presence in Jaffna, even under humanitarian auspices, is a significant development in a region where India has long sought to maintain primacy and limit third-party military access12.

·       Precedent and Symbolism: The operation is seen as setting a precedent for future international engagement in the Tamil-majority North, potentially diluting India’s exclusive role as the region’s external patron and interlocutor11.

·       Operational Transparency: Some Indian commentators interpret the US’s high-profile approach as a signal to both Sri Lanka and India that Washington intends to play a more assertive role in Indian Ocean humanitarian and security affairs5.

Unofficial and Regional Reactions:
In Tamil Nadu, Indian media and political circles have historically advocated for greater international attention to the plight of Sri Lankan Tamils. The US operation was welcomed by some as a positive step, though concerns remain about the long-term implications for India’s influence and the risk of external actors “playing the Tamil card” in regional geopolitics11.

2.2 Prior Official Statements on Jaffna Airport Capacity and Restrictions

Jaffna International Airport (formerly Palaly) has a complex history, shaped by war, reconstruction, and regional politics. The airport’s runway, currently 1,400 meters (4,593 feet) long, was initially certified for aircraft with up to 75 seats, limiting its use to smaller regional planes such as the ATR 728. Indian financial and technical assistance was instrumental in the airport’s post-war redevelopment, but both Indian and Sri Lankan authorities previously insisted that Jaffna would serve as a regional, not long-haul, airport, and that larger aircraft would not be accommodated until further upgrades were completed13.

The successful landing of a US C-130J Super Hercules-a much larger military transport-demonstrated the airport’s latent capacity and challenged prior restrictions. This has strategic implications, as it opens the door for future international operations, both humanitarian and otherwise, in a region of acute geopolitical sensitivity8.

2.3 India’s Strategic Interests and the US Presence in Northern Sri Lanka

India’s strategic calculus in Sri Lanka’s North and East is shaped by several factors:

·       Historical Ties and Security Concerns: The Tamil-majority Northern Province is ethnically, linguistically, and culturally intertwined with South India, particularly Tamil Nadu. India has long viewed the region as within its sphere of influence and has acted to prevent external military footholds that could threaten its security or maritime interests12.

·       Geoeconomic Engagement: In recent years, India has shifted toward a geoeconomic strategy, investing in energy, infrastructure, and connectivity projects in Trincomalee and the North, aiming to create interdependence and counterbalance Chinese and other external influence10.

·       Concerns Over Third-Party Involvement: The arrival of US military aircraft in Jaffna, even for humanitarian purposes, is viewed with caution. Indian analysts warn that such precedents could be leveraged by other powers (notably China) to justify their own presence, potentially eroding India’s privileged position and complicating its efforts to manage the Tamil issue and regional security11.


Section III: Impact on Tamil Communities - Justice, Reconciliation, and International Engagement

3.1 The Humanitarian Context and Local Realities

The US airlift arrived at a time of acute humanitarian need. Cyclone Ditwah disproportionately affected Tamil-majority districts in the North, East, and Central highlands, compounding the vulnerabilities of communities still recovering from decades of war, displacement, and economic marginalization14. Local civil society organizations and diaspora networks had repeatedly raised concerns about delays and inequities in state-led relief distribution, and the arrival of international aid was widely welcomed as a lifeline7.

3.2 Justice, Truth-Finding, and Reconciliation Processes

Persistent Demands for Accountability:
Tamil communities in the North and East continue to demand justice for wartime atrocities, enforced disappearances, land grabs, and ongoing militarization. Demonstrations during the June 2025 visit of UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk in Jaffna highlighted calls for international justice, forensic investigations of mass graves, and an end to impunity7.

Civil society letters and protests emphasized:

·       The need for international criminal justice mechanisms for genocide and war crimes

·       Forensic investigations into mass graves (e.g., Chemmani, Mannar)

·       An end to land grabs and cultural erasure

·       Answers for the forcibly disappeared

·       Repeal of repressive laws (PTA, Online Safety Act)

·       A durable political solution and meaningful devolution of power7

Perceptions of International Involvement:
The US operation was seen by many Tamils as a positive sign of international attention and willingness to engage directly with the North, bypassing the often indifferent or hostile central government. However, skepticism remains about the depth and durability of such engagement, given the history of unfulfilled promises and shifting foreign policy priorities15.

3.3 The Right to Self-Determination and Political Aspirations

The Tamil struggle for self-determination-whether as federal autonomy or independent statehood-remains a central, if contested, aspiration in the North and East7. The arrival of the US Air Force, while primarily humanitarian, was interpreted by some as a symbolic recognition of the region’s distinct identity and needs. Local activists and diaspora organizations have called for greater international involvement in supporting Tamil rights, transitional justice, and political solutions.

However, the defeat of the LTTE in 2009 and subsequent state policies have left the Tamil community politically fragmented, disempowered, and under surveillance. Many survivors express despair at the lack of progress on justice and reconciliation, and fear that international engagement may be fleeting or instrumentalized for broader geopolitical aims14.

3.4 Local and Diaspora Tamil Reactions

Local Reactions:
Grassroots responses in Jaffna and the wider North-East were generally positive, with expressions of gratitude for the timely aid and the visibility it brought to the region’s plight1. Civil society leaders, however, cautioned that humanitarian relief must be accompanied by sustained international advocacy for justice, rights, and political inclusion7.

Diaspora Engagement:
The global Tamil diaspora, particularly in Europe and North America, has long lobbied for greater US and international involvement in Sri Lanka’s Tamil regions. The Jaffna airlift was celebrated as a breakthrough, but diaspora organizations continue to press for more robust US support for accountability, human rights, and political solutions, wary of aid being used to normalize or legitimize ongoing state repression7.


Section IV: Opportunities for Tamil Engagement with the USA

4.1 Pathways for Engagement

The US operation has opened several avenues for Tamils in Sri Lanka to engage with the United States:

·       Civil Society Partnerships: The US Department of State’s Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor (DRL) has announced funding opportunities to strengthen civil society advocacy and resilience in the North and East, focusing on human rights, women’s and youth empowerment, and connecting local actors with international mechanisms16.

·       Direct Dialogue: The presence of US diplomats and military personnel in Jaffna creates opportunities for local leaders, NGOs, and community organizations to establish direct channels of communication, bypassing central government bottlenecks.

·       Diaspora Advocacy: The operation has energized diaspora networks to intensify lobbying for sustained US engagement on justice, accountability, and political rights for Tamils in Sri Lanka.

·       Monitoring and Reporting: Enhanced US attention may facilitate more rigorous monitoring of human rights conditions, aid distribution, and reconciliation processes in the North and East.

4.2 Challenges and Limitations

·       Aid Conditionality and Political Will: While the US has provided substantial humanitarian and development assistance to Sri Lanka over decades, recent years have seen funding freezes and increased scrutiny of aid effectiveness and transparency17. The Trump administration’s 2025 USAID freeze has disrupted many ongoing projects, raising questions about the reliability and sustainability of US support.

·       Geopolitical Constraints: US engagement in the Tamil regions is constrained by the need to balance relations with Colombo and New Delhi, and by the risk of being perceived as interfering in Sri Lanka’s internal affairs or as a counterweight to Chinese influence11.

·       Local Capacity and Security: Civil society organizations in the North and East face ongoing surveillance, intimidation, and resource constraints, limiting their ability to fully leverage international partnerships18.


Section V: Geopolitical, Humanitarian, and Symbolic Implications - Benefits and Drawbacks for Tamil-Speaking Communities

5.1 Geopolitical Implications

Benefits:

·       Diversification of External Engagement: The US presence offers Tamil communities an alternative to exclusive reliance on India, potentially increasing their leverage and visibility in international forums11.

·       Checks and Balances: The involvement of multiple external actors (US, India, China) may create a more competitive environment, reducing the risk of any single power dominating or instrumentalizing the Tamil issue for its own ends.

·       Internationalization of the Tamil Question: The operation signals to Colombo and the world that the North and East are not off-limits to international humanitarian and political engagement.

Drawbacks:

·       Risk of Geopolitical Instrumentalization: There is a danger that Tamil suffering and aspirations may be used as pawns in great power competition, with little lasting benefit for local communities.

·       Potential Backlash: Increased US involvement could provoke nationalist backlash from the Sri Lankan state or Sinhalese majority, leading to further securitization and repression in the North and East.

·       Strained India-Tamil Relations: India may perceive US engagement as encroaching on its sphere of influence, potentially complicating its own support for Tamil causes or leading to a recalibration of its policies11.

5.2 Humanitarian Implications

Benefits:

·       Timely Relief: The US airlift provided critical, life-saving aid to communities that might otherwise have been neglected or underserved by state mechanisms.

·       Capacity Building: The donation of logistics equipment and joint operations with the SLAF may enhance local disaster response capacity for future crises.

·       Visibility and Advocacy: The high-profile nature of the operation drew international attention to the ongoing vulnerabilities and needs of Tamil-speaking regions.

Drawbacks:

·       Aid Dependency: Reliance on external humanitarian interventions may undermine local agency and reinforce patterns of dependency.

·       Uneven Distribution: There are concerns that aid may not reach the most marginalized or may be co-opted by local elites or state actors.

·       Short-Term Focus: Humanitarian relief, while essential, does not address the structural causes of Tamil marginalization, such as political exclusion, militarization, and lack of justice.

5.3 Symbolic Implications

Benefits:

·       Recognition of Distinct Identity: The US operation, by landing directly in Jaffna, implicitly acknowledges the distinct needs and status of the Tamil-majority North.

·       Empowerment and Hope: For many Tamils, the visible presence of the US military and diplomats in Jaffna is a source of hope and a reminder that their plight is not forgotten by the world.

Drawbacks:

·       Ephemeral Attention: There is a risk that the symbolic value of the operation will fade if not followed by sustained engagement and concrete progress on justice and rights.

·       False Expectations: Over-interpretation of the US presence as a sign of political support for Tamil autonomy or self-determination could lead to disappointment or disillusionment.


Table: Pros and Cons of US Humanitarian Involvement for Tamil-Speaking Communities

Dimension

Potential Benefits

Potential Drawbacks

Geopolitical

- Diversifies external engagement<br>- Increases leverage with Colombo and India<br>- Internationalizes Tamil issues

- Risk of being used as pawns in great power rivalry<br>- Potential backlash from state/nationalists<br>- Strained India-Tamil relations

Humanitarian

- Timely, life-saving relief<br>- Capacity building for local disaster response<br>- Raises global awareness

- Aid dependency<br>- Uneven distribution or co-optation<br>- Short-term focus, neglecting structural issues

Symbolic

- Recognition of Tamil identity and needs<br>- Empowers local and diaspora advocacy<br>- Hope for international justice

- Ephemeral attention if not sustained<br>- Risk of false expectations<br>- Possible disappointment if no follow-up

Justice & Rights

- Opportunity to engage US on accountability, rights, and reconciliation<br>- Leverage for civil society

- US may prioritize stability over justice<br>- Aid may be decoupled from political solutions

Engagement

- Direct dialogue with US officials<br>- Access to funding and partnerships<br>- Diaspora mobilization

- Security risks for activists<br>- Local capacity constraints<br>- Risk of surveillance or repression

Analysis:
The table above summarizes the complex trade-offs facing Tamil-speaking communities as they navigate the opportunities and risks of US humanitarian involvement. While the immediate benefits are tangible and significant, the long-term outcomes will depend on the ability of local actors to leverage international engagement for structural change, and on the willingness of the US and other powers to sustain their commitment beyond episodic interventions.


Section VI: Stakeholder Responses - Comparative Analysis

6.1 Sri Lankan Government

The central government welcomed the US humanitarian operation, emphasizing international solidarity and the importance of rapid relief for cyclone-affected communities1. However, there was little indication of a shift in policy toward greater devolution, justice, or reconciliation for the North and East. The government continues to resist international accountability mechanisms and maintains a heavy security presence in Tamil-majority areas18.

6.2 Indian Government

India maintained a cautious but supportive stance, highlighting its own parallel relief operations and ongoing development assistance in the North and East10. Indian officials reiterated the importance of interconnected security interests and the need for a humanitarian approach to issues such as fisheries and reconstruction. However, India remains wary of external military presence in the region and is likely to intensify its own engagement to counterbalance US and Chinese influence11.

6.3 Tamil Political and Civil Society Actors

Tamil leaders and organizations in the North and East welcomed the US operation as a sign of international concern and a potential catalyst for greater engagement on justice, rights, and political solutions7. However, they remain skeptical of the central government’s willingness to implement meaningful reforms and are cautious about the risk of being instrumentalized in broader geopolitical contests.

6.4 Diaspora and International Advocacy Groups

Diaspora organizations have seized on the US operation to renew calls for sustained international involvement in Sri Lanka’s Tamil regions, linking humanitarian aid to demands for accountability, devolution, and protection of minority rights. They continue to lobby US and other Western governments to condition aid and engagement on progress toward justice and reconciliation7.


Section VII: Conclusion and Forward-Looking Perspectives

The December 2025 US Air Force landing at Jaffna International Airport represents a watershed moment in the intersection of humanitarian relief, Tamil aspirations, and regional geopolitics. It has provided immediate, life-saving assistance to communities in dire need, demonstrated the capacity and potential of Jaffna as an international gateway, and signaled to all stakeholders that the North and East of Sri Lanka remain of global concern.

For Tamil-speaking communities, the operation offers both hope and caution. It opens new avenues for engagement with the United States and the broader international community, but also exposes them to the risks of geopolitical instrumentalization and the vagaries of shifting foreign policy priorities. The challenge ahead is to translate the visibility and goodwill generated by this operation into sustained advocacy, structural reforms, and genuine progress on justice, rights, and political inclusion.

For India, the US presence in Jaffna is a reminder of the need to recalibrate its approach to the Tamil regions, balancing its strategic interests with the legitimate aspirations of the local population and the realities of an increasingly multipolar Indian Ocean.

For the United States and other international actors, the operation is both an opportunity and a test: can humanitarian engagement be leveraged to support long-term reconciliation, accountability, and empowerment for marginalized communities, or will it remain a fleeting gesture in the face of entrenched political and structural barriers?

The answers will depend on the actions of all stakeholders in the months and years to come.


Appendix: Key Hyperlinked Sources

·  

  1. US humanitarian aid flight arrives in Jaffna – Newswire

  2. US humanitarian flight delivers crucial aid to Jaffna – Hiru News

  3. US and Indian military aircraft conclude humanitarian missions in Sri Lanka – Zira Daily

  4. U.S. INDOPACOM Deploys Airlift and Logistics Support for Sri Lanka’s Cyclone Ditwah Response – US Embassy

  5. US airlifters, airmen and Marines arrive in Sri Lanka for cyclone relief – Stars and Stripes

  6. The United States Provides Life-Saving Assistance to Sri Lanka in the Wake of Tropical Cyclone Ditwah – US State Department

  7. Jaffna International Airport – Wikipedia

  8. From Geopolitics to Geoeconomics: Trincomalee’s Transition and India-Sri Lanka Relations – ORF

  9. India’s Ministry of External Affairs – Official Statements

  10. Demonstrators in Jaffna demand justice as UN rights chief visits – Tamil Guardian

  11. UNHRC Urged to Intervene as Sri Lankan Tamils Face Continued Oppression and Injustice – Sri Lanka Brief

  12. US Disaster Airlift Marks Sharp Shift from Past Secrecy – Financial Chronicle

  13. Self-determination: A Ceylon Tamil perspective – Conciliation Resources

  14. 15 years on, the Tamil survivors of Sri Lanka's brutal civil war live in fear — and disempowerment – The Independent


End of Report


References (19)

1. US Humanitarian Aid Flight Arrives at Jaffna International Airport for .... https://www.news.lk/current-affairs/us-humanitarian-aid-flight-arrives-at-jaffna-international-airport-for-cyclone-relief

9. MEA . https://www.mea.gov.in/Speeches-Statements.htm?50/Speeches__amp;_Statements

10. English Translation of Press Statement by Prime Minister at the Joint .... https://www.mea.gov.in/Speeches-Statements.htm?dtl/38796

11. From Partner to Patron: How India is influencing control over Sri Lanka .... https://www.lankaweb.com/news/items/2025/07/03/from-partner-to-patron-how-india-is-influencing-control-over-sri-lankas-northern-province/

12. Sri Lanka’s northern fishermen finding themselves ensnared in the .... https://trincocss.org/sri-lankas-northern-fishermen-finding-themselves-ensnared-in-the-growing-geopolitical-rivalry-throughout-the-indian-ocean/

13. Jaffna International Airport - Daily FT. https://www.ft.lk/Columnists/Jaffna-International-Airport/4-688074

15. Self-determination: A Ceylon Tamil perspective . https://www.c-r.org/accord/sri-lanka/self-determination-ceylon-tamil-perspective

16. DRL FY24 Supporting Civil Society Advocacy and Resilience in Sri Lanka. https://www.state.gov/drl-fy24-supporting-civil-society-advocacy-and-resilience-in-sri-lanka/

18. 15 years on, the Tamil survivors of Sri Lanka's brutal civil war live .... https://www.independent.co.uk/news/ap-sri-lanka-jaffna-united-nations-united-states-b2554897.html

2. Weather Alert - Travel Concerns due to Cyclonic Storm 'Ditwah' - U.S .... https://lk.usembassy.gov/weather-alert-travel-concerns-due-to-cyclonic-storm-ditwah/

3. The United States Provides Life-Saving Assistance to Sri Lanka in the .... https://www.state.gov/releases/office-of-the-spokesperson/2025/12/the-united-states-provides-life-saving-assistance-to-sri-lanka-in-the-wake-of-tropical-cyclone-ditwah/

4. NEWS - pacom.mil. https://www.pacom.mil/Media/NEWS/Category/0/

5. US Disaster Airlift Marks Sharp Shift from Past Secrecy. https://srilankachronicle.com/us-disaster-airlift-marks-sharp-shift-from-past-secrecy/

6. US airlifters, airmen and Marines arrive in Sri Lanka for cyclone .... https://www.stripes.com/branches/air_force/2025-12-10/sri-lanka-cyclone-us-air-force-marines-relief-20044226.html

7. UNHRC Urged to Intervene as Sri Lankan Tamils Face Continued Oppression .... https://srilankabrief.org/unhrc-urged-to-intervene-as-sri-lankan-tamils-face-continued-oppression-and-injustice/

8. Sri Lanka - 2.2.5 Jaffna International Airport . https://lca.logcluster.org/sri-lanka-225-jaffna-international-airport

14. Demonstrators in Jaffna demand justice as UN rights chief visits. https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/demonstration-jaffna-highlights-tamil-suffering-during-un-rights-chiefs-visit

17. United States Strengthens Partnership with Sri Lanka Through Additional .... https://lk.usembassy.gov/united-states-strengthens-partnership-with-sri-lanka-through-additional-24-5-million-rs-7-2-billion-development-agreement/ 

Comments