International Law Violations in the US, Israel, Iran, and Middle East Conflict

International Law Violations in the US, Israel, Iran, and Middle East Conflict

Monitoring and Documenting Potential Violations of International Law in the Ongoing Conflict Involving the United States, Israel, Iran, and the Broader Middle East (2023-2026)


Executive Summary

The ongoing conflict involving the United States, Israel, Iran, and the broader Middle East has escalated dramatically since late February 2026, following joint U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran that resulted in the assassination of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and widespread attacks on Iranian military and civilian infrastructure. Iran’s retaliatory missile and drone campaigns have targeted U.S. bases, Gulf states, and Israeli cities, while the conflict has reignited hostilities in Lebanon and further destabilized the region. These developments have compounded the humanitarian catastrophe already unfolding in Gaza since October 2023, where allegations of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide have been substantiated by international bodies.

This report provides a comprehensive, up-to-date analysis of the conflict’s legal context, documented incidents, and the assessments of international organizations, human rights groups, and legal experts. It examines the application of the Geneva Conventions, the Rome Statute, the UN Charter, and customary international law, and scrutinizes the mechanisms for accountability, including the International Criminal Court (ICC) and International Court of Justice (ICJ). The report draws on open-source intelligence (OSINT), forensic standards, and the latest humanitarian impact metrics to monitor and document alleged violations by all parties.

Key findings include:

·       Widespread and systematic attacks on civilians and civilian infrastructure by all major parties, including the U.S., Israel, Iran, and their proxies, with documented incidents such as the Minab (Shajareh Tayyebeh) school attack, the assassination of Khamenei, Iranian missile strikes on Gulf states, and the ongoing devastation in Gaza.

·       Potential violations of international law including war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, and crimes of aggression, as defined by the Geneva Conventions, the Rome Statute, and the UN Charter.

·       International condemnation and calls for accountability from the United Nations, human rights organizations, and legal experts, with ongoing investigations and legal proceedings at the ICC and ICJ.

·       Severe humanitarian impacts: mass displacement (over 700,000 in Lebanon alone), famine in Gaza, destruction of health and education infrastructure, and widespread civilian casualties.

·       Obstruction of information and accountability through internet blackouts, censorship, and attacks on journalists and humanitarian workers.

The report concludes that the conflict has reached a critical juncture, with mounting evidence of grave breaches of international law by multiple parties. Robust, independent investigations and international accountability mechanisms are urgently needed to address ongoing violations and prevent further escalation.


Background

Historical Context and Escalation

The roots of the current conflict trace back decades, with U.S.-Iranian relations deteriorating after the 1979 Islamic Revolution and subsequent events such as the Iran hostage crisis and U.S. involvement in the 1953 coup. Tensions escalated in the early 2000s over Iran’s nuclear program and regional influence, particularly after the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq and the emergence of the so-called “Axis of Resistance” led by Iran.

The 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) sought to limit Iran’s nuclear capabilities in exchange for sanctions relief, but the U.S. withdrawal from the deal in 2018 under President Trump reignited hostilities. By 2024-2025, Israel’s military campaigns had weakened Iran’s regional allies, notably Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Assad regime in Syria. Direct clashes between Israel and Iran intensified, culminating in a 12-day war in June 2025, followed by U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities.

In late 2025 and early 2026, Iran faced severe economic crisis and mass protests, met with brutal crackdowns by security forces. The U.S. threatened intervention if protesters were killed, and by February 2026, the region was on the brink of war.

Outbreak of the 2026 Iran Conflict

On February 28, 2026, the United States and Israel launched coordinated airstrikes across Iran, targeting military infrastructure and leadership. Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei was killed in a precision strike in Tehran, alongside other senior officials1. The opening salvo, dubbed Operation Epic Fury, involved nearly 900 strikes in the first 12 hours.

Iran responded with massive missile and drone barrages against U.S. bases and Gulf states, as well as Israeli cities. The conflict rapidly expanded, drawing in Hezbollah in Lebanon and threatening to engulf the entire region1.

Regional and Global Impact

The conflict has caused:

·       Over 2,000 deaths in Iran, Lebanon, and Israel within the first weeks.

·       Hundreds of thousands displaced in Lebanon and other countries2.

·       Severe disruption of global energy markets due to attacks and blockades in the Strait of Hormuz, through which 20% of the world’s oil passes3.

·       Widespread destruction of civilian infrastructure, including schools, hospitals, water and power facilities, and ports.

The war has also exacerbated the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza, where Israeli military operations since October 2023 have resulted in tens of thousands of deaths, mass displacement, and famine4.


Legal Framework

Geneva Conventions and Customary International Humanitarian Law (IHL)

The four Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their Additional Protocols form the cornerstone of international humanitarian law, protecting civilians, the wounded, prisoners of war, and medical personnel during armed conflict. Key principles include:

·       Distinction: Parties must distinguish between combatants and civilians, and between military objectives and civilian objects.

·       Proportionality: Attacks that may cause incidental loss of civilian life or damage to civilian objects must not be excessive in relation to the anticipated military advantage.

·       Precaution: All feasible precautions must be taken to minimize harm to civilians and civilian objects.

·       Protection of medical and educational facilities: Hospitals, schools, and other civilian infrastructure are protected unless used for military purposes5.

Grave breaches, such as willful killing, torture, unlawful deportation, and attacks on protected objects, constitute war crimes and require prosecution by states or international courts.

Rome Statute and ICC Jurisdiction

The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) defines the most serious international crimes:

·       Genocide: Acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group.

·       Crimes against humanity: Widespread or systematic attacks against civilians, including murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, torture, rape, persecution, enforced disappearance, apartheid, and other inhumane acts.

·       War crimes: Grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions, including intentional attacks on civilians, civilian objects, humanitarian personnel, and the use of prohibited weapons or tactics.

·       Crime of aggression: The planning, preparation, initiation, or execution of acts of aggression in manifest violation of the UN Charter6.

The ICC has jurisdiction over crimes committed on the territory of or by nationals of states parties, or when referred by the UN Security Council. The ICC has confirmed its jurisdiction over crimes committed in the State of Palestine since June 2014 and has issued arrest warrants for leaders of both Israel and Hamas.

UN Charter and the Crime of Aggression

The UN Charter prohibits the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state (Article 2(4)), except in self-defense or with Security Council authorization (Articles 39-51)7. The crime of aggression under the Rome Statute is defined as the use of armed force by a state against another state in manifest violation of the Charter.

Customary international law, as affirmed by the International Court of Justice (ICJ), recognizes the prohibition of the use of force and the principle of non-intervention as jus cogens norms-fundamental principles from which no derogation is permitted7.

Definitions and Elements of Alleged Crimes

The elements of war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, and aggression are detailed in the Rome Statute and its Elements of Crimes document:

·       War crimes: Require intentional acts against protected persons or objects, knowledge of the civilian status, and a nexus to armed conflict.

·       Crimes against humanity: Must be part of a widespread or systematic attack against civilians, with knowledge of the attack.

·       Genocide: Requires specific intent (dolus specialis) to destroy a protected group, established through direct evidence or inference from conduct and statements.

·       Aggression: Involves leadership responsibility for manifest violations of the UN Charter6.

International Accountability Mechanisms

·       International Criminal Court (ICC): Prosecutes individuals for the most serious international crimes.

·       International Court of Justice (ICJ): Adjudicates disputes between states, including genocide cases (e.g., South Africa v. Israel).

·       UN Human Rights Council and Special Procedures: Monitor and report on violations, issue recommendations, and engage with states.

·       Universal Jurisdiction: Allows national courts to prosecute international crimes regardless of where they were committed8.


Documented Incidents

Table 1: Key Incidents and Alleged Violations (Feb-Mar 2026)

Date

Incident Description

Alleged Perpetrator(s)

Alleged Violations

Location

Feb 28, 2026

Joint U.S.-Israeli strikes kill Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and officials

United States, Israel

Crime of aggression, targeted killing

Tehran, Iran

Feb 28, 2026

U.S. strike hits girls’ school near Bandar Abbas, ~170 killed

United States

War crime (attack on civilian object)

Minab, Iran

Mar 1-5, 2026

Iranian missile and drone retaliation across Gulf states

Iran

War crimes (indiscriminate attacks)

UAE, Saudi Arabia, etc.

Mar 2, 2026

Hezbollah launches missiles/drones into Israel

Hezbollah (Iran-aligned)

War crimes (indiscriminate attacks)

Israel

Mar 2-5, 2026

Israeli airstrikes on southern Lebanon and Beirut

Israel

War crimes (civilian harm, displacement)

Lebanon

Mar 3, 2026

Israeli strike on Assembly of Experts building

Israel

Crime of aggression, targeting governance

Tehran, Iran

Mar 2026

Iranian attacks on oil infrastructure and shipping in Strait of Hormuz

Iran

War crimes (economic warfare, civilian harm)

Strait of Hormuz, Gulf

Jan 8, 2026

Iranian security forces kill at least 30,000 protesters

Iran

Crimes against humanity

Tehran, Iran

Table adapted from multiple sources including Britannica, ACLED, and UN reports

Elaboration

These incidents represent only a fraction of the documented violations. Each case involves complex legal and factual questions regarding targeting, proportionality, distinction, and command responsibility. The following case studies provide detailed analysis of selected incidents.


Case Study 1: Minab (Shajareh Tayyebeh) Primary School Attack (28 Feb 2026)

Incident Overview:
On February 28, 2026, a U.S. Tomahawk missile strike destroyed the Shajareh Tayyebeh girls’ elementary school in Minab, Hormozgan province, Iran. The attack, reportedly a “triple tap,” killed between 168 and 180 people, primarily schoolgirls aged 7-12, and injured 95 others9.

Location and Context:
The school was adjacent to, but walled off from, a former IRGC naval base. Satellite imagery and OSINT confirmed the school had been a civilian institution since at least 2016, with no military function at the time of the strike10.

Legal Assessment:
International humanitarian law experts and UN human rights experts characterized the strike as a potential war crime. The school and its students were protected under IHL; the attack failed to meet the requirements of distinction and proportionality. Investigations by Human Rights Watch, The New York Times, CBC, and Bellingcat confirmed the use of a U.S. Tomahawk missile and found no evidence of military use of the school11.

Accountability:
A preliminary U.S. military investigation acknowledged responsibility, attributing the strike to outdated targeting data. Human Rights Watch and UN officials called for a thorough, independent investigation and prosecution of those responsible. The attack has been widely condemned as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions and a violation of the Rome Statute11.

Table: Summary of Minab School Attack

Date

Location

Victims

Alleged Perpetrator

Description

Legal Assessment

28 Feb 2026

Minab, Iran

168-180 killed (mostly girls), 95 injured

United States Armed Forces

Triple-tap missile strike on girls’ school

Potential war crime under Rome Statute; violation of IHL


Case Study 2: Strikes on Tehran and Killing of Supreme Leader (28 Feb 2026)

Incident Overview:
On February 28, 2026, Israeli Air Force, supported by the U.S. Air Force and Navy, conducted a precision airstrike on Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s residence in Tehran, killing Khamenei and several family members. The operation was reportedly planned by Mossad and the CIA12.

Legal Assessment:
Legal experts and analysts have raised concerns about the legality of the targeted killing of a foreign head of state, citing the UN Charter’s prohibition on the use of force and the Rome Statute’s provisions on crimes of aggression. The strike is viewed by many as a manifest violation of the Charter and a dangerous precedent for international law12.

Aftermath:
The assassination triggered mass protests, further destabilized Iran, and led to the appointment of Mojtaba Khamenei as Supreme Leader. Diplomatic efforts for a ceasefire were disrupted, and the conflict escalated regionally.


Case Study 3: Iranian Missile and Drone Campaign Across the Gulf (March 2026)

Incident Overview:
Between March 1 and 8, 2026, Iran launched hundreds of missiles and thousands of drones at U.S. bases, Gulf states (UAE, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar), and Israeli cities. While many projectiles were intercepted, several struck civilian infrastructure, including airports, oil facilities, desalination plants, and residential areas13.

Civilian Impact:

·       In Bahrain, a drone attack damaged a water desalination plant and injured three people.

·       In Kuwait, drones struck fuel storage tanks at the international airport and a social security headquarters.

·       In Saudi Arabia, a missile struck a residential area in Al Kharj, killing two and injuring 12.

·       In the UAE, drone debris killed one person in Dubai.

Legal Assessment:
UN Security Council Resolution 2817 (2026) condemned Iran’s “egregious attacks” on civilian objects and demanded their immediate cessation14. UN experts and human rights organizations characterized the attacks as indiscriminate and in violation of IHL, potentially constituting war crimes.


Case Study 4: Gaza War (Oct 2023-2025) - Alleged Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity

Incident Overview:
Since October 2023, Israeli military operations in Gaza have resulted in over 69,000 Palestinian deaths, including more than 19,000 children, and the injury of over 170,000. The conflict has involved widespread destruction of homes, schools, hospitals, and infrastructure, forced displacement, and the use of starvation as a weapon15.

Legal Proceedings and Findings:

·       The ICC has issued arrest warrants for Israeli and Hamas leaders for war crimes and crimes against humanity.

·       The ICJ is hearing a genocide case brought by South Africa against Israel, with provisional measures ordered to prevent genocidal acts16.

·       The 2025 UNHRC Commission of Inquiry concluded that Israel committed four out of five acts specified in the Genocide Convention, establishing both actus reus and genocidal intent15.

Humanitarian Impact:

·       Famine declared in Gaza Governorate, with projections of famine in Deir al-Balah and Khan Younis4.

·       97% of schools and 84% of health facilities damaged or destroyed.

·       Over 1.2 million people displaced since March 2025.

Table: Key Violations in Gaza War

Date

Incident

Alleged Perpetrator

Alleged Violations

Oct 2023-2025

Attacks on hospitals, schools, infrastructure

Israel

War crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide

Oct 2023-2025

Forced displacement, blockade, starvation

Israel

War crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide

Oct 2023-2025

Use of human shields, summary executions

Israel, Hamas

War crimes

Oct 2023-2025

Sexual violence, torture, mass graves

Israel, Hamas

War crimes, crimes against humanity


Case Study 5: Attacks on Hospitals, Medical Personnel, and Health Infrastructure

Incident Overview:
Both in Iran and Gaza, attacks on hospitals and medical personnel have been widespread. In Gaza, 94% of hospitals have been damaged or destroyed, with only 19 of 36 remaining operational as of May 2025. Israeli strikes have targeted hospitals, ambulances, and health workers, while Iranian facilities have also been hit during U.S.-Israeli airstrikes17.

Legal Assessment:
Such attacks violate the Geneva Conventions’ protections for medical units and personnel and constitute grave breaches and war crimes unless the facilities are being used for military purposes, which must be substantiated.


Case Study 6: Attacks on Schools, Children, and Education Facilities

Incident Overview:
The Minab school attack is the most egregious recent example, but in Gaza, 97% of schools have been damaged or destroyed, with thousands of students and staff killed. Israeli forces have repeatedly struck schools used as shelters, resulting in mass casualties.

Legal Assessment:
Attacks on schools are prohibited unless they are being used for military purposes, which must be verified. The scale and pattern of attacks suggest systematic targeting, raising concerns of war crimes and crimes against humanity.


Case Study 7: Forced Displacement and Evacuation Orders

Incident Overview:

·       In Lebanon, Israeli evacuation orders and bombardment have displaced nearly 700,000 people, including 200,000 children2.

·       In Gaza, over 1.2 million have been displaced since March 2025, with repeated forced evacuations and destruction of homes.

·       In Iran, mass displacement has occurred in areas targeted by U.S.-Israeli strikes.

Legal Assessment:
Forced displacement of civilians, except for their security or imperative military reasons, is prohibited under the Geneva Conventions and constitutes a war crime and, when systematic, a crime against humanity.


Case Study 8: Attacks on Civilian Infrastructure

Incident Overview:

·       Iranian attacks have targeted oil facilities, desalination plants, airports, and ports in Gulf states, causing civilian harm and economic disruption.

·       Israeli operations in Gaza have destroyed water, power, and sanitation infrastructure, contributing to famine and disease.

Legal Assessment:
Attacks on objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population, such as water and food infrastructure, are prohibited and may constitute war crimes and, in the context of Gaza, acts of genocide.


Case Study 9: Attacks on Maritime Shipping and Strait of Hormuz Incidents

Incident Overview:
Since February 28, 2026, Iran has imposed a de facto blockade on the Strait of Hormuz, attacking commercial vessels and causing casualties among seafarers and port workers. The disruption has affected 20% of global oil shipments and prompted international naval responses3.

Legal Assessment:
Attacks on civilian shipping and blockades that cause disproportionate harm to civilians violate the law of armed conflict and may constitute war crimes.


Case Study 10: Media, Censorship, Internet Shutdowns, and Information Integrity

Incident Overview:
Iran has imposed a near-total internet blackout since January 2026, intensifying after the February 28 strikes. The blackout has obstructed documentation of abuses, hindered humanitarian response, and inflicted severe economic harm18.

Legal Assessment:
Deliberate suppression of communication to conceal violations and obstruct accountability may itself constitute a violation of international human rights law and impede the investigation and prosecution of war crimes.


Analysis

Legal and Forensic Standards for Evidence

The ICC and other international bodies require evidence to meet standards of relevance, authenticity, reliability, and credibility. Types of evidence include:

·       Written documents and records: Official reports, orders, communications.

·       Testimonial evidence: Witness statements, survivor accounts.

·       Physical and forensic evidence: Weapons fragments, medical records, satellite imagery.

·       Digital and electronic evidence: OSINT, videos, photographs, intercepted communications.

Chain of custody, expert analysis, and corroboration are essential for admissibility. Open-source investigations (e.g., Bellingcat, BBC Verify) have played a crucial role in verifying incidents such as the Minab school attack19.

Attribution, Command Responsibility, and State Responsibility

Under the Rome Statute (Article 28), military commanders and civilian superiors are criminally responsible for crimes committed by subordinates if they knew or should have known and failed to prevent or punish the crimes20. State responsibility is also engaged for violations of international law, with obligations to investigate, prosecute, and provide reparations.

Weapons, Tactics, and Technological Issues

The conflict has seen extensive use of:

·       Drones and missiles: Both sides have used drones and precision-guided munitions, with varying degrees of accuracy and collateral damage.

·       AI-guided targeting: Reports indicate the use of AI in Israeli targeting, raising concerns about tolerance for civilian casualties and the adequacy of human oversight.

·       Explosive weapons in populated areas: The use of heavy explosive weapons in urban settings has caused indiscriminate harm, as highlighted by the ICRC21.

Media, Censorship, and Information Integrity

Censorship, internet shutdowns, and attacks on journalists have severely impeded independent documentation and reporting. In Gaza, over 220 journalists have been killed since October 2023. In Iran, the blackout has reduced internet connectivity to 1% of normal levels, with plans for permanent digital isolation18.

Domestic Investigations and National Accountability Measures

While some parties have announced internal investigations (e.g., U.S. military inquiry into the Minab school attack), there is widespread skepticism about their independence and effectiveness. Human rights organizations have called for transparent, impartial, and international investigations.

International Diplomatic and Sanctions Responses

The UN Security Council has condemned Iranian attacks on Gulf states but has been divided on broader accountability, with Russia and China abstaining or opposing resolutions perceived as biased. The ICC and ICJ have initiated proceedings, while several states have imposed sanctions or suspended arms transfers in response to violations14.

Precedents and International Jurisprudence

The ICJ’s 1986 Nicaragua judgment affirmed the prohibition of the use of force and non-intervention as customary international law. The ICC’s arrest warrants for Israeli and Hamas leaders mark a significant step in international accountability for ongoing conflicts7.

Humanitarian Impact Metrics

·       Casualties: Over 2,000 killed in Iran, Lebanon, and Israel in the first weeks of the 2026 conflict; over 69,000 killed in Gaza since October 2023.

·       Displacement: Nearly 700,000 displaced in Lebanon; over 1.2 million in Gaza; hundreds of thousands in Iran and Gulf states.

·       Famine and health crises: Famine declared in Gaza; widespread malnutrition, disease, and collapse of health systems.

·       Destruction of infrastructure: Massive damage to schools, hospitals, water and power facilities, and civilian housing.

Databases, Datasets, and Mapping Tools

·       ACLED: Provides live data on conflict events and casualties1.

·       UN OCHA: Tracks displacement, humanitarian needs, and aid delivery.

·       IPC Famine Review Committee: Monitors food security and malnutrition in Gaza4.

·       TRIAL International Universal Jurisdiction Map: Tracks prosecutions of international crimes worldwide8.

Monitoring and Update Methodology

This report synthesizes information from a wide range of sources, including official reports, OSINT, satellite imagery, human rights investigations, and academic analysis. It is updated as new information becomes available, with a focus on corroborating evidence and maintaining forensic standards.


Conclusions

The ongoing conflict involving the United States, Israel, Iran, and the broader Middle East has resulted in widespread and systematic violations of international law by multiple parties. The evidence reviewed in this report supports credible allegations of:

·       War crimes: Including intentional attacks on civilians and civilian objects, indiscriminate bombardment, forced displacement, starvation as a weapon, and attacks on medical and educational facilities.

·       Crimes against humanity: Widespread or systematic attacks on civilian populations, including murder, extermination, torture, sexual violence, and persecution.

·       Genocide: In Gaza, the UNHRC Commission of Inquiry and the ICJ have found evidence of genocidal acts and intent by Israeli authorities.

·       Crimes of aggression: The initial U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran, including the assassination of Supreme Leader Khamenei, have been widely condemned as acts of aggression in violation of the UN Charter.

International accountability mechanisms are engaged, with ongoing investigations and legal proceedings at the ICC and ICJ. However, effective enforcement remains hampered by political divisions, censorship, and the scale of the crisis.

The humanitarian impact is catastrophic: mass displacement, famine, collapse of health and education systems, and the destruction of civilian infrastructure threaten the lives and dignity of millions. The use of internet blackouts and attacks on journalists further obstructs documentation and accountability.

Recommendations:

·       Immediate cessation of hostilities and return to negotiations, as urged by the UN and humanitarian organizations.

·       Independent, transparent investigations into all alleged violations, with full cooperation from all parties.

·       Strengthening of international accountability mechanisms, including support for ICC and ICJ proceedings.

·       Protection and restoration of humanitarian access, including the lifting of blockades and the restoration of essential services.

·       Robust monitoring and documentation of ongoing violations, leveraging OSINT, forensic standards, and international cooperation.

The conflict’s trajectory remains uncertain, but the imperative for accountability, justice, and the protection of civilians is clear. The international community must act decisively to uphold the rule of law and prevent further atrocities.


Tables

Table 2: Summary of Key Incidents and Alleged Violations by Party (Feb 2026-Mar 2026)

Date

Incident Description

Alleged Perpetrator(s)

Alleged Violations

Location

Feb 28, 2026

Joint U.S.-Israeli strikes kill Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and officials

United States, Israel

Crime of aggression, targeted killing

Tehran, Iran

Feb 28, 2026

U.S. strike hits girls’ school near Bandar Abbas, ~170 killed

United States

War crime (attack on civilian object)

Minab, Iran

Mar 1-5, 2026

Iranian missile and drone retaliation across Gulf states

Iran

War crimes (indiscriminate attacks)

UAE, Saudi Arabia, etc.

Mar 2, 2026

Hezbollah launches missiles/drones into Israel

Hezbollah (Iran-aligned)

War crimes (indiscriminate attacks)

Israel

Mar 2-5, 2026

Israeli airstrikes on southern Lebanon and Beirut

Israel

War crimes (civilian harm, displacement)

Lebanon

Mar 3, 2026

Israeli strike on Assembly of Experts building

Israel

Crime of aggression, targeting governance

Tehran, Iran

Mar 2026

Iranian attacks on oil infrastructure and shipping in Strait of Hormuz

Iran

War crimes (economic warfare, civilian harm)

Strait of Hormuz, Gulf

Jan 8, 2026

Iranian security forces kill at least 30,000 protesters

Iran

Crimes against humanity

Tehran, Iran

Oct 2023-2025

Attacks on hospitals, schools, infrastructure in Gaza

Israel

War crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide

Gaza

Oct 2023-2025

Forced displacement, blockade, starvation in Gaza

Israel

War crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide

Gaza

Oct 2023-2025

Use of human shields, summary executions

Israel, Hamas

War crimes

Gaza

Oct 2023-2025

Sexual violence, torture, mass graves

Israel, Hamas

War crimes, crimes against humanity

Gaza


Table 3: Humanitarian Impact Metrics (March 2026)

Metric

Value/Description

Source(s)

Civilian deaths (Iran, Lebanon, Israel, Mar 2026)

>2,000

UN, ACLED

Displaced persons (Lebanon)

~700,000 (200,000 children)

UNHCR, UNICEF

Displaced persons (Gaza)

>1.2 million since March 2025

OCHA, HRW

Famine (Gaza)

IPC Phase 5 (Famine) in Gaza Governorate, projections for Deir al-Balah and Khan Younis

IPC Famine Review Committee

Hospitals damaged/destroyed (Gaza)

94% of hospitals, 84% of health facilities

WHO, HRW

Schools damaged/destroyed (Gaza)

97% of schools, 10,000+ students/staff killed

HRW, UNRWA

Internet connectivity (Iran)

Reduced to 1% of normal levels

NetBlocks, HRW

Oil/gas shipments disrupted

20% of global supply affected by Strait of Hormuz crisis

IEA, UN, ACLED


Ongoing Monitoring and Updates

This report is a living document, updated as new information becomes available. It integrates the latest findings from international organizations, human rights groups, OSINT, and legal experts. Continued monitoring, documentation, and advocacy are essential to ensure accountability and the protection of civilians in this rapidly evolving conflict.


Key Takeaway:
The conflict in the Middle East involving the United States, Israel, Iran, and their allies has resulted in grave violations of international law by multiple parties. The scale and severity of attacks on civilians, civilian infrastructure, and essential services demand urgent international action to investigate, prosecute, and prevent further atrocities. Upholding the principles of distinction, proportionality, and accountability is not only a legal obligation but a moral imperative for the international community.


References (24)

1. Middle East Special Issue: March 2026 . https://acleddata.com/update/middle-east-special-issue-march-2026

2. Nearly 700,000 displaced in Lebanon as Middle East crisis escalates. https://news.un.org/en/story/2026/03/1167098

3. 2026 Strait of Hormuz crisis - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Strait_of_Hormuz_crisis

4. FAMINE REVIEW COMMITTEE: GAZA STRIP, AUGUST 2025. https://www.ipcinfo.org/fileadmin/user_upload/ipcinfo/docs/IPC_Famine_Review_Committee_Report_Gaza_Aug2025.pdf

5. THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS OF 12 AUGUST 1949. https://www.icrc.org/sites/default/files/external/doc/en/assets/files/publications/icrc-002-0173.pdf

10. 2026 Minab school attack - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Minab_school_attack

6. Elements of Crimes - International Criminal Court. https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/NR/rdonlyres/336923D8-A6AD-40EC-AD7B-45BF9DE73D56/0/ElementsOfCrimesEng.pdf

7. Judgment of 27 June 1986 - International Court of Justice. https://www.icj-cij.org/node/103143

8. Universal Jurisdiction Interactive Map - TRIAL International. https://trialinternational.org/universal-jurisdiction-tools/universal-jurisdiction-interactive-map/

9. 2026 Minab school attack - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minab_school_attack

11. Iran: US School Attack Findings Show Need for Reform, Accountability. https://www.hrw.org/news/2026/03/12/iran-us-school-attack-findings-show-need-for-reform-accountability

12. Assassination of Ali Khamenei - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_Ali_Khamenei

13. Bahrain says water desalination plant damaged in Iranian drone attack .... https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/8/bahrain-says-water-desalination-plant-damaged-in-iranian-drone-attack

14. Security Council Adopts Resolution 2817 (2026) Condemning Iran’s .... https://press.un.org/en/2026/sc16315.doc.htm

15. 2025 UNHRC Commission of Inquiry report on Gaza genocide. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_UNHRC_Commission_of_Inquiry_report_on_Gaza_genocide

16. Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the .... https://www.icj-cij.org/case/192

17. Health system at breaking point as hostilities further intensify in .... https://www.who.int/news/item/22-05-2025-health-system-at-breaking-point-as-hostilities-further-intensify--who-warns

18. 2026 Internet blackout in Iran - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Internet_blackout_in_Iran

19. Understanding the Legal Standards for Evidence in the ICC. https://judicade.com/legal-standards-for-evidence-in-icc/

20. Rome Statute article 28 - Responsibility of commanders and ... - public. https://www.public.law/world/rome_statute/article_28_responsibility_of_commanders_and_other_superiors

21. Explosive weapons in populated areas . https://www.icrc.org/en/law-and-policy/explosive-weapons-populated-areas


     In solidarity,

     Wimal Navaratnam

     Human Rights Defender |Independent Researcher | ABC Tamil Oli (ECOSOC)

      Email: tamilolicanada@gmail.com



Comments