Jaffna University Student Protest Over Interrogations Linked to Black Flag Event

By

The Jaffna University Black Flag Protest: Student Activism, State Response, and the Struggle for Democratic Rights in Post-War Sri Lanka

Introduction

The events at the University of Jaffna in February and March 2026-where students hoisted a black flag on Sri Lanka’s Independence Day, subsequently faced police investigations, and called for a boycott and demonstration-have reignited debates about academic freedom, student activism, and the broader human rights context in Sri Lanka’s Northern Province. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the protest, examining its origins, the responses of state and university authorities, the legal and political frameworks at play, and the implications for reconciliation and democratic rights in post-war Sri Lanka. Drawing on a wide array of sources, including news reports, official statements, academic analyses, and human rights documentation, the report situates the Jaffna University protest within the historical and contemporary landscape of Tamil dissent, state surveillance, and the ongoing contest over the meaning of citizenship and autonomy in Sri Lanka.

Background: The Black Flag Event at the University of Jaffna

On February 4, 2026, coinciding with Sri Lanka’s 78th Independence Day, students at the University of Jaffna lowered the national lion flag and hoisted a black flag in its place. This act was a deliberate, symbolic protest, reflecting the sentiment among many Tamils that Independence Day is not a cause for celebration but a day of mourning and unresolved grievance1. The protest was part of a broader wave of black flag demonstrations across the North and East, organized by civil society groups, families of the disappeared, and political representatives. These actions highlighted longstanding demands for justice, self-determination, and an end to what is perceived as ongoing repression in the Tamil homeland.

The black flag, in this context, is a potent symbol. For decades, Tamil communities have marked Independence Day as a “Black Day,” underscoring their exclusion from the post-colonial state and the persistence of discrimination, militarization, and impunity for wartime abuses2. The lowering of the national flag and the raising of the black flag at a major university was thus both a continuation of a historical tradition and a bold assertion of dissent within a space that has long been a crucible of Tamil political consciousness and activism34.

Timeline of Key Events

To contextualize the protest and its aftermath, the following table summarizes the major events and official responses:

Date

Event

Feb 4, 2026

Black flag hoisted at University of Jaffna; national flag lowered; protests across North-East

Feb 5-10, 2026

Internal university inquiry initiated; committee formed (Ethnic Harmony, Disciplinary, Security)5

Feb 16, 2026

DTNA issues statement defending student protest, condemning UGC and state crackdown2

Mar 11, 2026

CID officers enter university, question Vice-Chancellor and Registrar for several hours6

Mar 13, 2026

CID records statements from university officials; police investigation continues7

Mar 16, 2026

Three student leaders summoned for questioning by Crime Prevention Division (CPD)8

Mar 17-18, 2026

Student boycott of lectures; demonstration demanding democratic rights; media coverage intensifies8

Mar 18, 2026

National and international civil society, political parties, and diaspora groups issue statements of concern9

This timeline illustrates the rapid escalation from a symbolic act of protest to a multi-layered confrontation involving university authorities, police, national regulatory bodies, and a spectrum of political and civil society actors.

The black flag event was not an isolated incident but the latest in a series of annual protests and commemorations that have become flashpoints for state surveillance and disciplinary action in the North-East. The swift move by the University Grants Commission (UGC) to demand an inquiry, followed by police and CID involvement, underscores the high stakes attached to acts of symbolic dissent in post-war Sri Lanka6.

The Black Flag Protest: Symbolism, Organization, and Student Demands

Historical and Political Significance

The act of lowering the Sri Lankan flag and raising a black flag on Independence Day is deeply rooted in Tamil political history. Since independence in 1948, many Tamils have viewed the day as marking the consolidation of a Sinhala-Buddhist state and the marginalization of minority communities10. Black flag protests have been a recurring form of expression, signaling mourning for lost rights, unaddressed grievances, and the absence of meaningful autonomy or justice.

At the University of Jaffna, the protest was organized by student unions and supported by a coalition of civil society groups, including associations representing families of the disappeared and Tamil nationalist organizations. The event was carefully choreographed: students dressed in black, carried placards, and read out a declaration stating that “Independence Day for Tamils is the day our homeland becomes free”11. The protest was peaceful and did not involve any reported violence or property damage.

Student Motivations and Demands

According to statements made during the university’s internal inquiry, students emphasized that their actions were intended to communicate that Sri Lanka’s Independence Day cannot be considered meaningful for Tamils as long as their collective aspirations remain unrecognized and unaddressed6. Their demands included:

·       Recognition of the North and East as the Tamil homeland

·       Justice for families of the disappeared

·       Release of political prisoners

·       An end to militarization and surveillance

·       International investigation into alleged human rights violations

These demands echo those raised in previous years and reflect the enduring sense of exclusion and injustice felt by many in the Tamil community2.

Organization and Participation

The protest was notable for its coordination across multiple campuses and towns in the North-East, with similar black flag events and rallies held in Kilinochchi and other locations. At Jaffna University, the action was led by the Students’ Union and the Faculty of Arts Students’ Union, whose leaders were later summoned for police questioning8. The event drew participation from a broad cross-section of students, including women and representatives of various faculties.

The protest’s organization reflected both the resilience of student activism in Jaffna and the challenges of operating under conditions of surveillance and potential reprisal. Students took care to frame their actions within the language of democratic rights and non-violence, emphasizing their commitment to peaceful expression and assembly.

State and University Responses: Investigations, Summons, and Surveillance

University Grants Commission (UGC) and Internal Inquiry

In the immediate aftermath of the protest, the UGC instructed the University of Jaffna administration to conduct an internal inquiry into the incident6. A committee was formed, comprising the professor in charge of Ethnic Harmony, the Student Disciplinary Officer, and the Chief Security Officer. The committee’s mandate was to identify those involved and assess whether university regulations had been violated.

The internal inquiry identified 30 individuals, including two female students, as being directly connected to the act of lowering the national flag and raising the black flag6. The findings were submitted to the UGC, which reportedly called for disciplinary action against the students involved. The UGC’s stance was criticized by student groups and the Democratic Tamil National Alliance (DTNA), who argued that the protest was a legitimate exercise of democratic rights and that punitive measures would only exacerbate tensions2.

Police and CID Investigations

Parallel to the university’s internal process, the Jaffna District Crime Prevention Division (CPD) launched a police investigation into the incident. On March 11, 2026, officers from the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) entered the university campus and questioned the Vice-Chancellor and Registrar for several hours, recording their statements67. Police also indicated that further statements would be taken from university security officers and students identified in connection with the protest.

The presence of police and CID officers on campus, and the prolonged questioning of senior officials, drew criticism from students and some faculty members, who viewed it as an intrusion into university autonomy and an attempt to intimidate both staff and students6. Students expressed particular concern about the manner in which the investigation was conducted, including the use of vehicles to enter the campus and the examination of video footage from the day of the protest.

Summoning of Student Leaders

On March 16, three student leaders-including the Presidents of the University Students’ Union and the Faculty of Arts Students’ Union-were summoned for questioning by the CPD8. The summons were delivered via the University Registrar, with little advance notice, leading to confusion and anxiety among the students. The targeting of student union leaders marked an escalation in the investigation and raised fears of criminalization of political expression within university spaces.

The summoning of students for police questioning over a peaceful, symbolic protest was widely condemned by civil society groups, human rights organizations, and political parties, who argued that it constituted an attack on academic freedom and the right to dissent2.

Legal and Institutional Frameworks: Flag Laws, Protest, and Counter-Terrorism

Laws Governing Flags and Symbols

The legal status of acts such as lowering the national flag or raising alternative symbols is ambiguous in Sri Lankan law. While there have been calls by nationalist politicians to criminalize the defacement or disrespect of the national flag, the Penal Code does not contain a specific provision prohibiting such acts12. Section 120 of the Penal Code does allow for punishment of actions intended to promote “ill-will and hostility between different classes,” but legal experts have noted that the mere act of lowering the flag or raising a black flag would not automatically fall within this provision12.

In practice, however, state authorities have often treated such symbolic acts as provocative or seditious, particularly when they occur in the North-East or are associated with Tamil nationalist sentiment. The lack of clear legal guidance has allowed for discretionary and, at times, arbitrary enforcement, with students and activists facing disciplinary or criminal proceedings for acts of symbolic dissent.

Laws on Protest and Assembly

The right to peaceful assembly and protest is guaranteed under Sri Lanka’s Constitution and international human rights obligations. However, in recent years, the state has increasingly used public order laws, emergency regulations, and counter-terrorism legislation to restrict protests, particularly those deemed politically sensitive or threatening to national unity13.

The Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA), in force since 1979, grants sweeping powers to security forces to arrest and detain individuals without charge for extended periods. Although the current government has pledged to repeal or reform the PTA, it remains in use, and its broad definitions have been criticized for enabling the criminalization of dissent, especially among Tamils and Muslims13.

The Online Safety Act, passed in 2024, further empowers authorities to regulate online speech, with human rights groups warning that it could be used to stifle dissent and constrain academic and student activism14.

Role and Mandate of the Crime Prevention Division and CID

The Crime Prevention Division (CPD) and the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) are specialized units within the Sri Lanka Police, tasked with investigating serious crimes, including those with national security implications15. The CID, in particular, has a history of involvement in politically sensitive cases and has been accused by human rights organizations of engaging in surveillance, intimidation, and harassment of activists, journalists, and civil society actors, especially in the North and East16.

The entry of CID officers onto the Jaffna University campus and their questioning of senior officials and students must be understood within this broader context of securitization and the blurring of boundaries between law enforcement and political control.

Stakeholder Responses: University, Political Parties, Civil Society, and Diaspora

University Authorities and Campus Security

The University of Jaffna administration has been caught between competing pressures: the demands of the UGC and state authorities for disciplinary action, and the expectations of students and faculty for the protection of academic freedom and autonomy. While the university complied with the UGC’s directive to conduct an internal inquiry, there is little evidence that it has taken a strong public stance in defense of student rights or against police intrusion6.

Campus security officers have also been drawn into the investigation, with police indicating that their statements would be recorded as part of the ongoing probe. The presence of security personnel during the protest and their subsequent involvement in the inquiry highlight the complex role of university security in mediating between students and external authorities.

Political Parties

The Democratic Tamil National Alliance (DTNA) was among the first political groups to issue a statement defending the students and condemning the crackdown. The DTNA argued that the hoisting of black flags is a long-standing expression of mourning and dissent, and that penalizing students for such acts is both anti-democratic and unlawful2. The Alliance called on the state to address the underlying causes of Tamil protest rather than resorting to punitive measures.

Other Tamil parties, including the Tamil National Alliance (TNA), have also expressed concern about the criminalization of student activism and the broader pattern of repression in the North-East. Leftist and opposition parties, such as the National People’s Power (NPP), have been more circumspect, reflecting the complexities of coalition politics and the sensitivities surrounding national symbols and unity.

The Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP), the party of the former Rajapaksa regime, has generally supported strong action against what it views as separatist or anti-national activities, although its influence has waned since the 2024 elections14.

Civil Society and Human Rights Organizations

Civil society organizations, both local and international, have condemned the police investigations and the summoning of students for questioning. Human rights groups have highlighted the chilling effect of such actions on academic freedom, freedom of expression, and the right to peaceful assembly13. The targeting of student leaders and the use of security agencies to police university spaces have been cited as evidence of the persistence of authoritarian practices in post-war Sri Lanka.

Associations representing families of the disappeared, a key constituency in the North-East, have linked the crackdown on student protest to the broader pattern of surveillance and intimidation faced by those seeking truth and justice for wartime abuses16.

International and Diaspora Reactions

The events at Jaffna University have resonated with Tamil diaspora communities, particularly in the United Kingdom and Canada, where student organizations and advocacy groups have organized protests and issued statements of solidarity9. The controversy over the invitation of Namal Rajapaksa to speak at the Oxford and Cambridge Unions in February 2026, and the subsequent cancellation of the Cambridge event following diaspora protests, underscores the transnational dimensions of Tamil activism and the ongoing contest over narratives of justice and accountability9.

International human rights organizations and academic networks have also expressed concern about the implications of the crackdown for academic freedom and the prospects for reconciliation in Sri Lanka.

Political and Human Rights Context in Sri Lanka (2024-2026)

Post-Aragalaya Political Landscape

The period from 2022 to 2026 has been marked by significant political upheaval in Sri Lanka. The Aragalaya protest movement of 2022, driven by economic crisis and widespread discontent with the Rajapaksa regime, led to the ouster of President Gotabaya Rajapaksa and the eventual election of Anura Kumara Dissanayake and the National People’s Power (NPP) coalition in 202414. While the new government has pledged reforms and a more inclusive vision of national identity, progress on human rights, accountability, and reconciliation has been limited16.

The United Nations and international human rights bodies have continued to document cases of arbitrary detention, torture, and deaths in custody, noting that “the structural conditions that led to past violations persist”16. In the North and East, state surveillance, land appropriation, and restrictions on memorialization and protest remain pervasive.

Human Rights and Civil Liberties

Despite rhetorical commitments to national reconciliation, the Dissanayake government has made little headway in addressing the legacy of wartime abuses or in building trust with Tamil and Muslim communities16. The Prevention of Terrorism Act remains in force, and the new Online Safety Act has raised concerns about the suppression of dissent and the stifling of civil society.

The Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka and the Office on Missing Persons have been hampered by limited resources, lack of political will, and ongoing threats to victims and activists. Mass graves continue to be discovered, but investigations are slow and often lack transparency or accountability16.

Militarization and Surveillance

Militarization remains a defining feature of governance in the North-East. The presence of military and intelligence personnel in civilian life, including on university campuses, has created an environment of fear and self-censorship17. Women, in particular, face heightened risks of exploitation and insecurity, and the militarization of land has impeded the return of internally displaced persons and the realization of economic and social rights18.

The persistence of surveillance and the use of security agencies to monitor and intimidate activists, journalists, and students have been documented by both local and international observers16.

Academic Freedom and Higher Education in Post-War Sri Lanka

The University of Jaffna: A Site of Contestation

The University of Jaffna has long been a focal point for Tamil political activism, intellectual debate, and, at times, state repression34. Founded in 1974, the university initially drew students and faculty from diverse ethnic backgrounds, but the escalation of conflict and the exodus of Sinhalese and Muslim staff and students in the late 1970s and 1980s transformed it into a predominantly Tamil institution4.

During the civil war, the university was both a site of resistance and a target for state and non-state actors. The LTTE exerted significant influence over campus life, and dissenting academics and students faced threats from both the state and militant groups19. In the post-war period, the university has struggled to reclaim its autonomy and to foster an environment conducive to critical inquiry and democratic participation.

Academic Freedom and University Autonomy

Academic freedom and university autonomy are enshrined in Sri Lankan law and international human rights standards20. The Universities Act of 1978 establishes a framework for self-governance, while Supreme Court determinations have recognized academic freedom as protected under the Constitution.

However, in practice, universities-especially those in the North and East-have faced persistent challenges to their autonomy. State intervention, surveillance, and the politicization of university administration have undermined the ability of academics and students to engage in free and open debate3. Recruitment practices, faculty appointments, and student admissions have at times been shaped by political and ideological considerations, limiting diversity and critical engagement3.

The intrusion of police and security agencies onto university campuses, as seen in the Jaffna black flag incident, represents a direct threat to academic freedom and the principle of the university as a space for dissent and democratic participation.

Student Activism: Traditions and Transformations

Student activism has a long and complex history at the University of Jaffna and in the Tamil homeland more broadly3. From the early days of the university, students played a central role in articulating demands for language rights, autonomy, and social justice. The rise of Tamil militancy in the 1980s and the dominance of the LTTE in the 1990s transformed the nature of activism, with the university becoming both a site of resistance and, at times, a space of enforced conformity.

In the post-war era, student activism has re-emerged as a key force in contesting state policies, commemorating the war dead, and demanding accountability for past and ongoing abuses. However, activists continue to face surveillance, intimidation, and the risk of disciplinary or criminal proceedings.

The black flag protest of 2026 must be understood within this lineage of student activism, as well as in relation to the broader struggles for academic freedom and democratic rights in Sri Lanka.

Media Coverage and Narratives

Local and National Media

Media coverage of the Jaffna University protest has reflected the deep divisions in Sri Lankan society. Tamil-language outlets and independent news organizations have generally framed the protest as a legitimate act of dissent and a reflection of unresolved grievances in the North-East2. Sinhala-language and nationalist media, by contrast, have often portrayed the protest as provocative, anti-national, or even seditious, echoing calls for disciplinary or criminal action against the students involved12.

The role of the media in shaping public perceptions of protest and dissent is significant. Analyses by think tanks such as Verité Research have documented the tendency of mainstream media to label trade unions, student groups, and activists as “terrorists,” “saboteurs,” or “destructive forces,” particularly during periods of political crisis14.

International and Diaspora Media

International coverage has focused on the implications of the protest for human rights, reconciliation, and academic freedom in Sri Lanka. Diaspora media and advocacy organizations have amplified the voices of student activists and civil society groups, linking the events at Jaffna University to broader campaigns for justice and accountability9.

The transnational dimensions of Tamil activism, including the mobilization of diaspora student organizations and the organization of protests abroad, have brought additional attention to the situation in Sri Lanka and increased pressure on both national and international actors to respond.

Comparative Perspectives: Campus Protests and State Responses in Sri Lanka and South Asia

The Jaffna University black flag protest is not unique in the region. Across South Asia, universities have been sites of contestation over national symbols, historical memory, and the boundaries of permissible dissent. In Sri Lanka, similar protests have occurred at other universities, often in response to state policies or commemorative events3.

State responses have varied, but the use of disciplinary proceedings, police investigations, and counter-terrorism laws to suppress student activism is a recurring pattern. The invocation of national security and the protection of national symbols as justifications for restricting protest is common, as is the targeting of student leaders and the use of surveillance and intimidation.

Comparative analysis suggests that the protection of academic freedom and the right to protest requires robust legal safeguards, institutional autonomy, and a political culture that values dissent and pluralism. In the absence of these conditions, universities risk becoming sites of repression rather than engines of critical inquiry and social transformation.

Implications for Reconciliation, Transitional Justice, and Accountability

Reconciliation and Social Cohesion

The events at Jaffna University highlight the fragility of reconciliation and social cohesion in post-war Sri Lanka. The persistence of symbolic protest, the criminalization of dissent, and the ongoing surveillance of Tamil communities underscore the failure to address the root causes of conflict and the grievances of minority populations21.

The National Strategic Action Plan for Social Cohesion and Reconciliation, developed by the Office for National Unity and Reconciliation (ONUR), emphasizes the need for inclusive policies, dialogue, and the protection of rights as foundations for lasting peace21. However, the gap between policy and practice remains wide, and the continued use of security agencies to police dissent undermines trust in state institutions and the prospects for genuine reconciliation.

Transitional Justice and Accountability

The lack of progress on transitional justice and accountability for wartime abuses has contributed to a climate of impunity and ongoing human rights violations16. The targeting of student activists and the use of counter-terrorism laws to suppress protest are symptomatic of a broader reluctance to confront the legacy of violence and to create space for truth-telling and redress.

International human rights bodies have called on the Sri Lankan government to repeal the PTA, ensure the independence of investigative and prosecutorial bodies, and create an enabling environment for civil society and victims’ groups to participate in transitional justice processes13.

Academic Freedom and the Future of Higher Education

The protection of academic freedom and university autonomy is essential for the development of a vibrant, democratic society. The intrusion of police and security agencies into university life, the criminalization of student activism, and the politicization of university administration threaten the ability of higher education institutions to fulfill their role as spaces of critical inquiry, debate, and social transformation22.

Reforms are needed to safeguard the rights of students and academics, to ensure transparent and accountable governance, and to foster a culture of pluralism and respect for dissent.

Risks, Ethics, and Safety for Researchers and Sources

Researching and reporting on sensitive issues such as student activism, state surveillance, and human rights in Sri Lanka carries significant risks. Journalists, academics, and civil society actors have faced threats, harassment, and violence, particularly in the North-East2. The safety of sources and the protection of confidential information are paramount.

Ethical research practices require informed consent, the protection of identities where necessary, and adherence to national and international guidelines on research integrity and human rights23. Researchers must be aware of the potential for reprisals against participants and take steps to minimize harm.

Policy Recommendations and Best Practices

Based on the analysis above, the following recommendations are proposed to protect academic freedom, student rights, and democratic space in Sri Lanka:

1.     Repeal or Reform the Prevention of Terrorism Act and Related Laws: The PTA and similar legislation should be repealed or amended to ensure compliance with international human rights standards and to prevent the criminalization of peaceful protest and dissent13.

2.     Safeguard Academic Freedom and University Autonomy: Universities should be protected from external interference, and mechanisms should be established to ensure transparent, accountable, and participatory governance3.

3.     Protect the Rights of Students and Activists: Disciplinary and criminal proceedings against students for peaceful protest should be halted, and measures should be taken to ensure the safety and well-being of student leaders and activists.

4.     Promote Dialogue and Reconciliation: Inclusive dialogue between students, university authorities, civil society, and state actors should be facilitated to address grievances and build trust.

5.     Strengthen Legal and Institutional Safeguards: Clear legal protections for freedom of expression, assembly, and association should be enacted and enforced, and independent oversight bodies should be empowered to investigate abuses.

6.     Foster a Culture of Pluralism and Respect for Dissent: Educational curricula and public discourse should promote critical thinking, respect for diversity, and the value of dissent in a democratic society.

7.     Ensure the Safety of Researchers and Journalists: National and international organizations should provide support and protection for those documenting and reporting on human rights and academic freedom in Sri Lanka.

Conclusion

The protest at the University of Jaffna in February 2026, and the subsequent state response, encapsulate the enduring tensions at the heart of post-war Sri Lanka: the contest over national identity, the struggle for justice and autonomy, and the challenges of building a democratic, inclusive society. The black flag event was not merely a symbolic act but a powerful assertion of the right to dissent, to remember, and to demand a different future.

The escalation of investigations, the summoning of student leaders, and the involvement of security agencies reflect the persistence of authoritarian practices and the fragility of academic freedom and democratic space. Yet, the resilience of student activism, the solidarity of civil society, and the engagement of international actors offer hope for a more just and pluralistic Sri Lanka.

Addressing the root causes of conflict, protecting the rights of students and academics, and fostering a culture of dialogue and accountability are essential steps toward reconciliation and the realization of democratic rights for all Sri Lankans.

Key Takeaway: The events at Jaffna University are a microcosm of the broader struggles over memory, identity, and rights in Sri Lanka. The protection of academic freedom, the right to protest, and the creation of inclusive, accountable institutions are not only matters of university governance but are central to the prospects for peace, justice, and democracy in the country.

References (25)

1. “Independence Day for Sri Lanka - Black Day for Tamils” Black Flag .... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53HkSGRxhNQ

2. Jaffna University students hoist black flags as DTNA condemns crackdown .... https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/dtna-rejects-ugc-stance-university-black-flag-protest

3. Degrees of peace: universities and embodied experiences of conflict in .... https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/01436597.2022.2038129

4. University of Jaffna: 50 years of challenges, resilience and excellence. https://www.ft.lk/columns/University-of-Jaffna--50-years-of-challenges--resilience-and-excellence/4-767040

5. CID records statements from University of Jaffna’s Vice-Chancellor and .... https://srilankabrief.org/cid-records-statements-from-university-of-jaffnas-vice-chancellor-and-registrar-over-independence-day-protest/

6. Sri Lankan police interrogate Jaffna University officials over black .... https://www.tamilguardian.com/index.php/content/cid-records-statements-jaffna-university-vice-chancellor-and-registrar-over-black-flag

7. Sri Lankan police interrogate Jaffna University officials over black .... https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/cid-records-statements-jaffna-university-vice-chancellor-and-registrar-over-black-flag

8. Jaffna University students summoned as Sri Lankan police widen protest .... https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/three-jaffna-university-students-summoned-over-black-flag-incident

9. Cambridge Union cancels Namal Rajapaksa's address. https://www.newscenter.lk/articles/cambridge-union-cancels-namal-rajapaksa-s-address

10. Sri Lankan Minister proposes law against defacing Sri Lankan flag. https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/sri-lankan-minister-proposes-law-against-defacing-sri-lankan-flag

11. UGC targets Jaffna University students over Black Flag protest. https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/ugc-targets-jaffna-university-students-over-black-flag-protest

12. Half-mast for Minister Weerasekera’s statement on the national flag .... https://www.dailymirror.lk/slide-1/Half-mast-for-Minister-Weerasekeras-statement-on-the-national-flag/329-233735

13. Sri Lanka: Amnesty International commentary on the proposed Protection .... https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/asa37/0766/2026/en/

14. August 2025 The Aragalaya Protest Movement and the Struggle for .... https://carnegie-production-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/static/files/Timberman_Sri%20Lanka-1.pdf

15. SRI LANKA POLICE. https://www.police.lk/

16. A/HRC/ Advance unedited version - UN Human Rights Office. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/hrbodies/hrcouncil/sessions-regular/session60/advance-version/a-hrc-60-21-auv.pdf

17. Understanding Post-War Land Issues in Northern Sri Lanka. http://www.jdslanka.org/index.php/documents/32-displacement-and-land-issues/598-understanding-post-war-land-issues-in-northern-sri-lanka

18. Increased Militarization in the Post-War Context: A Barrier to the .... http://repo.lib.jfn.ac.lk/xmlui/handle/123456789/8576

19. Clash At Jaffna University: Conversations On Culture & History - Part .... https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/clash-at-jaffna-university-conversations-on-culture-history-part-ii/

20. UNESCO Convention & Recommendation against Discrimination in Education. https://www.unesco.org/education/edurights/media/resources/file/Sri_Lanka_National_Report.pdf

21. National Strategic Action Plan for Social Cohesion and Reconciliation. https://onur.gov.lk/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/National-Strategic-Action-Plan-for-Social-Cohesion-and-Reconciliation-Full-Document.pdf

22. Our Public University System, academic freedom and university autonomy. https://arts.pdn.ac.lk/iqac/pdf/Our%20Public%20University%20System,%20academic%20freedom%20and.pdf

23. Research Ethics Committee - Faculty of Medical Sciences. https://medical.sjp.ac.lk/research-ethics-committee/

Comments

Post a Comment

We would love to hear your thoughts! Whether you have feedback, questions, or ideas related to our initiatives, please feel free to share them in the comment section below. Your input helps us grow and serve our community better. Join the conversation and let your voice be heard!- ABC Tamil Oli (ECOSOC)