War and Human Cost Since WWII: Justice Is the Only Solution
130 Conflicts: The UN, ICC, and ICJ
stand as humanity’s defenders.
From Impunity to Accountability: Protecting human life — Global call to action, March 2026.
⚖️ Disclaimer
This report is intended for educational, advocacy, and
public awareness purposes. It synthesizes publicly available data, survivor
testimonies, and historical records as of March 07, 2026. While every effort
has been made to ensure accuracy, some figures may vary due to ongoing
investigations, inaccessible conflict zones, or evolving legal proceedings. The
report does not constitute legal advice or official UN documentation. Readers
are encouraged to consult primary sources and institutional updates for verification.
📝 Editor’s Note
This report was compiled by Wimal Navaratnam, an Independent
Researcher and Human Rights Defender based in Brampton, Canada. It reflects a
commitment to survivor dignity, evidence-based advocacy, and global
accountability. The inclusion of Sri Lanka’s unresolved mass graves, Sudan’s
famine zones, and Ukraine’s civilian devastation is not merely historical — it
is a call to conscience. Every section has been reviewed for factual integrity
and ethical framing. The author welcomes constructive engagement and coalition
use of this material for justice campaigns.
Executive Summary: The Global Conflict Landscape in 2026
As of March 07, 2026, the world stands at a grim crossroads.
The number of active armed conflicts has surged to an unprecedented 130+, spanning every continent and
encompassing a spectrum from high-intensity wars to simmering internal strife.
The cumulative human toll since 1945 is staggering: tens of millions dead, hundreds of millions displaced, and entire
societies scarred by cycles of violence, atrocity, and impunity1.
Despite the lessons of the Second World War and the creation of international
justice mechanisms, war has repeatedly failed as a solution to political,
ethnic, or economic grievances. Instead, it has entrenched suffering, destroyed
futures, and undermined the very fabric of global order.
The current conflict map is marked by major wars from Ukraine and Sudan to Myanmar, Yemen, and the Middle
East, alongside a proliferation of internal armed conflicts (NIACs), frozen
wars, and tension zones with nuclear escalation risks 2. The humanitarian impact is acute: over 117 million forcibly displaced people,
including 73.5 million internally displaced and 36.4 million refugees as of
mid-20251. Civilian casualties, gender-based violence, and the
destruction of infrastructure have become defining features of modern warfare,
exacerbated by new technologies such as drones and cyber operations 3.
The failure of war as
a solution is evident in the persistence and recurrence of conflicts, the
deepening of grievances, and the inability of domestic or international actors
to deliver sustainable peace or justice. In this context, the United Nations (UN), the International Criminal Court (ICC), and
the International Court of Justice (ICJ)
represent the last hope for accountability, evidence preservation, and the
protection of civilian rights. Yet, these institutions face mounting
challenges: political deadlock, selective enforcement, and the erosion of
multilateral norms4.
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the major
conflicts since WWII, the root causes and superpower dynamics, the aftermath of
the Soviet collapse, global conflict patterns, and the evolving role of
international justice. It concludes with an urgent call to action for global
reform, justice, and the protection of civilians.
Major Conflicts Since WWII: Death Tolls, Destruction, and Atrocities
Methodology for Death Toll Estimates
Estimating the human cost of war is fraught with challenges:
incomplete records, destruction of evidence, differing methodologies, and
political manipulation of data. Most reputable sources, such as the Uppsala
Conflict Data Program (UCDP), ACLED, and the UN, provide ranges for death tolls, distinguishing between direct
battle-related deaths and indirect deaths from famine, disease, and
displacement 5. Civilian casualties often far exceed military
losses, especially in internal conflicts.
Key Wars and Their Human Toll
·
Vietnam
War (1955-1975): 1.3-4.2 million dead. The war devastated Indochina, with
widespread civilian casualties from bombing, chemical defoliants, and forced
displacement.
·
Korean
War (1950-1953): 2.5-3.5 million dead. Marked by massive civilian losses,
destruction of infrastructure, and unresolved division of the Korean Peninsula.
·
Nigerian
Civil War (1967-1970): 3.04-4.1 million dead, including deaths from famine
in Biafra.
·
Soviet-Afghan
War (1979-1989): 1-3 million dead. The conflict triggered waves of refugees
and set the stage for decades of instability.
·
Bangladesh
Liberation War (1971): 0.3-3 million dead. Atrocities included mass
killings and sexual violence.
·
Ethiopian
Civil War and Eritrean War of Independence (1961-1991): 1.75-2 million
dead.
·
Second
Sudanese Civil War (1983-2005): 1-2 million dead.
·
Angolan
Civil War (1975-2002): 0.8 million dead.
·
Yugoslav
Wars (1991-2001): 130,000-140,000 dead, 4 million displaced. Marked by
genocide, ethnic cleansing, and mass rape6.
·
Syrian
Civil War (2011-2024): 580,000-610,000 dead. The war saw the use of
chemical weapons, sieges, and mass displacement 2.
·
Russo-Ukrainian
War (2014-present): 350,000-480,000 dead as of early 2026, with over a
million dead or injured since 20227.
·
Sudanese
Civil War (2023-present): 150,000 dead as of early 2026, with atrocities
and famine looming.
·
Sri
Lankan Civil War (1983-2009): 80,000-170,000 dead, with the final phase
marked by mass atrocities and enforced disappearances 8.
2025-2026 Fatality Trends and Recent Hotspots
The past two years have seen a sharp escalation in fatalities in several hotspots:
·
Sudan:
Over 150,000 dead since April 2023, with widespread atrocities and humanitarian
collapse.
·
Ukraine:
Civilian and military casualties continue to mount, with drone warfare and
infrastructure attacks causing new waves of displacement and trauma 9.
·
Myanmar:
The civil war has intensified, with the military junta losing territory but
inflicting severe civilian harm.
·
Middle
East: The Israel-Gaza conflict since October 2023 has resulted in over
85,000 deaths, with the 2024 Israeli invasion of Lebanon and the 2025
Iran-Israel conflict adding thousands more 2.
The Sri Lankan Civil War: Final Phase, Atrocities and the Justice Gap
The Sri Lankan Civil
War (1983-2009) remains a paradigmatic case of unresolved atrocity and
impunity. The final phase (2008-2009) saw the indiscriminate shelling of civilian "No Fire Zones", mass
disappearances, and the deaths of tens of thousands of Tamil civilians.
Estimates of the final death toll range from 40,000 (UN Panel) to 170,000
(Tamil sources), with at least 25,000-60,000 forcibly disappeared 8.
The Chemmani mass
graves and recent discoveries in Mannar and Jaffna have reopened wounds for
the Tamil community. Despite the exhumation of hundreds of skeletons, including
children and infants, investigations have been marred by delays, lack of
resources, and allegations of cover-up. Families of the disappeared continue to
demand international oversight and adherence to forensic best practices, as
domestic mechanisms have failed to deliver truth or justice10.
The justice gap
is stark: no senior officials have been held accountable for war crimes, and
the government's Office of Missing Persons (OMP) is widely seen as ineffective.
The UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) and the Office of the High Commissioner for
Human Rights (OHCHR) have repeatedly called for evidence preservation,
international participation, and the adoption of clear exhumation policies.
Root Causes & Superpowers’ Intentions: Structural Drivers and Proxy
Dynamics
Structural Causes of Conflict
Colonial Borders and
Legacies: The arbitrary borders drawn by colonial powers, especially in
Africa and Asia, have left a legacy of ethnic fragmentation, contested
identities, and weak state institutions. Post-colonial societies are
statistically more prone to civil violence, with ex-British colonies especially
vulnerable to ethnic-based conflicts and ex-Spanish colonies to socio-economic
violence11.
Ethnic Divisions:
Colonial strategies of indirect rule often entrenched ethnic hierarchies,
politicizing identity and sowing seeds for future conflict. In the absence of
inclusive governance, these divisions have repeatedly erupted into violence, as
seen in Nigeria, Rwanda, Sri Lanka, and the Balkans.
Resource Competition:
Many wars are fueled by competition over natural resources-oil, minerals,
water, and arable land. External actors often exploit these dynamics,
supporting proxies to secure access or deny resources to rivals.
Weak Governance:
Low levels of economic development, limited political rights, and corruption
create persistent grievances and lower the opportunity costs of rebellion. Weak
states struggle to maintain law and order, making them vulnerable to insurgency
and external manipulation.
Superpowers’ Intentions and Proxy Dynamics
The United States,
USSR/Russia, China, and India have played pivotal roles in fueling,
prolonging, or attempting to resolve conflicts:
·
Cold War
Era: The US and USSR engaged in global competition through proxy
wars-Vietnam, Afghanistan, Angola, and Latin America-often supporting opposing
sides to advance ideological and strategic interests12.
·
Post-Cold
War: Proxy dynamics have become more complex, with sponsors backing proxies
of all political stripes. The Russo-Ukrainian war, Syrian civil war, and Yemen
conflict exemplify the overt support of proxies, escalation to direct
intervention, and the use of advanced weaponry.
·
China:
While historically cautious, China has increased its support for proxies in
South Asia and Africa, using economic and military aid to counter US influence
and secure resources.
·
India:
Pursues "strategic autonomy," balancing relations with the US,
Russia, and China, while engaging in its own proxy dynamics in South Asia
(e.g., support for groups in Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Afghanistan).
Proxy wars allow superpowers to externalize costs, pursue
limited objectives, and avoid confrontation, especially where nuclear
escalation is a risk. However, they also exacerbate instability, prolong
conflicts, and complicate accountability.
Soviet Fall and Aftermath: Ethnic and Regional Conflicts Unleashed
The collapse of the
USSR (1989-1991) triggered a wave of ethnic and regional conflicts across
Eastern Europe, the Caucasus, and Central Asia:
·
Yugoslavia:
The breakup of the multi-ethnic federation led to a decade of wars marked by
genocide, ethnic cleansing, and mass displacement. The Bosnian genocide and
Srebrenica massacre remain defining atrocities, with the ICTY prosecuting
senior leaders 6.
·
Chechnya:
Two brutal wars (1994-1996, 1999-2009) between Russia and Chechen separatists
resulted in up to 230,000 deaths, widespread destruction, and ongoing
repression.
·
Nagorno-Karabakh:
The Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh has flared repeatedly,
with the most recent escalation in 2020-2023 resulting in thousands of deaths
and renewed displacement.
·
Sri
Lanka: The early 1990s saw an intensification of the armed conflicts (NIAC),
as the end of Cold War patronage and shifting regional dynamics emboldened both
the government and the LTTE.
The suddenness of political transition, unresolved
territorial disputes, and the resurgence of nationalism fueled these conflicts.
Russian minorities in the new states became flashpoints for intervention, while
weak governance and economic collapse created fertile ground for violence.
Patterns of Global Conflicts & Integrated NIAC List
Defining NIACs (Non-International Armed Conflicts)
A Non-International
Armed Conflict (NIAC) is defined by the Geneva Conventions as armed
conflict occurring within a state, involving government forces and/or organized
non-state armed groups, reaching a minimum threshold of intensity and
organization13. The UCDP and ACLED further classify conflicts by
battle-related deaths, duration, and the involvement of external actors.
Global Patterns
Since 1945, the majority of wars have been internal-civil wars, insurgencies, and NIACs,
rather than interstate conflicts. These wars are often protracted, recurrent,
and marked by high civilian casualties, displacement, and cycles of atrocity.
Integrated NIAC List by Region (Selected Examples)
|
Region |
Conflict/Event
Name (Sample) |
Duration |
Estimated
Deaths |
Status
(2026) |
|
Africa |
Second Congo War |
1998-2003 |
3-5.4 million |
Resolved, fragile |
|
|
Ethiopian Civil War & Tigray War |
1974-1991, 2020-22 |
1.75-2m, 160-600k |
Ceasefire, tensions |
|
|
Sudanese Civil War |
2023-present |
150,000+ |
Active hotspot |
|
|
Somali Civil War |
1991-present |
350,000-1m |
Ongoing |
|
|
Boko Haram Insurgency (Nigeria) |
2009-present |
350,000+ |
Ongoing |
|
Americas |
Colombian Conflict |
1964-present |
450,000+ |
Ongoing, low-level |
|
|
Mexican Drug War |
2006-present |
350,000-400,000 |
Ongoing |
|
|
Haitian Crisis |
2018-present |
Tens of thousands |
State collapse |
|
Asia |
Sri Lankan Civil War |
1983-2009 |
80,000-170,000 |
Ongoing Structural genocide, unhealed |
|
|
Myanmar Conflict |
1948-present |
230,000+ |
Active hotspot |
|
|
Bangladesh Liberation War |
1971 |
300,000-3m |
Resolved |
|
|
Philippines Civil Conflict |
1968-present |
160,000+ |
Ongoing |
|
Europe/Caucasus |
Yugoslav Wars |
1991-2001 |
130,000-140,000 |
Resolved, fragile |
|
|
Chechen Conflict |
1994-2009 |
80,000-230,000 |
Suppressed |
|
|
Russo-Ukrainian War |
2014-present |
350,000-480,000 |
Active hotspot |
|
MENA |
Syrian Civil War |
2011-2024 |
580,000-610,000 |
Ceasefire, fragile |
|
|
Yemeni Civil War |
2014-present |
377,000+ |
Ongoing |
|
|
Iraq War/Insurgency |
2003-2017 |
460,000-1m |
Resolved, fragile |
|
Oceania |
Papua Conflict (Indonesia) |
1962-present |
100,000-500,000 |
Ongoing, low-level |
Table Notes: This
table is a synthesis of UCDP, ACLED, and regional sources142. For a
full, detailed list, see the appendix.
Analysis
The current hotspots-Sudan,
Ukraine, Myanmar, Gaza, Haiti-are characterized by high-intensity violence,
mass displacement, and regional spillover risks. Many "resolved"
conflicts, such as Sri Lanka, remain unhealed, with ongoing grievances, missing
persons, and cycles of repression.
Post-WWI vs. Post-WWII Peace Commitments: League of Nations and United
Nations
League of Nations: Aspirations and Failures
The League of Nations
(1920-1946) was the first global attempt to prevent war through collective
security, disarmament, and arbitration. While it achieved some successes in
economic stabilization and minority protection, it failed to prevent aggression (e.g., Manchuria, Abyssinia) and
lacked enforcement mechanisms. Its inability to act decisively against major
powers, combined with the absence of the US and the rise of appeasement, doomed
it to irrelevance15.
United Nations: Structure and Challenges
The United Nations
(UN), established in 1945, inherited many of the League's agencies but was
designed with stronger enforcement powers, including the Security Council and
binding resolutions. The creation of the UN
Security Council with five permanent members (P5) and veto power was
intended as a safeguard for peace, but has often become a barrier to collective
action, especially in cases involving the interests of the P516.
The UN's peacekeeping
and accountability mechanisms have had mixed results. While the UN has
played crucial roles in mediation, humanitarian aid, and transitional justice
(e.g., ICTY, ICTR), it has often been paralyzed by vetoes and political
divisions. The UNHRC’s Sri Lanka
Accountability Project stands out as a model for evidence preservation and
international advocacy, even as domestic justice remains elusive.
Significance & Influence of the UN, ICC, and ICJ: Global Justice and
Key Cases
The United Nations (UN)
The UN remains the central forum for international
diplomacy, humanitarian coordination, and norm-setting. Its agencies-UNHCR,
OCHA, OHCHR-provide critical support for refugees, evidence preservation, and
human rights monitoring. However, the Security
Council's veto power has repeatedly blocked action on mass atrocities, from
Syria to Gaza to Sudan16.
The International Criminal Court (ICC)
The ICC has
become the primary venue for prosecuting individuals for genocide, war crimes,
and crimes against humanity. Notable cases include:
·
Arrest
warrants for Vladimir Putin and Russian officials for the unlawful
deportation of Ukrainian children and attacks on civilians during the
Russo-Ukrainian War, the first such warrant against a P5 leader 4.
·
Warrants
for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Hamas leaders for alleged
war crimes in Gaza (2024-2025), highlighting the court's willingness to
challenge powerful actors.
·
Taliban
leaders and other non-state actors have also been indicted for crimes in
Afghanistan.
The ICC faces challenges: non-cooperation by major powers,
selective enforcement, and accusations of bias. Yet, its actions have made
indicted leaders international pariahs, restricting their travel and signalling
that impunity is no longer guaranteed.
The International Court of Justice (ICJ)
The ICJ
adjudicates disputes between states and issues advisory opinions on
international law. Recent cases include:
·
Orders to
Israel to prevent and reduce harm to civilians in Gaza, though enforcement
remains limited17.
·
Cases
involving Myanmar (Rohingya genocide), Russia (Ukraine), and others,
setting important legal precedents.
Sri Lanka’s Justice Timeline and Evidence Preservation
Despite repeated calls from the UN and OHCHR, Sri Lanka has failed to deliver domestic
accountability for war crimes. The OHCHR
Sri Lanka Accountability Project has focused on collecting, consolidating,
and preserving evidence for future prosecutions, supporting victims and
survivors, and developing strategies for international justice. The project’s
mandate has been extended through 2027, with a comprehensive report due in
September-October 2027.
Evidence preservation
is critical: mass graves (Chemmani, Mannar), forensic protocols, and survivor
testimonies are being archived in line with international standards, despite
government obstruction and resource constraints18.
Patterns of Global Conflicts: Integrated NIAC List by Region
Below is a synthesized table of major internal conflicts
(NIACs) since 1945, categorized by region. This list is not exhaustive but
highlights the scale and diversity of post-WWII armed conflicts.
|
Region |
Conflict/Event
Name (Sample) |
Duration |
Estimated
Deaths |
Status
(2026) |
|
Africa |
Second Congo War |
1998-2003 |
3-5.4 million |
Resolved, fragile |
|
|
Ethiopian Civil War & Tigray War |
1974-1991, 2020-22 |
1.75-2m, 160-600k |
Ceasefire, tensions |
|
|
Sudanese Civil War |
2023-present |
150,000+ |
Active hotspot |
|
|
Somali Civil War |
1991-present |
350,000-1m |
Ongoing |
|
|
Boko Haram Insurgency (Nigeria) |
2009-present |
350,000+ |
Ongoing |
|
Americas |
Colombian Conflict |
1964-present |
450,000+ |
Ongoing, low-level |
|
|
Mexican Drug War |
2006-present |
350,000-400,000 |
Ongoing |
|
|
Haitian Crisis |
2018-present |
Tens of thousands |
State collapse |
|
Asia |
Sri Lankan Civil War |
1983-2009 |
80,000-170,000 |
Resolved, unhealed |
|
|
Myanmar Conflict |
1948-present |
230,000+ |
Active hotspot |
|
|
Bangladesh Liberation War |
1971 |
300,000-3m |
Resolved |
|
|
Philippines Civil Conflict |
1968-present |
160,000+ |
Ongoing |
|
Europe/Caucasus |
Yugoslav Wars |
1991-2001 |
130,000-140,000 |
Resolved, fragile |
|
|
Chechen Conflict |
1994-2009 |
80,000-230,000 |
Suppressed |
|
|
Russo-Ukrainian War |
2014-present |
350,000-480,000 |
Active hotspot |
|
MENA |
Syrian Civil War |
2011-2024 |
580,000-610,000 |
Ceasefire, fragile |
|
|
Yemeni Civil War |
2014-present |
377,000+ |
Ongoing |
|
|
Iraq War/Insurgency |
2003-2017 |
460,000-1m |
Resolved, fragile |
|
Oceania |
Papua Conflict (Indonesia) |
1962-present |
100,000-500,000 |
Ongoing, low-level |
Table Notes: Data
compiled from UCDP, ACLED, and regional sources142.
Humanitarian Impact: Displacement, Refugees, Health, and Social Costs
The humanitarian
consequences of war are profound and enduring:
·
Displacement:
As of mid-2025, 117.3 million people
are forcibly displaced worldwide, including 73.5 million internally displaced
and 36.4 million refugees. The majority originate from five countries:
Venezuela, Syria, Ukraine, Afghanistan, and Sudan 1.
·
Health:
Wars devastate health systems, leading to epidemics, malnutrition, and the
collapse of basic services. Attacks on hospitals and the use of starvation as a
weapon have become common tactics.
·
Gendered
Impacts: Conflict-related sexual violence has reached unprecedented levels,
with over 4,600 survivors documented in 2024 alone-a 25% increase from the
previous year. Women and girls constitute the overwhelming majority of victims,
but men, boys, and minorities are also targeted. Sexual violence is used as a
tactic of war, torture, and repression, with devastating physical and
psychological consequences 3.
·
Economic
Costs: War sites experience an average 30%
decline in GDP within five years of conflict onset, with persistent
inflation and destruction of capital. Neighbouring countries also suffer
economic shocks, especially those with strong trade linkages19.
·
Social
Fabric: The trauma of war-loss, displacement, and violence undermines
social cohesion, fuels cycles of revenge, and impedes long-term recovery.
Weapons, Technology, and Warfare Trends
Modern warfare is being transformed by new technologies:
·
Drones:
The use of drones in conflict has increased by 4,000% between 2020 and 2024,
with over 19,000 drone attacks recorded in 2024. Drones are used by both state
and non-state actors, causing direct civilian harm, psychological terror, and
complicating attribution and accountability 9.
·
Cyber
Warfare: State-sponsored cyber operations target critical infrastructure,
elections, and information systems, blurring the lines between war and peace.
·
Nuclear
and Autonomous Systems: The risk of nuclear escalation remains acute in
several hotspots (Ukraine, Taiwan Strait, Iran), while the proliferation of
autonomous weapons raises new ethical and legal challenges.
Data Sources, Verification, and Methodologies
Reliable conflict data is essential for analysis and
accountability. Leading sources include:
·
UCDP
(Uppsala Conflict Data Program): Provides battle-related deaths, conflict
typologies, and georeferenced event data 5.
·
ACLED
(Armed Conflict Location & Event Data): Offers real-time data on
political violence and protest worldwide20.
·
ICRC, UN
OCHA, OHCHR: Monitor humanitarian impact, displacement, and human rights
violations.
·
Forensic
Best Practices: The scientific investigation of mass graves requires
standardized protocols for excavation, evidence collection, and victim
identification, as outlined by the ICRC and international forensic experts18.
Post-War Justice: Evidence Preservation and Forensic Best Practices
Evidence preservation
is critical for future accountability. The investigation of mass graves (e.g.,
Chemmani, Mannar in Sri Lanka; Srebrenica in Bosnia) requires:
·
Systematic
excavation and documentation
·
International
oversight and participation
·
Inclusion
of families and survivors in the process
·
Adherence
to international forensic standards
Failures in evidence preservation, delays, lack of
resources, or political interference undermine the prospects for justice and
reconciliation18.
Chances for Peace & Urgent Advocacy Pathways
Current Peace Prospects
The prospects for peace in 2026 are mixed. While some
conflicts have reached fragile ceasefires (Ethiopia, Syria), others are
escalating (Sudan, Ukraine, Myanmar). The UN’s
credibility is under strain, with calls for Security Council reform and
greater accountability for veto use16.
UN Reform and Grassroots Movements
·
Security
Council Reform: There is growing momentum for limiting or abolishing the
veto, especially in cases of mass atrocities. The 2022 "veto
initiative" has increased scrutiny but not yet delivered substantive
change.
·
Grassroots
and Civil Society: Movements such as the World March for Peace and Non-Violence and local protection
networks are mobilizing for disarmament, nonviolence, and civilian protection17.
Women-led organizations and community groups are often first responders and
advocates for rights and accountability.
Five-Point Global Call to Action
1.
Justice
and Accountability: Strengthen international mechanisms (ICC, ICJ, OHCHR)
to investigate and prosecute war crimes, regardless of perpetrator status.
Support evidence preservation and survivor participation.
2.
Civilian
Protection: Enforce international humanitarian law, prioritize the
protection of civilians, and hold parties accountable for violations, including
sexual violence and attacks on infrastructure.
3.
UN
Reform: Advance Security Council reform to limit the veto in cases of mass
atrocities, increase transparency, and empower the General Assembly to act when
the Council is deadlocked.
4.
Support
for Grassroots Movements: Provide funding, protection, and recognition to
local and women-led organizations working for peace, justice, and humanitarian
relief.
5.
Prevention
and Early Warning: Invest in conflict prevention, mediation, and early
warning systems, addressing root causes such as inequality, exclusion, and
resource competition.
Conclusion: The Imperative of Global Justice and Civilian Protection
The human cost of war
since 1945 is a testament to the failure of violence as a means of
resolving disputes. The persistence of 130+ active conflicts, the scale of
displacement, and the recurrence of atrocities demand a fundamental rethinking
of global security, justice, and governance.
International justice
mechanisms-the UN, ICC, and ICJ-remain the last hope for accountability and
the protection of civilian rights. Yet, their effectiveness depends on
political will, reform, and the active participation of civil society. The
world must move beyond rhetoric to action: ending impunity, protecting the
vulnerable, and building sustainable peace.
The time for complacency is over. The protection of civilians, the pursuit of justice, and the prevention of
future wars are not optional-they are the moral and practical imperatives
of our time. Only through collective action, reform, and unwavering commitment
to human rights can we hope to break the cycle of violence and honour the
promise of "never again."
In solidarity,
Wimal Navaratnam
Human Rights Advocate | ABC Tamil Oli (ECOSOC)
Email: tamilolicanada@gmail.com
References (22)
1. Refugee Data Finder - Key Indicators - .
https://www.unhcr.org/refugee-statistics
2. List of modern conflicts in the Middle East
- Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_modern_conflicts_in_the_Middle_East
3. Conflict-related sexual violence - Report of
the Secretary-General (S .... https://reliefweb.int/report/world/conflict-related-sexual-violence-report-secretary-general-s2025389-enarruzh
9. Drones are Changing How Wars Harm Civilians
- justsecurity.org. https://www.justsecurity.org/123474/drones-are-changing-how-wars-harm-civilians/
4. International Criminal Court arrest warrants
for Russian leaders. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Criminal_Court_arrest_warrants_for_Russian_leaders
5. UCDP Battle-related Deaths Dataset Codebook
Version 25. https://ucdp.uu.se/downloads/brd/ucdp-brd-codebook-251.pdf
6. Yugoslav Wars - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yugoslav_Wars
7. List of conflicts in Europe - Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_conflicts_in_Europe
8. Casualties of the Sri Lankan civil war -
Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Sri_Lankan_Civil_War
10. Mannar mass graves - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mannar_mass_graves
11. Colonial legacy and contemporary civil
violence: a global study from .... https://academic.oup.com/sf/article/104/2/640/8068537
12. The Escalating Stakes of Proxy Wars -
armyupress.army.mil. https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/English-Edition-Archives/November-December-2025/Proxy-Wars/
13. Non-international armed conflict . https://casebook.icrc.org/a_to_z/glossary/non-international-armed-conflict
14. List of conflicts in the Americas -
Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_conflicts_in_the_Americas
15. League of Nations - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/League_of_Nations
16. General Assembly Delegates Demand Overhaul
of Security Council Veto .... https://press.un.org/en/2025/ga12733.doc.htm
17. The Protection of Civilians Cannot Wait:
Ending Impunity and Supporting .... https://globalprotectioncluster.org/sites/default/files/2024-05/poc_advocacy_note_gpc_awg_and_clp_tt_may_2024_final.pdf
18. The Scientific Investigation of Mass Graves:
Towards Protocols and .... https://missingpersons.icrc.org/library/scientific-investigation-mass-graves-towards-protocols-and-standard-operating-procedures
19. Mapping the economic costs of war - CEPR.
https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/mapping-economic-costs-war
20. ACLED. https://acleddata.com/


Great job. What kind of stances should be taken to overcome the greatest genocide and seek justice for it.. You have also mentioned that sri lankan Tamils are facing a genocide by showing so many countries Excellent revelatiory have been made it is covered everthing. A great job Thank ypu so much.
ReplyDelete