The Palk Strait as an Emerging Geopolitical Hotspot: Strategic Competition, Infrastructure Interconnection, and Maritime Sovereignty in the Indian Ocean
The Palk
Strait as an Emerging Geopolitical Hotspot: Strategic Competition,
Infrastructure Interconnection, and Maritime Sovereignty in the Indian Ocean
Introduction:
The Changing Maritime Dynamics of the Palk Strait
The Palk Strait, a shallow and narrow body of water spanning between 25 and 50 kilometers that separates the southeastern coast of India's Tamil Nadu state from the Jaffna Peninsula and Mannar Island in northern Sri Lanka, is undergoing a rapid transition1. Long regarded as a localized maritime corridor characterized by small-scale artisanal fishing, sacred pilgrimage geography, and shared Tamil cultural heritage, the strait is emerging as a critical geopolitical hotspot within the broader Indian Ocean Region (IOR)1. Situated directly adjacent to major global sea lanes of communication (SLOCs) that connect the Strait of Malacca with the Suez Canal, the Palk Strait sits at the intersection of international trade networks, regional energy security, and major-power strategic competition6.
|
Geographic &
Strategic Parameter |
Physical Metric /
Status |
Geopolitical
Significance |
|
Physical Width |
25 to 50 kilometers1 |
High geographical
proximity creates overlapping security perimeters3. |
|
Geographic Extent |
Connects Bay of Bengal to
Gulf of Mannar9 |
Straddles major primary
shipping routes between East Asia, South Asia, and Europe6. |
|
Navigational Depth |
Shallow waters
(predominantly <12 meters)2 |
Restricts large commercial
vessels, creating a strategic bottleneck2. |
|
Sovereign Boundaries |
Demarcated by 1974 &
1976 Bilateral Agreements2 |
Locus of persistent
resource disputes and maritime domain enforcement1. |
The transformation of the
Palk Strait into an arena of strategic contestation is driven by the
convergence of major-power rivalries, cross-border infrastructure proposals,
unresolved territorial friction, and sensitive domestic political dynamics1. While macro-level naval competition in the Indo-Pacific
frequently focuses on deep-water commercial ports and oceanic chokepoints, the
shallow waters of the Palk Strait represent a littoral interface where
sovereign security perimeters directly collide2. Consequently, the strait has shifted from a backwater
into a focal point for regional risk analysis3.
Sino-Indian
Strategic Rivalry: Contestation over the Northern Boundary
The strategic competition between India and China across the Indian Ocean has intensified within the immediate coastal approaches of the Palk Strait3. Historically, Chinese infrastructure investments in Sri Lanka were concentrated in southern and central mega-projects, such as the leasehold of Hambantota Port and the development of the Colombo Port City2. However, Beijing's attempts to extend its economic and technological presence into Sri Lanka's Northern Province have drawn the geopolitical contest into the immediate vicinity of the Indian coastline2.
|
Project Aspect |
Initial Chinese
Proposal (Sinosoar) |
Implemented Indian
Project (U-Solar) |
|
Primary Contractors |
Sinosoar-Etechwin Joint
Venture (China)3 |
U-Solar Clean Energy
Solutions (India)19 |
|
Financial Mechanism |
Asian Development Bank
(ADB) Loan Framework3 |
$10.995 Million Full Grant
Assistance from India19 |
|
Target Locations |
Delft (Neduntheevu),
Analaitivu, & Nainativu3 |
Delft (Neduntheevu),
Analaitivu, & Nainativu19 |
|
Technical Capacity |
1,700 kW Solar, 530 kW
Wind, 2,350 kWh Battery20 |
1,700 kW Solar, 530 kW
Wind, 2,400 kWh Battery19 |
|
Geopolitical Outcome |
Suspended in late 2021
following Indian objections20 |
Contract executed in March
2024; active installation19 |
The security sensitivity of
this maritime boundary was underscored by the dispute over hybrid renewable
energy projects on three outlying Sri Lankan islands in the Palk Strait: Delft
(Neduntheevu), Analaitivu, and Nainativu3.
Located less than 50 kilometers from the Tamil Nadu coast, these islands occupy
a highly sensitive vantage point3.
When the Sri Lankan Cabinet approved an ADB-backed tender in January 2021
awarding the project to the Chinese firm Sinosoar-Etechwin, New Delhi lodged
strong diplomatic protests3. Indian security
planners maintained that the presence of Chinese state-backed personnel and
dual-use technological infrastructure on islands overlooking the Palk Strait
posed severe threats to national security, creating potential platforms for
signals intelligence gathering against sensitive space, defense, and nuclear
assets situated along India's southern coastline3.
To neutralize Beijing's
footprint, India offered a full grant of $10.995 million to execute the
project, effectively replacing the ADB loan structure3. Under sustained diplomatic pressure, Sri Lanka
suspended the Chinese contract in late 20213.
Subsequently, in March 2024, the Sri Lanka Sustainable Energy Authority signed
a formal contract with the Indian enterprise U-Solar Clean Energy Solutions to
build hybrid solar, wind, battery, and standby diesel power systems across the
three islands19. Chinese state media
and diplomatic representatives publicly criticized the cancellation as
third-party intervention, subsequently redirecting similar renewable energy
projects to 12 islands in the Maldives17.
This episode demonstrates
that New Delhi regards the Palk Strait as an integral component of its
immediate security zone3. Under the
framework of its Neighborhood First policy and the MAHASAGAR (Mutual and
Holistic Advancement for Security and Growth Across Regions) doctrine, India
seeks to ensure that external powers do not establish military, surveillance,
or critical infrastructure positions within its maritime periphery1.
Cross-Strait
Connectivity Initiatives and the Sovereignty Paradox
Simultaneously, the Palk Strait has become the focus of cross-border infrastructure initiatives designed to physically connect Sri Lanka with the Indian mainland22. These projects create a strategic paradox for policymakers in Colombo: while physical integration offers economic gains, it raises concerns regarding national autonomy, economic dependency, and domestic political stability8.
|
Infrastructure
Initiative |
Physical Alignment
& Scope |
Projected Economic
Rationale |
Strategic &
Political Impasses |
|
Palk Strait Binational
Land Bridge |
23–40 km road and rail
bridge/tunnel linking Dhanushkodi (India) to Talaimannar (Sri Lanka)16. Estimated cost: $3.6B–$5.0B22. |
Reduces freight transit
times from 40–122 hours to ~9 hours24;
integrates Sri Lanka with Southern Indian supply chains22. |
Opposition over loss of
physical autonomy16; fears of illegal
immigration16; religious
concerns regarding Ram Sethu23. |
|
HVDC Subsea Power Grid
Interconnection |
285–400 km transmission
network featuring a 50 km subsea cable laid across the Palk Strait bed27. |
Enables cross-border power
trade29; allows Sri Lanka to export surplus renewable power to
the Indian grid4. |
Technical grid dependency28; environmental concerns regarding subsea cable
installation23. |
|
Sethusamudram Shipping
Canal (SSCP) |
167 km shipping canal
requiring an 89 km dredged route (12m depth) through shallow straits9. |
Saves 10–30 hours steaming
time for Indian coastal trade9;
avoids circumnavigating Sri Lanka9. |
Stalled by Ram Sethu legal
petitions9; severe ecological
risks to Gulf of Mannar9; draft limits
exclude ships >30k DWT9. |
The proposal to construct a
23-to-40-kilometer binational road and rail bridge across the Palk
Strait—connecting Dhanushkodi in Tamil Nadu to Talaimannar on Sri Lanka's
Mannar Island—has gained renewed diplomatic focus16. Bilateral feasibility assessments conducted between
2023 and 2026 evaluated the technical, economic, and environmental dimensions
of the proposed corridor4. A detailed
analytical paper published by the Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA)
highlighted that cargo movement between India and Sri Lanka via a direct land
link could take approximately nine hours, compared to current maritime transit
times that range between 40 and 122 hours due to port scheduling, customs
clearances, and turnaround delays24.
Proponents contend that a fixed link would allow Sri Lankan manufacturing firms
to integrate into the industrial supply chains of Southern India—specifically
Tamil Nadu, which is projected to become a trillion-dollar economy by
2034—while driving regional economic development in Sri Lanka's Northern and
Eastern provinces22.
Despite these economic
arguments, the land bridge project encounters political resistance in Sri Lanka16. Political factions, religious leaders, and civic groups
express concern that physical connectivity could turn Sri Lanka into an
economic client state of India, encourage illicit cross-border movement, and
reactivate historical ethnic dynamics between Tamil Nadu and northern Sri Lanka16. Highlighting these sensitivities, Sri Lankan President
Anura Kumara Dissanayake affirmed that the nation was not prepared to execute a
fixed land link with the mainland16.
In parallel, India and Sri
Lanka are progressing toward a High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) power grid
interconnection project27. Spanning a
total distance of 285 to 400 kilometers, the transmission system incorporates a
50-kilometer subsea cable section laid across the bed of the Palk Strait27. The initiative aims to facilitate cross-border clean
energy trade, enabling Sri Lanka to monetize its wind and solar potential in
the north by exporting excess power to India, while gaining access to stable
power imports during dry seasons4.
Persistent
Friction Points: The Fisheries Conflict and Kachchatheevu
While large-scale infrastructure projects represent long-term strategic variables, daily security friction in the Palk Strait is driven by the long-standing fisheries dispute and the legal status of Kachchatheevu Island1. Kachchatheevu, an uninhabited 285-acre island situated in the Palk Strait, remains a sensitive point in bilateral relations2.
1974 & 1976 Maritime Agreements ──> India recognizes Sri Lankan
sovereignty over Kachchatheevu.
Post-2009 Civil War Era ──> Sri Lankan Navy enforces the
IMBL strictly.
Mechanized Trawling Conflict ──> Indian trawlers cross the IMBL,
destroying benthic ecology.
Diplomatic Friction ──> Recurring arrests, vessel
impoundments, and political demands.
Under the 1974 and 1976
Maritime Boundary Agreements, India formally recognized Sri Lankan sovereignty
over Kachchatheevu, establishing the International Maritime Boundary Line
(IMBL)2. While the 1974 accord preserved traditional rights for
Indian fishermen to dry nets and attend the annual St. Anthony's festival on
the island, subsequent legal interpretations by Colombo restricted commercial
fishing within Sri Lanka's Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ)12. Following the conclusion of the Sri Lankan Civil War in
2009, the Sri Lankan Navy intensified maritime boundary enforcement, bringing
its patrols into frequent contact with Indian fishing fleets14. Mechanized bottom-trawlers from Tamil Nadu regularly
cross the narrow IMBL into fish-rich Sri Lankan waters, causing depletion of
marine stocks and damage to seabed ecosystems1.
This conflict generates
multi-tiered political and security complications:
At the inter-state level,
the frequent arrest of Indian fishermen, confiscation of trawlers, and
occasional fatalities resulting from naval enforcement actions trigger
recurring diplomatic disputes between New Delhi and Colombo1. Within Sri Lanka, the issue exposes an intra-Tamil
socio-economic divide2. Northern Sri
Lankan Tamil fishermen, attempting to rebuild their livelihoods after decades
of civil conflict, strongly oppose mechanized bottom-trawling by Indian fleets3. They report that large Indian trawlers destroy local
nets, deplete fish stocks, and ruin fragile benthic marine habitats3.
Concurrently, domestic
politics in Tamil Nadu sustain the issue on the national stage1. State political leaders frequently call for the
retrieval of Kachchatheevu, challenging the constitutional validity of the 1974
agreement13. This ongoing domestic pressure requires New Delhi to
manage regional political demands alongside its broader strategic partnership
with Colombo1.
The
Sethusamudram Shipping Canal Dilemma: Geoeconomic Rationales and Ecological
Impasses
First proposed in 1860 by Commander A.D. Taylor of the Indian Marines, the Sethusamudram Shipping Canal Project (SSCP) remains one of South Asia's most controversial mega-engineering proposals9. The project involves dredging a 167-kilometer shipping canal—including an 89-kilometer dredged section to a depth of 12 meters—through the shallow waters of the Palk Strait and Adam's Bridge (Ram Sethu)9. The primary objective is to create a navigable sea route within India's territorial waters, enabling vessels traveling between the western and eastern coasts of the subcontinent to avoid circumnavigating Sri Lanka9.
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ SETHUSAMUDRAM SHIPPING
CANAL PROJECT (SSCP) │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Projected Benefits:
│
│ • Reduces coastal voyage distances by up to 400 nautical miles [cite: 9,
31].│
│ • Saves 10 to 30 hours of steaming time for domestic vessels [cite: 9, 32].│
│ • Retains domestic transshipment within Indian waters. │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Core Impasses:
│
│ • Religious Opposition: Dredging through Ram Sethu limestone shoals.│
│ • Ecological Damage: Threatens Gulf of Mannar Marine Biosphere Reserve.│
│ • Technical Limits: 12m draft excludes global vessels >30,000 DWT.│
│ • Strategic Concerns: Sri Lankan anxieties over trade diversion.│
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Proponents argue that the
canal would generate significant geoeconomic benefits by reducing steaming
distances by up to 400 nautical miles and cutting voyage times by 10 to 30
hours for coastal cargo vessels9.
This navigation route was intended to stimulate industrial growth along Tamil
Nadu's southern coastline, enhance maritime security, and lower domestic
coastal shipping costs11.
However, the canal project
remains stalled due to a combination of cultural, ecological, economic, and
strategic obstacles:
Religious and cultural
objections center on the proposed alignment across Adam's Bridge (Ram Sethu), a
chain of natural limestone shoals linking Rameswaram Island to Sri Lanka's
Mannar Island9. Hindu organizations
maintain that the structure is the sacred bridge built by Lord Rama, leading to
legal petitions in the Supreme Court of India9. In 2018, the Union Government filed an affidavit
affirming its intention to explore alternative alignments that would avoid
disturbing or damaging the Ram Sethu formation9.
Ecological assessments warn
that extensive dredging would cause irreversible damage to sensitive marine
ecosystems9. The proposed
alignment lies near the Gulf of Mannar Marine Biosphere Reserve, an
ecologically sensitive marine sanctuary host to over 3,600 species of flora and
fauna, extensive coral reefs, and endangered sea mammals such as the dugong9. Marine scientists argue that continuous maintenance
dredging would destabilize benthic habitats, increase turbidity, and damage
regional fishery resources9.
Furthermore, hydrographic
and economic evaluations question the canal's viability for international
shipping9. Designed to a depth of 12 meters, the canal can only
accommodate ships weighing under 30,000 Deadweight Tonnage (DWT) with drafts
restricted to 10 meters9. Modern
commercial container ships, bulk carriers, and oil tankers routinely exceed
60,000 to 150,000 DWT, making them too large to transit the canal9. As a result, major commercial shipping lines would
likely continue using deep-water routes south of Sri Lanka, limiting the
canal's commercial utility relative to its initial capital costs and ongoing
dredging expenses9.
From a strategic
perspective, Sri Lankan planners view the Sethusamudram project with concern11. A fully operational canal could alter regional maritime
traffic flows, potentially reducing transshipment volumes at Sri Lankan ports
while granting India greater operational control over navigation in the Palk
Strait11. Despite these challenges, regional political support
for the project persists9. In January
2023, the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly unanimously adopted a resolution
urging the Union Government to revive the project along an alternative route
that preserves Ram Sethu9. Meanwhile, the
state-owned enterprise Sethusamudram Corporation Limited (SCL) continues to
maintain its corporate structure and perform regulatory reviews40.
Sri Lanka's
Strategic Balancing Act in a Multipolar Indian Ocean
The evolving dynamics within the Palk Strait reflect Sri Lanka's broader strategic positioning in the Indian Ocean8. Occupying an important geographic location along major East-West shipping lanes, Sri Lanka pursues a policy of strategic multi-alignment, aiming to attract foreign investment and modernize its infrastructure while preserving its political autonomy8.
SRI LANKA'S
MULTI-ALIGNMENT DYNAMICS
┌────────────────────────┐
│ SRI LANKA (Colombo) │
└───────────┬────────────┘
│
┌────────────────────────────┼────────────────────────────┐
│ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼
[ INDIA ] [ CHINA ] [ WESTERN POWERS ]
• Defence MoU (2025) • Belt & Road Initiative • US Navy CARAT Exercises
• MAHASAGAR Framework • Port Investments • NATO Security Talks
• Grant Infrastructure (Hambantota & Colombo) • EU & Japan Engagement
Sri Lanka balances its
external relationships through several distinct diplomatic and defense vectors:
In its relations with India,
geographical proximity creates an interconnected security environment1. Shared security interests encompass maritime domain
awareness, counter-terrorism, disaster response, and cross-border energy
connectivity1. In 2025, India and
Sri Lanka signed a landmark five-year defense cooperation Memorandum of
Understanding (MoU), formalizing military training programs, joint exercises
such as Mitra Shakti and SLINEX, and high-level defense dialogues1. Colombo recognizes India's core security interests,
seeking to ensure that its domestic decisions do not compromise New Delhi's
regional security concerns3.
At the same time, China
remains an important economic partner for Sri Lanka5. Despite Indian pushback regarding projects in the
northern outlying islands, Beijing maintains a significant economic footprint
across Sri Lanka through Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) infrastructure
investments2. Colombo seeks to
maintain a constructive economic relationship with Beijing while ensuring that
commercial partnerships do not generate strategic friction with India3.
Concurrently, Sri Lanka has
expanded defense and maritime security cooperation with Western nations and
regional democracies42. The Sri Lankan Navy
regularly engages with the United States in practical exercises, including the
Cooperation Afloat Readiness and Training (CARAT) program focused on maritime
domain awareness and search-and-rescue capabilities42. Furthermore, Sri Lanka engages in security dialogues
with Japan, France, and NATO representatives to modernize its military
hardware, enhance surveillance capabilities, and build cyber resilience42.
Under President Anura Kumara
Dissanayake, Colombo's foreign policy stresses strategic autonomy1. Sri Lanka aims to avoid becoming an arena for
major-power competition, operating under the diplomatic approach of engaging
with multiple international partners while maintaining sovereign control over
its national security and economic priorities42.
Conclusion:
Trajectory of the Palk Strait Flashpoint
The Palk Strait has
established itself as an active geopolitical hotspot in the Indian Ocean Region3. Rather than displaying high-intensity naval
confrontations, competition in this narrow corridor takes the form of
micro-geopolitical rivalries, subsea and overland infrastructure projects,
resource disputes, and competing security perimeters1.
The future strategic
trajectory of the Palk Strait will likely be shaped by three main developments:
First, security friction
will persist along India's southern maritime perimeter3. New Delhi's policy of resisting foreign military or
dual-use technological infrastructure in northern Sri Lanka will continue to
limit external involvement near Tamil Nadu3.
Any attempt by third-party powers to establish infrastructure or surveillance
positions in the northern outlying islands will draw strong diplomatic and
financial counter-measures from India3.
Second, cross-strait
integration will move forward unevenly16.
While energy projects like the HVDC subsea power cable offer clear economic
benefits with manageable political risks, larger physical connectivity
proposals—such as the binational land bridge—will face ongoing domestic
political caution in Sri Lanka16.
Sri Lankan concerns regarding national autonomy, illegal movement, and internal
political stability will require long-term diplomatic management before fixed
transportation links can move forward16.
Third, localized resource
disputes will continue to affect bilateral relations1. Without a sustainable agreement addressing
bottom-trawling and fishing access around Kachchatheevu, routine maritime
enforcement will generate ongoing political friction between Tamil Nadu and Sri
Lanka1.
Ultimately, the Palk Strait demonstrates the complex
dynamics of contemporary maritime South Asia5.
Navigating the challenges of this narrow waterway requires managing local
livelihoods, national sovereignty, cross-border infrastructure, and major-power
strategic competition1. The way India
and Sri Lanka handle these overlapping issues will have a direct bearing on the
strategic stability of the broader Indo-Pacific region1.
Works cited
1.
BRIDGING THE PALK
STRAIT - CRF India, https://www.crfindia.org/-/media/Project/ChintanResearchFoundation/Publications-PDF/New/8th-May/Bridging-the-palk-strait.ashx
2.
Geo-strategic
importance of Hambantota Port in the Indian Ocean, https://ijsrst.com/paper/4348.pdf
3.
Sino-Indian
conflict over the North Sri Lankan power project deepens, https://counterpoint.lk/sino-indian-conflict-north-sri-lankan-power-project-deepens/
4.
India-Sri Lanka
Land Connectivity Feasibility Study Almost Complete, https://swarajyamag.com/infrastructure/india-sri-lanka-land-connectivity-feasibility-study-almost-complete
5.
Ports and
Geopolitics: The Case of Sino-Indian Rivalry in the Bay of, https://www.orfonline.org/research/ports-and-geopolitics-the-case-of-sino-indian-rivalry-in-the-bay-of-bengal
6.
Focusing on
security strategies of China and India over Sri Lanka, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367052546_Sri_Lanka_in_Geopolitics_Focusing_on_security_strategies_of_China_and_India_over_Sri_Lanka
7.
Positioning the
Bay of Bengal in the Great Game of the Indo-Pacific, https://media.defense.gov/2022/Mar/28/2002964030/-1/-1/1/FEATURE_ANWAR.PDF
8.
The Geopolitical
Importance of Sri Lanka in the Indian Ocean Region, https://niice.org.np/archives/12328
9.
Sethusamudram
Shipping Canal Project - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sethusamudram_Shipping_Canal_Project
10.
THE IMPORTANCE OF
THE PALK STRAIT - YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/shorts/PPdaI9zFbZQ
11.
security
dimensions of sethu samudram ship canal project and, https://scispace.com/pdf/security-dimensions-of-sethu-samudram-ship-canal-project-and-14236hmy10.pdf
12.
India, Sri Lanka
and the Kachchatheevu Crisis - IPCS, https://www.ipcs.org/comm_select.php?articleNo=3917
13.
Katchatheevu -
Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katchatheevu
14.
The India–Sri
Lanka Fisheries Dispute: Creating a Win-Win in the, https://carnegieendowment.org/india/research/2016/09/the-india-sri-lanka-fisheries-dispute-creating-a-win-win-in-the-palk-bay
15.
INDIAN AND SRI
LANKA FISHERMAN CRISIS: THE PALK STRAIT, https://www.whiteblacklegal.co.in/details/indian-and-sri-lanka-fisherman-crisis-the-palk-strait-and-the-kachchatheevu-island-dispute-by---ayushi-trivedi-
16.
Palk Strait
Bridge - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palk_Strait_Bridge
17.
China firm slams
'third-party' interference in Lanka project - The Hindu, https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/china-firm-slams-third-party-interference-in-lanka-project/article33906958.ece
18.
Sri Lanka
confirms India has objected to power projects given to, https://economynext.com/sri-lanka-confirms-india-has-objected-to-power-projects-given-to-china-on-northern-islands-78659/
19.
With China out,
Indian firm to build Sri Lanka power project, https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/displacing-chinese-project-indian-firm-set-to-build-hybrid-power-systems-in-sri-lankas-northern-islands/article67903081.ece
20.
India blasted for
meddling in Chinese firm's energy projects in Sri, https://www.themorning.lk/india-blasted-for-meddling-in-chinese-firms-energy-projects-in-sri-lanka
21.
China suspends
Sri Lankan solar plants after India protest, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/china-suspends-sri-lankan-solar-plants-after-india-protest/articleshow/88059576.cms
22.
The Palk Strait
Link: Sri Lanka's Unresolved Question – TCSS, https://trincocss.org/the-palk-strait-link-sri-lankas-unresolved-question/
23.
Bridging the Palk
Strait: Assessing Indo-Lanka Land Connectivity, https://www.cpalanka.org/bridging-the-palk-strait/
24.
New report sees
major upside in India-Sri Lanka land bridge proposal, https://www.newswire.lk/2026/05/19/new-report-sees-major-upside-in-india-sri-lanka-land-bridge-proposal/
25.
India's $5BN Plan
for a Bridge to Sri Lanka - YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/shorts/aUSh3uNkIr4
26.
India's $5BN Plan
for a Bridge to Sri Lanka - YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Q3VHZEkXYk
27.
Regional Ties:
India strengthens its cross-border connections, https://powerline.net.in/2025/12/09/regional-ties-india-strengthens-its-cross-border-connections/
28.
India-Sri Lanka
Power Grid Interconnection: Complete Analysis Of, https://lankabiznews.com/india-sri-lanka-power-grid-connection-analysis/
29.
India, Sri Lanka
Sign MoU for HVDC Link to Boost Energy Integration, https://www.asiabusinessoutlook.com/news/india-sri-lanka-sign-mou-for-hvdc-link-to-boost-energy-integration-nwid-8550.html
30.
India Plans to
Link Power Grids with Sri Lanka to Enhance Energy, https://energy.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/power/india-exploring-power-grid-links-with-sri-lanka-to-boost-cross-border-energy-trade-power-minister-khattar/129678185
31.
Sethusamudram
canal project - TNPSC Current Affairs, https://www.tnpscthervupettagam.com/currentaffairs-detail/sethusamudram-canal-project?cat=tamilnadu-news
32.
Consultation to
Stop implementation of Sethu Samudiram Shipping, https://hrf.net.in/consultation-to-stop-implementation-of-sethu-samudiram-shipping-canal-project-sscp/
33.
Explained: What
ails the Sethusamudram canal project - The Federal, https://thefederal.com/explainers-2/explained-what-ails-the-sethusamudram-canal-project
34.
When
Megaengineering Disturbs Ram: The Sethusamudram Ship, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265159917_When_Megaengineering_Disturbs_Ram_The_Sethusamudram_Ship_Canal_Project
35.
Palk Strait land
link proposal back in spotlight - International, https://www.dailymirror.lk/international/Palk-Strait-land-link-proposal-back-in-spotlight/107-340406
36.
Katchatheevu
Island Dispute - PMF IAS, https://www.pmfias.com/katchatheevu-island/
37.
The India–Sri
Lanka Fisheries Dispute: Creating a Win-Win in the, https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2016/09/the-india-sri-lanka-fisheries-dispute-creating-a-win-win-in-the-palk-bay
38.
Indian outrage at
Sri Lanka as China establishes power projects in, https://www.tamilguardian.com/content/indian-outrage-sri-lanka-china-establishes-power-projects-north
39.
Resolving the
India-Sri Lanka fishing dispute, https://www.cppr.in/articles/resolving-the-india-sri-lanka-fishing-disputes
40.
20th ANNUAL
REPORT - Ministry of Ports, Shipping and Waterways, https://shipmin.gov.in/sites/default/files/Annual%20Report%20SCL%20english.pdf
41.
BJP's U-turn:
Supports TN Assembly's demand that Sethusamudram, https://www.thenewsminute.com/tamil-nadu/bjp-s-u-turn-supports-tn-assembly-s-demand-sethusamudram-project-should-go-171898
42.
Sri Lanka's
Strategic Balancing Act Opportunity or New Geopolitical, https://www.dailymirror.lk/print/news-features/Sri-Lankas-Strategic-Balancing-Act-Opportunity-or-New-Geopolitical-Trap/131-350325


Comments
Post a Comment
We would love to hear your thoughts! Whether you have feedback, questions, or ideas related to our initiatives, please feel free to share them in the comment section below. Your input helps us grow and serve our community better. Join the conversation and let your voice be heard!- ABC Tamil Oli (ECOSOC)